Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:59:52.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An unusual cause of nasal airway obstruction in a neonate: trans-sellar, trans-sphenoidal cephalocoele

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2011

R A Steven*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
M P Rothera
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
V Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
I A Bruce
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr R A Steven, Department of Paediatric OtolaryngologyRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, United KingdomM13 9WL E-mail: richardsteven@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Neonates are obligate nasal breathers, and nasal obstruction may have serious implications. We present an extremely rare cause of neonatal nasal obstruction, and its management.

Case report:

An eight-day-old neonate was referred for upper airway obstruction. Initial investigations had identified no obvious cause. Rigid airway endoscopy revealed a large, cystic lesion appearing to arise from the roof of the posterior nasal space. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging indicated a basal cephalocoele projecting inferiorly into the oropharynx, with an intracranial connection to the pituitary fossa. Histology showed fibrovascular tissue lined on one aspect by respiratory type epithelium, with mucous glands present. The tissue contained multiple cystic spaces lined by choroid plexus epithelium, with glial tissue present in the walls of the mass. A transpalatal excision of the nasopharyngeal cephalocoele, with closure of the intracranial connection, palatal repair and lumbar drain placement was undertaken. Post-operative recovery was uneventful, with no evidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage or palatal dysfunction.

Conclusion:

This surgical approach gave excellent access whilst avoiding the obvious morbidity associated with an intracranial approach. Nasal masses should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress due to nasal obstruction.

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Sagittal computed tomography scan showing a lesion of fluid density with intracranial extension (short arrow). No neural tissue is seen within the mass. Obstruction of the nasopharynx and oropharynx can be seen with endotracheal tube in situ. An area in the superior aspect of the posterior nasal cavity was also suggested as a possible abnormality (long arrow), but was thought to represent mucus lying within the nasal cavity.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Axial computed tomography scan showing the lesion's intracranial connection (arrow).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Sagittal, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan showing better characterisation of the lesion. The large nasopharyngeal mass can be seen to connect with the pituitary fossa. The anterior area identified on the computed tomography scan (see Figure 1) shows a small area of high signal change but no neural tissue; this may represents retained mucus in the nasal cavity.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Surgical photograph showing the transpalatal incision, with the underlying cephalocoele visible (arrow).

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Surgical photograph following cephalocoele removal, with the underlying bony defect visible (arrow).