Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:33:37.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some further observations regarding “cryoplanation terraces” on Alexander Island

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Kevin Hall*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
Marie-Françoise André
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de géographie physique, Université Blaise Pascal, UMR 6042 - CNRS, 4 rue Ledru, 63057 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landforms with the appearance of cryoplanation terraces were studied on Alexander Island in an attempt to better understand their formation and growth. Developed on sub-horizontal sedimentary rocks, with 360° exposure around a nunatak, the terraces show a distinct equatorward orientational preference and an increase in terrace size with elevation. Available data fail to indicate any evidence of freeze-thaw weathering and information relating to present-day debris transport is singularly absent. Thermal data from the rock exposures showed variability that could cause thermal fatigue but no rates of change of temperature commensurate with thermal shock were recorded. Terrace development appears to be connected with lithological differences in the local sandstones, with growth along sedimentary junctions. Although presently in a permafrost environment, the available information on these landforms does not appear to be compatible with that generally accepted for cryoplanation terraces.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Location of the study area (from an aerial photograph).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 General view across to Syrtis Hill showing the spatial distribution of terraces.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Rock surface temperatures for dark sandstone risers. The darker line is from a south-facing riser and the lighter line from a north-facing riser.

Figure 3

Table I Porosimetry data for the two sandstones.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Rock surface thermal data to show the variability as a function of aspect, slope and rock type. Red line is a north-facing dark sandstone riser, green line is a north-facing light sandstone riser, grey is a south-facing dark sandstone riser, blue is a horizontal dark sandstone surface, brown is a horizontal light sand stone surface, and black is the air temperature.

Figure 5

Table II Terrace dimensions (maximum step height and width) and details of spacing for jointing and bedding on each terrace.

Figure 6

Table III Joint spacing for the light and dark sandstones.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 An example of the limited amplitude and extent of a south-facing dark sandstone riser.

Figure 8

Fig. 6 An example of the large amplitude and extent of the north-facing terraces.

Figure 9

Fig. 7 Cross section to show the upper series of terraces facing to the north-west on Syrtis Hill (not to scale).

Figure 10

Fig. 8 The T6–T9 series of terraces wherein T7 and T8 are suggested to be part of the development of T6 into T9: a. detail of the rock riser along a dark sandstone exposure at the T6–T7 break, and b. view across the T6 to T9 series of terraces.

Figure 11

Fig. 9 View downslope of the T1–T2 terraces to show the beginning of small terraces lower down the slope and the absence of any terrace formation at the slope base.