Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:22:01.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanostructured cerium oxide: preparation, characterization, and application in energy and environmental catalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2016

Wen-Xiang Tang
Affiliation:
Nanomaterials Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering & Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3136, USA
Pu-Xian Gao*
Affiliation:
Nanomaterials Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering & Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3136, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Pu-Xian Gao at puxian.gao@uconn.edu

Abstract

Nanostructured cerium oxide (CeO2) with outstanding physical and chemical properties has attracted extensive interests over the past few decades in environment and energy-related applications. With controllable synthesis of nanostructured CeO2, much more features were technologically brought out from defect chemistry to structure-derived effects. This review highlights recent progress on the synthesis and characterization of nanostructured ceria-based materials as well as the traditional and new applications. Specifically, several typical applications based on the desired ceria nanostructures are focused to showcase the importance of nanostructure-derived effects. Moreover, some challenges and perspectives on the nanostructured ceria are presented, such as defects controlling and retainment, scale-up fabrication, and monolithic devices. Hopefully, this review can provide an improved understanding of nanostructured CeO2 and offer new opportunities to promote the further research and applications in the future.

Information

Type
Functional Oxides Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Atomic configurations of the unit cell and the {100}, {110}, and {111} facets of CeO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 1, copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (i) TEM images of CeO2 nanocrystals. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 11, copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (ii) TEM and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of ceria nanocubes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 8, copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (iii) TEM and HRTEM images of square ceria nanoplates (general, stacking, elongated and stacking elongated). Reprinted with permission from Ref. 14, copyright 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (i) Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and TEM images of CeO2 nanospheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 16, copyright 2012 Springer. (ii) TEM and HRTEM images of CeO2 mesoporous spheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 19, copyright 2008 American Chemical Society. (iii) Microstructure of CeO2 nanospheres doped with 12 at.% of Ti. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 20, copyright 2006 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (i) TEM images of SiO2 templates (A, B), SiO2@CeO2 (C, D), @CeO2 (E, F) spheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 23, copyright 2009 American Chemical Society. (ii) (a–d) TEM images of ceria hollow nanospheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 26, copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (i) TEM, HRTEM, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) images of the template-free CeO2 sample. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 31, copyright 2008 American Chemical Society. (ii) (A) TEM images of initial colloidal SiO2 and ceria-3. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 32, copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (i) SEM and TEM images of the urchin-like and coral-like Ce-(HCOO)3 precursors. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 36, copyright 2011 Royal Society of Chemistry. (ii) SEM images of hierarchical CeO2 nanostructures. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 39, copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (i) Schematic illustration of 3D configurated nano-array catalysts, and typical morphology and structure of metal oxide (left to right: ZnO nanorod arrays on stainless steel, and TiO2 nanorod arrays, CeO2 nanotube arrays, and Co3O4 porous nanowire arrays) nano-arrays on monoliths. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 40, copyright 2013 Elsevier. (ii) SEM images of porous CeO2 deposits. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 50, copyright 2008 American Chemical Society. (iii) SEM images and x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of porous CeO2 NWAs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 51, copyright 2010 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration for the formation of ultrathin CeO2 sheets with numerous surface pits and intact ultrathin CeO2 sheets. (b–d) HRTEM and AFM images. (e) Overhead and top views of schematic structures for the three-atom-thick CeO2 sheets with a pit size of 0.90 nm × 0.82 nm; the CO molecules prefer to adsorb at P2 site, while the O2 molecules tend to adsorb and dissociate at the adjacent P1 sites. (f–g) Catalytic performance for CO oxidation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 55, copyright 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 8

Figure 9. (i) (a) SEM, TEM, high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)–STEM, HRTEM, and XRD mapping images of Au@CeO2 microspheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 60, copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry. (ii) (a), (c), and (d): TEM images; (b) inside; (b) and (e) STEM image; (f) and (g) mapping analysis of the as-obtained Pd@CeO2 core@shell nanospheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 65, copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. (iii) HAADF–STEM images with the corresponding mapping profile of Pt@CeO2 nanocomposite. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 72, copyright 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 9

Figure 10. (i) Schematic representation of the agglomeration of Pd@CeO2 structures when using the pristine alumina (a) and their deposition as single units after treatment of the same support with triethoxy(octyl)silane (TEOOS) (b). (ii) TEM investigations of Pd@CeO2 core–shell structures dispersed on hydrophobic alumina. (a) HAADF–STEM image after calcining to 500 °C for 5 h and (b) to 850 °C for 5 h. (c) EDS spot analysis of the indicated particles. (d) High magnification HAADF–STEM image of the Pd@CeO2/H-Al2O3 catalysts calcined to 500 °C and (e) the corresponding EDS line profile together with a model. (f) HRTEM image of a single Pd@CeO2 structure on the Pd@CeO2/H-Al2O3 catalysts calcined to 500 °C. (iii) CH4 conversion against the temperature for the three catalyst formulations used. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 93, copyright 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 10

Figure 11. (i) HRTEM images of C-Cl (a) view along [001], R-Cl (b), and R-NO (c) view along [110]. Insets are corresponding SAED patterns. Geometric models of CeO2 nanocubes and nanorods (d). (ii) Photocatalytic degradation of propane (a) and propene (b). Oxygen evolution from water in the presence of AgNO3 (c). Temporal evolution of fluorescence intensity at 426 nm (d). The notes inside each panel are the apparent reactivity orders before normalized by the BET surface areas. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 123, copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Specific CH4 evolution activities of CP0, CP1, CP2, and CP3 (0.5 %wt Pt, 0.5 %wt MnOx loaded) (a); CH4 and O2 generation rates of CP0, CP1, CP2, and CP3 with 0.5 %wt Pt loaded (b). Reproduced with permission from Ref. 39, copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Figure 12

Figure 13. (i) SEM images along with schematic representations of the bare YSZ matrix (panel A), Pd@CeO2 nanoparticles deposited on a clean YSZ porous electrode (panel B) and silanated YSZ porous electrode (panel C). Uncoated Pd nanoparticles (2 nm) deposited on silanated YSZ porous electrode (panel D). All samples calcined at 973 K in air, and the magnification is the same in all the images. (ii) SEM images, with the schematic representation of the agglomeration of Pd@CeO2 (panel A) and 2 nm uncoated Pd (panel B) nanoparticles deposited on silanated YSZ porous electrode after samples calcined at 1373 K in air. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 131, copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 13

Figure 14. (i) Selected cross-section FE-SEM micrographs of CeO2-based specimens obtained at different substrate temperatures. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 137, copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (ii) Response of columnar ceria nanostructures deposited on Al2O3 at 400 °C to: (a) CH3CH2OH; (b) NO2. In both cases, the working temperature and relative humidity were 200 °C and 40%, respectively. Response of a continuous ceria layer deposited on Al2O3 at 400 °C to: (c) CH3CH2OH; (d) NO2. In both cases, the working temperature and relative humidity were 200 °C and 40%, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 138, copyright 2007 IOP publishing.

Figure 14

Figure 15. (i) (a) Schematics of the fabrication of PANI hydrogel/CeO2 core/shell gas sensors. (b) SEM image of CPA4 shows well-defined core/shell structure in proper CeO2/aniline ratio. (c) SEM image of CPA0.5 exhibits three-dimensional network structure by existing homogeneously grown PANI hydrogel. (ii) (a) Response curves of CPA0.5 to CPA6 upon sequential exposure of 50, 75, and 100 ppm of NH3. (b) Fitted curves (solid lines) and experimental results (scattered points) of CPA4 to 50, 75, 100 ppm of NH3. (c) Reversible and reproducible responses of CPA4 to different concentrations of NH3. Inset is transient response of sequential exposure to 2, 4, 8, and 16 ppm of NH3. (d) Response and response time of CPA4 to various NH3 concentrations. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 139, copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.