Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T19:39:26.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highly selective, fractal-configured UWB-FSS for sub-6 GHz 5G, GSM, WLAN, and C band electromagnetic stealth application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Chandranath Chattopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers, Kolkata, India
Srimita Coomar
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Physics & Electronics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
Santanu Mondal
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Physics & Electronics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
Rajarshi Sanyal
Affiliation:
ECE Department, MCKV Institute of Engineering, Howrah, India
*
Corresponding author: Chandranath Chattopadhyay; E-mail: cchandranath22@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A miniaturized and flexible frequency-selective surface (FSS) has been presented in this article with a unit cell size of 0.049 λc × 0.049 λc where λc is the free space wavelength at the lower cut-off frequency. In order to achieve an ultra-wide (−3 dB) second order pass band of 151.3% with enhanced selectivity factor of 0.887, a cascaded triple layered hybrid resonating structure has been proposed with symmetrical Minkowski island-shaped fractal geometry pair and spiral-shaped middle layer in optimized air gap coupling. Furthermore, 149.8% ultra-wide pass band also ascertains the conformal feature of the proposed structure. In addition to this, the proposed FSS provides the stable angular response for both TE and TM polarization. An equivalent circuit model has been synthesized for accurate frequency response. Finally, a sample prototype has been fabricated to verify the experimental validation. Excellent angular stability under large oblique incident and significant conformal characteristics ensure the compatibility of the proposed structure for electromagnetic stealth in 0.9–1.8 GHz GSM band, 2.10–2.14 GHz wireless medical telemetry band, 2.4–2.5 and 4.9–5.8 GHz WLAN band, 3.4–3.7 and 4.4–4.9 GHz sub-6 GHz 5 G band, and 3.7–4.2 GHz C band.

Information

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Development of Minkowski island fractal geometry. (b) Double-layer side view of symmetrical iteration-2 fractal pair configuration with air gap separation. (c) Comparative frequency response of different iteration pair.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Proposed FSS geometry. (a) Top view of the top and bottom fractal configuration layer. (b) Top view of the middle spiral-shaped layer. (c) Side view of the proposed triple-layer FSS.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Frequency response of double- and triple-layered FSS. (b) Selectivity performance of the proposed FSS.

Figure 3

Table 1. Optimized dimension of the proposed FSS parameters

Figure 4

Figure 4. Influence of air gap separation in frequency response of the double-layered symmetrical Minkowski island fractal pair.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Equivalent Circuit model of double-layered Minkowski island fractal pair FSS. (b) Comparative transmission coefficient and (c) reflection coefficient of double-layered FSS at CST-MWS and ADS.

Figure 6

Table 2. Parameters of the equivalent circuit model

Figure 7

Figure 6. Influence of the spiral-shaped FSS modification on the primary in band transmission pole and out band transmission zeros.

Figure 8

Figure 7. (a) Equivalent circuit model of the proposed triple-layered FSS. (b) Transmission coefficient of the proposed triple-layered FSS at CST-MWS and ADS.

Figure 9

Figure 8. (a) Conformal structure of 4 × 4 proposed FSS lattice. (b) 2D view of conformal structure with cylindrical bending. (c) Frequency response of the proposed FSS with varying radius of curvature in TE mode. (d) Frequency response of the proposed FSS with varying radius of curvature in TM mode.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Simulated transmission coefficient of the proposed FSS for different incident angles at (a) TE polarization and (b) TM polarization.

Figure 11

Figure 10. (a) CST-MWS model of the proposed triple-layered cascaded FSS (D = 3.9 mm). (b) Transmission coefficient response of triple-layered FSS for different polarization angles under normal incidence. (c) CST-MWS model of the modified quad-layered cascaded FSS (g1 = 4.2 mm, g2 = 2.1 mm, g3 = 2.1 mm). (d) Transmission coefficient response of quad-layered FSS for different polarization angles under normal incidence.

Figure 12

Figure 11. (a) Fabricated planar prototype of Minkowski island-shaped fractal and spiral-shaped configuration. (b) Conformal structure of the proposed triple-layered FSS. (c) Free space measuring setup for planar FSS at 40° incidence angle.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Measured frequency response of (a) planar and (b) conformal configuration.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Simulated versus measured frequency response at various incident angles under TE polarization.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Spectral coverage of GSM, wireless medical telemetry, WLAN, sub-6 GHz 5G, and C bands for the frequency response of (a) planar structure at normal incidence, (b) conformal structure at normal incidence, and (c) planar structure at 45° incident angle.

Figure 16

Table 3. Comparative study of the proposed FSS with previously reported works