Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:35:43.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of plant functional types to environmental gradients in the south-west Ethiopian highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2011

Desalegn Wana*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 150178, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Carl Beierkuhnlein
Affiliation:
University of Bayreuth, Department of Biogeography, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany
*
1Corresponding author. Email: desalegn.wana@uni-bayreuth.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Plant functional types across environmental gradients can be considered as a powerful proxy that reveals vegetation–environment relationships. The objectives of this study were to investigate the response in the relative abundance of plant functional types along altitudinal gradients and to examine the relationship of plant functional types to environmental variables. The study was conducted in the Gughe-Amaro Mountains, in the south-west Ethiopian highlands. We established 74 plots with an area of 400 m2 (20 × 20 m) each along altitudinal ranges between 1000 and 3000 m asl. Data on site environmental conditions and on the abundance of plant functional types were analysed using the constrained linear ordination technique (RDA) in order to identify the relationships between plant functional types and environmental variables. Altitude, soil organic carbon, soil sand fraction and surface stone cover were significantly related to the relative abundance of plant functional types across the gradient. Tussocks and thorns/spines were abundant in lower altitudinal ranges in response to herbivory and drought while rhizomes and rosettes were abundant at higher altitudes in response to the cold. Generally our results show that topographic attributes (altitude and slope) as well as soil organic carbon play an important role in differentiating the relative abundance of plant functional types in the investigated gradient. Thus, considering specific plant functional types would provide a better understanding of the ecological patterns of vegetation and their response to environmental gradients in tropical regions of Africa prone to drought.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the study area in the southern part of the Ethiopian rift valley with locations of plots for data collection.

Figure 1

Table 1. Classification of plant functional types (PFTs) and number of species per group.

Figure 2

Table 2. Constrained linear ordination analysis (canonical RDA) of plant functional types and the amount of variance explained (species data were log(x+1)-transformed, scaling with inter-species correlations and standardized by species centring), PFTs refers to plant functional types.

Figure 3

Table 3. The relationships among environmental variables and plant functional types based on Partial Monte Carlo permutation tests (** = significant at P ≤ 0.01, * = significant at P < 0.05); SOC stands for soil organic carbon, Alt = altitude, Stone = surface stone cover, C:N = carbon:nitrogen ratio, AP = available phosphorus).

Figure 4

Figure 2. A redundancy analysis of plant functional types and environmental variables; growth forms (a), biotic interactions/stress (b), temporal attributes (c) and nutrient- and water-related plant functional types (d); SOC = soil organic carbon, AP = available phosphorus, Alt = Altitude, Stone = surface stone cover.

Figure 5

Appendix 1. Species and plant functional types. Abrevations: Cl = Climber, Rh = Rhizomes/stolons, Nf = Nitrogen fixers, An = Annuals, He = Herbs, Ro = Rosettes, Pa = Parasites, De = Deciduous, Wo = Woody, Th = Thorns/spines, Su = Succulents, Ev = Evergreens, Fe = Ferns, Tu = Tussocks, Pe = Perennials, Gr = Graminoids, Na = No adaptation/does not fit into the specified strategies.