Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:21:33.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early oral feeding following total laryngectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2008

J Aswani
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
M Thandar
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
J Otiti
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
J Fagan*
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
*
Address for correspondence: Professor J J Fagan, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Cape Town, H-53 OMB, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa. E-mail: johannes.fagan@uct.ac.za Fax: +27 (0) 21 448 8865
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine whether, in a developing world context, early oral feeding after laryngectomy is safe, cost-effective and appropriate.

Study design:

A prospective study of early oral feeding after laryngectomy, compared with retrospective, historical delayed feeding controls.

Method:

Forty patients underwent total laryngectomy for advanced carcinoma of the larynx with or without hypopharyngeal involvement, not requiring tongue base resection or myocutaneous flaps, and were commenced on oral feeding on the second post-operative day. Thirty-nine laryngectomy patients previously managed in the same unit who had received conventional, delayed oral feeding served as controls.

Results:

Pharyngocutaneous fistulae developed in 20 per cent of the early feeding patients, compared with 15.4 per cent of the delayed oral feeding controls (p = 0.592). For patients who did not develop fistulae, hospitalisation was shorter in the early oral feeding group (p = 0.007).

Conclusion:

Early oral feeding for laryngectomy patients is recommended, both in developed and developing countries.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008
Figure 0

Table I Early feeding protocol

Figure 1

Table II Possible risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula development

Figure 2

Table III Pharyngocutaneous fistula development in early vs delayed oral feeding groups

Figure 3

Table IV Patients' median length of hospital stay

Figure 4

Table V Reported pharyngocutaneous fistula rates for delayed postlaryngectomy oral feeding

Figure 5

Table VI Studies of early vs delayed postlaryngectomy feeding, and meta-analysis