Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:59:57.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal processing and enthalpy storage of a binary amorphous solid: A molecular dynamics study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Peter M. Derlet*
Affiliation:
Condensed Matter Theory Group, Paul Scherrer Institut, PSI-Villigen 5232, Switzerland
Robert Maaß
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: peter.derlet@psi.ch

Abstract

Using very long molecular dynamics simulations of duration up to a microsecond of physical time, temperature protocols spanning up to five orders of magnitude in time are performed to investigate thermally activated structural relaxation in a model binary amorphous solid. The simulations demonstrate significant local structural excitations (LSE) as a function of increasing temperature and show that enthalpy rather than internal potential energy is primarily responsible for relaxation. At low temperatures these LSE involve atoms whose displacements are smaller than a typical bond length, whereas at higher temperatures approaching that of the glass transition regime, bond-length displacements occur in the form of string-like motion where one atom replaces the position of another. Such thermally activated excitations are observed to mainly involve the smaller atom type. The observed enthalpy changes can be correlated with the level of internal hydrostatic stress homogenization and icosahedral content within the glassy solid.

Information

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Potential energy per atom and (b) icosahedral percentage as a function of decreasing temperature of the quenched and the quench-relaxed samples. The quenched curve involves a direct linear quench from a high temperature equilibrium liquid configuration, whereas the quench-relaxed curve is interrupted by a fixed temperature relaxation protocol just below the glass transition regime. For the latter, only the subsequent linear quench data is shown.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Pair distribution function and (b) coordination histogram of the quenched, quench relaxed, and 109 MD step samples.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) Linear ramping protocol from a 0 K amorphous structure showing the potential energy per atom as a function of temperature in the vicinity of the glass transition. Data is shown for the four considered ramp rates for both the quenched and quench-relaxed samples. For easier viewing, the quench-relaxed data is shifted upwards by 0.2ε. (b) The derivative of the potential energy of the slowest ramp rate for the quenched sample, giving the heat capacity at constant volume.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Linear temperature ramping protocol from a 0 K amorphous structure showing the CG-q (a) potential energy per atom and (b) icosahedral percentage as a function of temperature. Data is shown for the four considered ramp rates.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Atomic displacement map at (a) the temperature T = 0.17TG, showing one local group of atoms undergoing a structural transformation (with atoms undergoing the largest displacements circled) and (b) at the temperature 0.48TG, showing several local groups of atoms undergoing a structural transformation. Here each vector indicates the atomic displacement and each ball (large/small corresponding to atoms of type 1/2) indicates the initial position of the associated atom. Only atoms whose displacement is greater than 0.1σ11 and 0.4σ11 are respectively shown in (a) and (b). In (a) four different view directions are given as defined by the indicated orthogonal axes shown in each sub-panel. Visualization is via OVITO.46 In (a) a scale bar is given in terms of the length unit σ11 and in (b) the bounding box represents the three-dimensional periodic simulation cell which has a side length of 29.0613σ11.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Global stress components as a function of temperature for the CG-q configurations of the (a) quenched and (b) quench-relaxed samples at the Q−2 ramp rate.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. (a) Instantaneous potential energy per atom as a function of molecular dynamics iteration number performed at a temperature of 0.95TG. (b) Zero Kelvin potential energy and enthalpy as a function of icosahedral content. Each data point represents a configuration which has been quenched (at the rate QLQ) from configurations at T = 0.95TG, taken at various points along the relaxation curve of (a). Also shown in (b) is the energy/enthalpy versus icosahedral content for the slowest temperature ramp for the quenched and quench-relaxed samples (derived from the data in Figs. 4 and 6—here, only the temperature range for which relaxation occurs is included).

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Histograms of local pressure for two quenched samples taken after 105 and 109 molecular dynamics iterations of the relaxation simulation shown in Fig. 7(a).