Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:38:55.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Piercing associated perichondritis of the pinna: are we treating it correctly?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Z W Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Colchester General Hospital, UK
P Chokkalingam
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Colchester General Hospital, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Z W Liu, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Essex County Hospital, Lexden Rd, Colchester CO3 3NB, UK E-mail: zwl20cam@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This paper reports a series of patients with sporadic pinna perichondritis who presented to a district general hospital over a period of 10 years. The data examined included the causative organism, risk factors and pattern of antibiotic use.

Method:

A retrospective analysis of diagnosed cases of pinna perichondritis from 2001 to 2012 was performed. A literature review of pinna perichondritis was carried out using Pubmed with the key words ‘pinna perichondritis’, ‘pinna abscess’, ‘pinna infection’ and ‘piercing’.

Results:

Pinna perichondritis was more likely to result from chondral than lobe piercings. The majority of cases were caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusion:

Most patients were not prescribed anti-pseudomonal antibiotics on presentation. This may result in persistent infection and long-term cosmetic defects.

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 
Figure 0

Table I Case series summary*

Figure 1

Table II Literature review summary*