Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T20:51:29.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short versus long treatment duration for streptococcal bloodstream infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2025

Julie Gray
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT, USA
Chong Zhang
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health and School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Ali Earl
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Emily S. Spivak*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
*
Corresponding author: Emily S. Spivak; Email: Emily.spivak@hsc.utah.edu.

Abstract

Background:

Emerging data surrounding the rise in antimicrobial resistance have prompted a shift towards shorter antibiotic durations. Studies show similar clinical outcomes comparing shorter antibiotic courses to longer ones for uncomplicated Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSI). However, there is a lack of data to inform durations of therapy for Streptococcal BSI.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to University of Utah Health with uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effects (ATE) of antibiotics administered for 10 days or fewer (short duration) versus more than 10 days (long duration). The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent BSI, all-cause mortality, and readmissions at 30 days from end of therapy.

Results:

Five hundred patients were screened and 196 were included in the final analysis. The most common sources were skin and soft tissue infections. The median duration in the short and long groups were 8 (IQR, 7–10) and 15 days (IQR, 14–17), respectively. The ATE of short versus long duration of antibiotics was not significant for the composite primary outcome (18% vs 18%; OR = 1.42 [95% CI: 0.57 to 3.53]).

Conclusions:

We found no appreciable difference in outcomes between patients treated with short versus long antibiotic durations for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Given low absolute rates of mortality and recurrent BSI, along with the lack of evidence indicating a significant difference related to treatment duration, it is reasonable to consider shorter durations. Future research is needed to confirm our findings.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Figure 1.Absolute standardized mean difference.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Consort diagram.

Figure 2

Table 1.Baseline characteristics

Figure 3

Table 2.Primary and secondary outcomes