Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T17:06:26.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stable Isotopes and Debris in Basal Glacier Ice, South Georgia, Southern Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David E. Sugden
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Scotland
Chalmers M. Clapperton
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen AB9 2UF, Scotland
J. Campbell Gemmell
Affiliation:
Christ Church College, University of Oxford, Oxford 0X1 1DP, England
Peter G. Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Keele, Keele ST5 5BG, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper combines a study of the rock debris and δD/δ18O isotopic characteristics of basal ice sequences in three representative glaciers in South Georgia and concludes that the debris and ice has been entrained mainly by basal freezing. The size distribution of the rock debris is typical of crushing and abrasion, and reflects transport at the ice–rock interface. The δD/δ18O relationships show that clear ice associated with the debris has accreted through freezing. The white bubbly glacier ice has δD/δ18O relationships typical of precipitation which demonstrates an altitudinal effect between glaciers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1987
Figure 0

Fig. 1.The location of the three glaciers in South Georgia.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Lyell Glacier looking south towards Paulsen Peak, March 1982. Showing the widespread cover of surface rock-fall material. The basal ice was sampled at the land-bound parts of the snout to the left (east) and the right (west) of the photograph.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.The basal debris-bearing sequence at the western edge of the snout of Nordenskjöld Glacier, February 1985. The person is at the upper junction of the sequence. White bubbly ice above is covered with a veneer of surface rock-fall material.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Profile and sample sites. Nordenskjöld Glacier, February 1985. The debris contents (by weight) of the debris bands were: N3, 83.5%: N5, 62.8%; N7, 69.2%; N10, 91.8%. The debris contents of the intervening laminated ice layers were: N4, 8.2%; N6, 2.6%; N8, 8.8%; N9, 4.9%.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Grain-size distribution of debris finer than 32–16 mm in (a) the Nordenskjöld Glacier profile, (b) Hodges Glacier, and (c) artificially crushed greywacke and volcaniclastic rocks. Samples of the latter were passed through spring-loaded rollers five times. The main features of the curves shown were achieved on the second pass. Thereafter there was a more gradual reduction of grain-size, especially the coarser fraction.

Figure 5

Table IDebris content of basal ice in some south georgia glaciers, given by weight % and g per litre of water melted. ice facies after lawson (1979)

Figure 6

Fig. 6.The location of debris and isotopic samples on Hodges Glacier. (a) The glacier as a whole, and (b) details of the basal ice sequence near the snout. Concentration of debris is given in brackets.

Figure 7

Fig. 7.Sedimentary layers exposed in a longitudinal crevasse on Hodges Glacier, February 1985. The camera on the ice measures 15 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm.

Figure 8

Fig. 8.δD/δ18O values obtained from the three South Georgia glaciers. They are grouped by glacier and by ice type.

Figure 9

Fig. 9.The regression line drawn through δD/δ18O values for the debris-bearing ice. Nordenskjöld Glacier (correlation coefficient = 0.98) compared to a precipitation slope of 8. The slope of 6.4 differs from the precipitation slope of pure glacier ice and demonstrates it has undergone refreezing.