Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:42:34.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Devonian ultrapotassic magmatism in the North China Craton: geochemical and isotopic evidence for subcontinental lithospheric mantle metasomatism by subducted sediment-derived fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2019

Xiaolu Niu*
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research on Mantle (CARMA), Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China
Yildirim Dilek
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
Fei Liu
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research on Mantle (CARMA), Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China
Guangying Feng
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research on Mantle (CARMA), Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China
Jingsui Yang
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Research on Mantle (CARMA), Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xiaolu Niu, Email: niuxiaoludx@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report new U–Pb zircon age data, zircon in situ oxygen isotope, mineral chemistry, whole-rock geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotopic compositions from the Early Devonian ultrapotassic Gucheng pluton in the North China Craton, and discuss its petrogenesis. The Gucheng pluton is exposed in the northern part of the North China Craton and forms a composite intrusion, consisting of K-feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite, clinopyroxene-bearing syenite and alkali-feldspar syenite. Mineral phases in these lithologies include clinopyroxene (Wo43–48En19–35Fs18–38), sanidine (An0Ab3–11Or89–97), and subordinate titanite, andradite and Na-feldspar. These rocks show homogeneous Sr but variable Nd isotopic compositions, and have relatively high zircon in situ oxygen isotopes (δ18O = 5.2–6.7). The Gucheng plutonic rocks formed through fractional crystallization and accumulation from ultrapotassic magmas, which were originated from partial melting of metasomatic vein systems in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle of the North China Craton. These vein networks developed as a result of the reactions of fluids derived from subducted pelitic sediments on the downgoing Palaeo-Asian ocean floor with the enriched, subcontinental lithospheric mantle peridotites. Sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) U–Pb zircon dating has revealed a crystallization age of 415 Ma for the timing of the emplacement of the Gucheng pluton that marks the early stages of alkaline magmatism associated with the Andean-type continental margin evolution along the northern edge of the North China Craton facing the Palaeo-Asian Ocean.

Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Simplified tectonic map of the North China Craton. (b) Simplified tectonics of the SE Central Asian Orogenic Belt (modified from Xiao et al.2003). (c) Geological map of the Gucheng pluton.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Outcrop image of the Gucheng pluton, showing the contact relationships between the main lithologies and the extensional normal fault patterns. (b–d) Photomicrographs of K-feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite (plain-polarized light), clinopyroxene-bearing syenite (plain-polarized light) and alkali-feldspar syenite (crossed polars), respectively. AFS = alkali-feldspar syenite; CpxS = clinopyroxene-bearing syenite; KCpx = K-feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite; K-fsp, K-feldspar; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Ttn, titanite.

Figure 2

Table 1. Major and trace element compositions of Gucheng pluton

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Plots of major and representative trace element vs SiO2 contents for the Gucheng pluton.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (a) and primitive mantle-normalized multi-element diagrams (b) for the Gucheng pluton. Chondrite values are from Boynton (1984), and the primitive mantle values are from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Classification diagrams of clinopyroxene (a) and feldspar (b) from the Gucheng pluton.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Backscattered electron (BSE) images of the K-feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite and clinopyroxene-bearing syenites of the Gucheng pluton. Sa – sanidine; Ab – albite; Cpx – clinopyroxene; Ttn – titanite.

Figure 7

Table 2. Zircon SHRIMP U–Th–Pb isotopic data for Gucheng syenite

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Concordia diagram showing the zircon age data. Inset shows the weighted mean 206Pb/238U age.

Figure 9

Table 3. Zircon in situ oxygen isotope compositions for the Gucheng syenite

Figure 10

Table 4. Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic data of Gucheng pluton

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Plot of ϵNd(t) vs initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios for the Gucheng pluton. Nd–Sr isotopic modelling based on a two-component mixing model (Langmuir et al. 1978). Also displayed on this plot are the Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of a depleted mantle source (DM; Rudnick et al. 2004), Palaeozoic lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton (SCLM; Zheng & Lu, 1999), mafic lower crust of the North China Craton (Zhang et al. 1998; Zhou et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2004), tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite gneisses (TTG gneisses; Jahn et al. 1987; Zhang et al. 1991), and global subducting sediment (GLOSS; Plank & Langmuir, 1998) for comparison. Ticks on the lines represent 10 % interval.

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Plot of Th/Yb vs Nb/Yb for the Gucheng pluton. The compositions of different end members are after McDonough (1990) and Pearce & Peate (1995).

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Interpretive chemical geodynamics model, depicting a time-progressive development of the Middle Palaeozoic evolution of the northern continental margin of the North China Craton and its magmatism. Notice the geodynamic switch from a collisional to accretionary continental margin tectonics between 490 Ma and 470 Ma. A – Intraoceanic development of the Ulan island arc complex in the Palaeo-Asian Ocean, with fore-arc oceanic lithosphere formation and deposition of pelitic and volcaniclastic sediments in a back-arc tectonic setting. B – Inception of the shallow subduction of a Palaeo-Asian Ocean slab, following the collisional accretion of the Ulan island arc complex into the continental margin of the North China Craton. U–Pb zircon ages of 466 Ma from a granodiorite pluton in the Bainaimiao continental arc mark the earliest stages of subduction zone magmatism far inland from the trench and nearly time-equivalent Ondor–Sum accretionary complex farther north. B1 – Emplacement of metasomatic veins derived from partial melting of subducted metapelites at the shallow slab interface into the subcontinental lithospheric mantle peridotites of the North China Craton. C – Slab rollback and the associated slab steepening cause the continental arc magmatism represented by the Bainaimiao arc to migrate northwards in the upper plate. Slab-rollback-induced asthenospheric flow results in heat and melt flux into the subcontinental lithospheric mantle that in turn leads into partial melting of metasomatic veins in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle peridotites and hence production of ultra-alkaline magmas, forming the Gucheng pluton. C1 – Nb/La vs La/Yb diagram displaying the mantle source (aesthenospheric vs lithospheric) of the Gucheng pluton magmas. C2 – (Tb/Yb)PM vs (La/Sm)PM diagram, showing the garnet vs spinel stability field of the source mantle, and the relative degrees of source enrichment and degree of melting. PM = Primitive mantle. C3 – Inferred magma chamber model for the development of the Gucheng pluton magmas through melt migration, replenishment and fractional crystallization processes. AFS = alkali-feldspar syenite; CpxS = clinopyroxene-bearing syenite; KCpx = K-feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite; MLC = mafic lower crust; TTG = tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite. In the plot of Nb/La vs La/Yb, the black lines separating fields of lithospheric, aesthenospheric and mixed lithospheric–aesthenospheric mantle are from Abdel-Rahman (2002); the area of Fanshan (FS) complex is from Niu et al. (2012). In the plot of (Tb/Yb)PM vs (La/Sm)PM, the boundary between melting products of garnet- and spinel-bearing peridotites is from Wang et al. (2002).

Supplementary material: File

Niu et al. supplementary material

Niu et al. supplementary material 1

Download Niu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.2 MB