Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T14:05:51.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Audit: Review of 72-Hour Formulation Meetings on Adult Mental Health Ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2026

Omeno Ohene
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust, Darlington, United Kingdom
Mubeena Sirajudeen
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust, Darlington, United Kingdom
Ijeoma Akuma-Akpu
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust, Darlington, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Aims:

Background:

Timely multidisciplinary formulation meetings are a cornerstone of patient-centred care in mental health inpatient settings. TEWV NHS Foundation Trust standards recommend completion within 72 hours of admission, with full MDT participation. This audit aimed to evaluate compliance with these standards on Maple Ward, identify delays, and assess attendance patterns to inform quality improvement.

Methods:

A retrospective audit was conducted on 67 cases admitted to Maple Ward between January and August 2025. Data were extracted from audit registries and case notes. Variables included admission and formulation dates, attendance by role, and documentation completeness. Descriptive statistics summarized timeliness and attendance. Correlation and linear regression analyses explored associations between delay and team composition.

Results:

Timeliness: Mean interval from admission to formulation was 4.9 days (median: 4; range: 1–10 days). Only 27% of cases met the 72-hour standard, indicating low compliance.

Attendance: Consultants (100%), nurses (97%), patients (93%), and resident doctors (91%) were most frequently present. Psychologists (13%) and occupational therapists (25%) attended infrequently; carers were present in 46% of sessions.

Associations: Team size showed negligible correlation with delay (r ≈ 0.03). Regression analysis indicated attendance variables did not significantly predict timeliness (Adjusted R² ≈ –0.038; p ≈ 0.71).

Documentation: Major gaps included missing documentation of assessment of capacity (91%), legal status (55%), and clinical impression (49%).

Compliance Level: 27%.

Conclusion:

The audit reveals systemic delays and limited psychosocial input in formulation meetings. Attendance patterns suggest strong core clinical presence but weak representation from psychology and Occupational therapy. Documentation gaps further compromise quality.

Recommendations

Improvement strategies include:

  • • Early scheduling triggers and escalation for delays beyond 72 hours; daily updating of patient board and discussion at report-outs.

  • • Protected daily formulation slots (Actioned by Ward Manager and Administrative staff)

  • • Ensure Full involvement and participation of all multidisciplinary team members especially for complex cases.

  • • Develop a standardized documentation template and induction for resident doctors.

Information

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.