Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:02:54.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low SAR planar monopole antenna for wireless communication applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

Dalia M. Elsheakh*
Affiliation:
Microstrip Department, Electronics Research Institute, Giza, Egypt. Phone: 01118976695
Esmat A. Abdallah
Affiliation:
Microstrip Department, Electronics Research Institute, Giza, Egypt. Phone: 01118976695
*
Corresponding author: Dalia M. Elsheakh Email: daliaelsheakh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simple internal multiband monopole antenna with low specific absorption rate (SAR) for most wireless communication applications is presented in this paper. The proposed antenna is an unequal arms monopole antenna with a meander stripoin the other substrate side. The antenna has a simple structure and it is sufficiently small in size to be easily fitted on the housing of a mobile phone or a universal serial bus (USB) dongle with size 20 × 50 × 0.8 mm3. The antenna is designed to operate in different bands to cover most of allocated wireless communication bands in the frequency range from 0.9 to 6 GHz. The proposed antenna has an acceptable average gain of about 2.75 dBi and an average efficiency of about 85% while providing a monopole radiation pattern in both horizontal and elevation planes, with average half-power beam width of 65° in the elevation plane. The simulation and the experimental results of the antenna are in agreement. The SAR in the human head is investigated by using CST 2012 Microwave Studio Hugo Voxel Model.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1. Antenna dimensions of typical WLAN laptop computer antennas in recent article (length, width, and thickness).

Figure 1

Table 2. Operating bands and corresponding frequency range for proposed antenna at standard VSWR (3:1) wireless communications.

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Proposed antenna geometry; (a) upper, (b) bottom layer, (c) mobile handset housing, and (d) USB housing, (the gray layers are metal).

Figure 3

Fig. 2. (a–d) Proposed antenna design steps, and (e) simulated reflection coefficient of the design procedure.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Current distribution for the proposed antenna at (a) 0.9 GHz, (b) 1.5 GHz, (c) 1.8 GHz, (d) 2.4 GHz, (e) 3.5 GHz, and (f) 5.2 GHz.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. (a) The proposed antenna with the head model at 1.85 GHz. (b) |S11| of the proposed antenna with/without the head model.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Variation of SAR with distance from the head at different frequencies.

Figure 7

Table 3. Simulated SAR values of the proposed antenna with 0 mm distance from the head.

Figure 8

Table 4. Effect of the head model on the radiation efficiency.

Figure 9

Fig. 6. The fabricated antenna, (a) monopole antenna without lower strip and (b) monopole antenna with lower strip, (c) USB housing, and (d) mobile housing.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Comparison of simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna without lower strip.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Comparison of simulated and measured reflection coefficient (a) proposed antenna and (b) proposed antenna with USB dongle, housing, and mobile housing.

Figure 12

Table 5. Proposed antenna parameters.

Figure 13

Table 6. Measured and simulated radiation pattern in YZ and XY planes at resonant frequency of the proposed antenna with main radiator (unequal arms U-shaped monopole) and the meander strip, EΦ: slide lines, EΘ: dotted lines, black represent the simulated results and gray represent the measured data.