Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:13:35.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genomes of two species of Clupeiformes and the phylogenetic implications for Clupeiformes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Bingjian Liu
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Ying Peng
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Kun Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
Yifan Liu
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Jiasheng Li
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Jian Chen
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Xuepeng Li
Affiliation:
School of Ocean, Yantai University, Yantai, China
Xun Jin
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Sixu Zheng
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Yunpeng Wang
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Shufei Zhang
Affiliation:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510300, China
Li Gong
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Zhenming Lü
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
Liqin Liu*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, 316022, Zhoushan, China
*
Author for correspondence: Liqin Liu, E-mail: liuliqin-666@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mitochondrial genome provides important information for phylogenetic analysis and an understanding of evolutionary origin. In this study, the mitochondrial genomes of Ilisha elongata and Setipinna tenuifilis were sequenced, which are typical circular vertebrate mitochondrial genomes composed of 16,770 and 16,805 bp, respectively. The mitogenomes of I. elongata and S. tenuifilis include 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes and one control region (CR). Both two species' genome compositions were highly A + T biased and exhibited positive AT-skews and negative GC-skews. The genetic distance and Ka/Ks ratio analyses indicated that 13 PCGs were affected by purifying selection and the selection pressures were different from certain deep-sea fishes, which were most likely due to the difference in their living environment. Results of phylogenetic analysis support close relationships among Chirocentridae, Denticipitidae, Clupeidae, Engraulidae and Pristigasteridae based on the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of 13 PCGs. Within Clupeoidei, I. elongata and S. tenuifilis were most closely related to the family Pristigasteridae and Engraulidae, respectively. These results will help to better understand the evolutionary position of Clupeiformes and provide a reference for further phylogenetic research on Clupeiformes species.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Figure 0

Table 1. List of 82 Clupeiformes and two outgroups used in this paper

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Mitochondrial genome map of Ilisha elongata and Setipinna tenuifilis.

Figure 2

Table 2. Annotations for the Ilisha elongata and Setipinna tenuifilis mitogenomes

Figure 3

Table 3. Nucleotide composition of Ilisha elongata and Setipinna tenuifilis mitogenomes

Figure 4

Fig. 2. The amino acid composition and RSCU in two mitogenomes. (A) Amino acid composition of Ilisha elongata mitogenomes. (B) The RSCU in Ilisha elongata mitogenomes. (C) Amino acid composition of Setipinna tenuifilis mitogenomes. (D) The RSCU in Setipinna tenuifilis mitogenomes. The x-axis of (A) and (C) plots represent the amino acid composition of the 13 protein-coding genes in the mitochondria of Ilisha elongata and Setipinna tenuifilis, respectively. The codon families are shown on the x-axis, and the RSCU values are shown on the y-axis in (B) and (D) plots.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. The rates of non-synonymous substitutions and synonymous substitutions for each PCG in the pairwise mitochondrial genome of Ilisha elongata (IE) and Setipinna tenuifilis (ST). The red boxes mark the genes with the lowest Ka/Ks among the 13 PCGs. The colour change from blue to red shows the change of Ka, Ks, Ka/Ks values from small to large.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. (A) The phylogenetic tree inferred from the nucleotide sequences of 13 mitogenome protein-coding genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap (ML) and posterior probability (BI). Star symbols indicate species in the study. (B) The phylogenetic tree inferred from the amino acids sequences obtained from 13 mitogenome protein-coding genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap (ML) and posterior probability (BI). Black dots indicate species in the study. The red box shows where the topology of the two methods of tree building differs significantly.

Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Liu et al. supplementary material

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.5 MB