Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:37:35.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions between immunity and metabolism – contributions from the metabolic profiling of parasite-rodent models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2010

J. SARIC*
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Dr. Jasmina Saric, Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, SW7 2AZ, London, UK, Tel.: +44 20 7594-3899; Fax: +44 20 7595-3220; E-mail: jasmina.saric@imperial.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A combined interdisciplinary research strategy is even more crucial in immunology than in many other biological sciences in order to comprehend the closely linked interactions between cell proliferation, molecular signalling and gene rearrangements. Because of the multi-dimensional nature of the immune system, an abundance of different experimental approaches has developed, with a main focus on cellular and molecular mechanisms. The role of metabolism in immunity has been underexplored so far, and yet researchers have made important contributions in describing associations of immune processes and metabolic pathways, such as the central role of the l-arginine pathway in macrophage activation or the immune regulatory functions of the nucleotides. Furthermore, metabolite supplement studies, including nutritional administration and labelled substrates, have opened up new means of manipulating immune mechanisms. Metabolic profiling has introduced a reproducible platform for systemic assessment of changes at the small-molecule level within a host organism, and specific metabolic fingerprints of several parasitic infections have been characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The application of multivariate statistical methods to spectral data has facilitated recovery of biomarkers, such as increased acute phase protein signals, and enabled direct correlation to the relative cytokine levels, which encourages further application of metabolic profiling to explore immune regulatory systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Cross-regulation between l-arginine and l-kynurenine pathways within a macrophage. l-arginine is substrate for three different reactions that result in the production of either l-citrulline and NO by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), urea and l-ornithine, or agmatine, whereas l-tryptophan degrades stepwise to NAD+. While IFN-γ stimulates expression of both key enzymes, iNOS and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), picolinic acid stimulates iNOS but inhibits IDO expression. Agmatine and l-hydroxy arginine both exert negative feedback on iNOS and arginase (arg), respectively and NO is an important inhibitor of IDO. The broken arrows indicate negative regulation and the solid arrows positive regulation. Key: 1, arginine decarboxylase; 2, agmatinase; 3, ornithine amino decarboxylase; 4, ornithine decarboxylase.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Link between the choline pathway and arachidonic acid cascade. The choline-containing intermediates can be metabolised to phosphorylcholine, which represents an important precursor for n-6 PUFA arachidonic acid and the subsequent production of pro-inflammatory mediators. (B) Alternative cascade of mediators derived from n-3 PUFAs eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which have certain anti-inflammatory functions and which can be competitively built into leukocytes. Adapted from Zeisel et al. (2003); Li and Vance (2008) and Calder (2008). Key: CDP-Cho, CDP-choline; Cho, choline; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; HE, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; Hp, hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid; LT, leukotriene; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, prostaglandin; PhCho, phosphocholine; PL, phospholipase; SM, sphingomyelin; TX, thromboxane.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Aliphatic region of a 1H NMR plasma spectrum obtained from a non-infected control female Wistar rat (A) and a gender and age-matched rat, infected with F. hepatica. Twenty-two days post-infection, (B) showing the relative differences in the N and O-acetyl glycoprotein resonance intensities. Key: 3HB, D-3-hydroxybutyrate; NAG1, N-acetyl glycoprotein fragment 1; NAG2, N-acetyl glycoprotein fragment 2; OAG, O-acetyl glycoprotein fragment.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. O-PLS-DA analysis between F. hepatica-infected rats and uninfected control animals at Day 22 post-infection (n=10), when differences between glycoprotein levels were found to be most significant. Upwards-pointing peaks illustrate positive correlation with the infection, and vice versa. The elevated levels in the infected animal reflect the higher production of acute phase proteins as a response to inflammation. Key: NAG1, N-acetyl glycoprotein fragment 1; NAG2, N-acetyl glycoprotein fragment 2; OAG, O-acetyl glycoprotein fragment.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. O-PLS correlation plot of relative IFN-γ levels and individually matched 1H NMR spectral plasma data obtained from mice pre-infection, and animals infected with P. berghei, at days 2 and 4 post infection (at each time-point n=5). The colour scale indicates the significance of the correlation, i.e., red peaks illustrate highest correlation between cytokine and metabolite levels. Upwards-pointing peaks show positive correlation, whereas downwards-pointing peaks indicate anti-correlation.

Figure 5

Table 1 Rodent metabolites commonly recovered by 1H NMR spectroscopy with established connection to immune regulatory networks