Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:57:23.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Binomial stub loaded compact Vivaldi antenna for superwideband applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2020

Abhik Gorai*
Affiliation:
School of Electronics Engineering, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India
Rowdra Ghatak
Affiliation:
ECE Dept, Microwave and Antenna Research Laboratory, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, West Bengal, India
*
Author for correspondence: Abhik Gorai, E-mail: abhik.gorai@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A compact antipodal Vivaldi antenna with superwideband characteristics is presented in this paper. For improved matching of input impedance at lower frequency region, techniques like binomial tapering of outer edges, binomial slit loaded outer edge, and protruded binomial tapered stub loading have been adopted. The antenna operates in a wide frequency range from 2 to 20 GHz. Experimental results show, stable radiation pattern with peak realized gain of more than 8 dBi, group delay within 1 ns, 164% fractional bandwidth, radiation efficiency of more than 90%, which are in good agreement with the simulated results. The compact size of the proposed antenna (1.14λ0 × 1.21λ0) with wide frequency bandwidth and directional radiation characteristics make it suitable for through-wall radar and medical imaging applications.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Layout of the proposed antenna, (b) details of various tapering profiles. Lsub = 38, Wsub = 40.4, Ws = 15.8, Lt = 12.08, Ls = 36, lf = 7, wf = 1.47, g = 1, tsl = 3.47, wstb = 7, lb = 17.22, ls = 13, wsl = 6.8, lsl = 7(in mm).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Evolution of the proposed AVA.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of variation of |S11| characteristics for different values of N.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effect of variation of |S11| characteristics for different values of N|.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Effect of variation of |S11| characteristics for different values of lsl.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Effect of variation of |S11| characteristics for different values of tsl.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Comparison of simulated and measured |S11| characteristics.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Current distribution at (a) 2.5 GHz, (b) 10 GHz, and (c) 18 GHz.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated and proposed radiation pattern of the proposed AVA in xz plane and yz plane at (a) 2 GHz, (b) 7 GHz, (c) 12 GHz, and (d) 20 GHz.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Simulated and measured gain and efficiency of the proposed antenna.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Group delay profile of the proposed AVA.

Figure 11

Table 1. Fidelity factors of the proposed AVA in two principle planes

Figure 12

Table 2. Comparison of the existing literature with the proposed antenna