Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:15:58.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influences of forested and grassland vegetation on late Quaternary ecosystem development as recorded in lacustrine sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

Kendra K. McLauchlan*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
Ioan Lascu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom
Emily Mellicant
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
Robert J. Scharping
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
Joseph J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author e-mail address: mclauch@ksu.edu (K.K. McLauchlan), lascui@si.edu (I. Lascu).
*Corresponding author e-mail address: mclauch@ksu.edu (K.K. McLauchlan), lascui@si.edu (I. Lascu).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geosphere-biosphere interactions are ubiquitous features of the Earth surface, yet the development of interactions between newly exposed lithologic surfaces and colonizing plants during primary succession after glaciation are lacking temporal detail. To assess the nature, rate, and magnitude of vegetation influence on parent material and sediment delivery, we analyzed ecosystem and geochemical proxies from lacustrine sediment cores at a grassland site and a forested site in the northern United States. Over time, terrigenous inputs declined at both sites, with increasing amounts of organic inputs toward present. The similarities between sites were striking given that the grassland sequence began in the Early Holocene, and the forested sequence began after the last glacial maximum. Multiple mechanisms of chemical weathering, hydrologic transport, and changes in source material potentially contribute to this pattern. Although there were strong links between vegetation composition and nitrogen cycling at each site, it appears that changes in forest type, or from oak woodland to grassland, did not exert a large influence on elemental (K, Ti, Si, Ca, Fe, Mn, and S) abundance in the sedimentary sequences. Rather, other factors in the catchment-lake system determined the temporal sequence of elemental abundance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Regional map with locations of Fox Lake, Devils Lake, and the other sites referred to in text (Deming Lake AND Elk Lake). (b) Detail of Fox Lake basin morphology and vegetation. (c) Detail of Devils Lake basin morphology and vegetation. Red dots represent coring sites. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Table 1. Proxy variables for various ecosystem processes, measured on sediment cores from the grassland and forested lakes and presented in this manuscript. Original sources for some of the proxy variables shown in this manuscript are also reported here.

Figure 2

Table 2. The 21 input variables for the principal component analysis of the Devils Lake sediment core and eigenvectors for each variable on the first two principal components.

Figure 3

Table 3. The 17 input variables for the principal component analysis of the Fox Lake sediment core and eigenvectors for each variable on the first two principal components.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Source material of sediments at the forested site (Devils Lake, Wisconsin): fluxes of biogenic (BIO), pedogenic (PED), and lithogenic (LITH) ferrimagnetic material calculated from measured magnetic parameters, N and C isotopic composition, and C:N ratio of organic material, and relative abundances of main pollen types. Zones (D1–D5) were based on lithologic transitions in the sediment core identified by Williams et al. (2015).

Figure 5

Figure 3. Source material of sediments at the grassland site (Fox Lake, Minnesota): fluxes of clay, silt, and sand, N and C isotopic composition, and the C:N ratio of organic material, and relative abundance of arboreal pollen. Zones (F1–F5) were based on magnetic susceptibility transitions in the sediment core identified by Commerford et al. (2016).

Figure 6

Figure 4. (color online) (a) Centered-log ratios of selected elements and (b) log ratios of element intensities with respect to the intensity of Ti for sediments from the forested site (Devils Lake, Wisconsin).

Figure 7

Figure 5. (color online) (a) Centered-log ratios of selected elements and (b) log ratios of element intensities with respect to the intensity of Ti for sediments from the grassland site (Fox Lake, Minnesota).

Figure 8

Figure 6. (color online) Cross plots of selected element abundances from the sedimentary sequence at the forested site (Devils Lake, Wisconsin) color coded by time.

Figure 9

Figure 7. (color online) Cross plots of selected element abundances from the sedimentary sequence at the grassland site (Fox Lake, Minnesota) color coded by time.

Figure 10

Figure 8. (color online) Principal components analysis of 21 variables measured on a sediment core spanning the entire sequence of ecosystem development following deglaciation ~17,000 yr from Devils Lake, Wisconsin. (a) Time series of principal components 1 and 2. (b) Score plot of principal components 1 and 2. Circles, data points; diamonds, eigenvectors for each of the variables.

Figure 11

Figure 9. (color online) Principal components analysis of 17 variables measured on a sediment core spanning 9200 yr of ecosystem development following deglaciation from Fox Lake, Minnesota. (a) Time series of principal components 1 and 2. (b) Score plot of principal components 1 and 2. Circles, data points; diamonds, eigenvectors for each of the variables.