Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:28:54.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A tale of two statues in Astana: the fuzzy process of nationalistic city making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Adrien Fauve
Adrien Fauve*
Affiliation:
CERI-SciencesPo., 56 rue Jacob, 75006 Paris, France
*
* Email: adrien.fauve@sciencespo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In the summer of 2009, statues stood leaning in a yard, beyond Independence Square in Astana. The situation was incongruous and constituted an enigma: Why were these monuments left alone in shambles? This paper argues that nationalistic city making is more of a resource for people involved in patron/client relationships and a contingent outcome, rather than a planned strategy. This case study, drawing on evidence gathered through qualitative methods with artists and urban-planners, hence reveals a paradox: in Kazakhstan, there surely is a state incentive to produce nationalistic symbols, but in the absence of a mid-term strategy, city-planners and the people they work with improvise in order to answer local authorities' demands, and use this opportunity to advance their own interests. Hence, the political production of space is considered a fuzzy process, contingent on the agency of multiple subjects, and treated as an outcome of Foucauldian “micro-physics of power.” But even though it is erratic, it still creates the built environment which will be reacted upon by citizens. Finally, this sociopolitical perspective on nationalistic urbanism demonstrates that Astana's scenery is a fuzzy “landscape of power” instituting an erratic Kazakhstani regime, based on the political economy of symbolic goods.

Keywords

monumentsurban landscapenationalismcapital cityauthoritarianismclientelism

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , May 2015, pp. 383 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

References

Alberti, Leon Battista. 2004 [1485]. L'art d'édifier. French translation from Latin by Caye, P. and Choay, F. [De re aedificatoria. 1485]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Alexander, Catherine. 2007. “Almaty: Rethinking the Public Sector.” In Urban Life in Post-Soviet Asia, edited by Catherine Alexander, Victor Buchli, and Humphrey, Caroline, 70–101. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bissenova, Alima. 2013. “The Master Plan of Astana: Between the Art of Government and the Art of Being Global.” In Ethnographies of the State in Central Asia: Performing Politics, edited by Reeves Madeleine, Rasanayagam John, and Judith, Beyer, 127–148. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by Richardson, John G., 241–258. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Buchli, Victor. 2007. “Astana: Materiality and the City.” In Urban Life in Post-Soviet Asia, edited by Catherine Alexander, Victor Buchli, and Humphrey, Caroline, 49–69. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Charle, Christophe, ed. 2004. Capitales européennes et rayonnement culturel XVIIIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Editions de la rue d'Ulm.Google Scholar
Choay, Françoise. 2006. Le De re aedificatoria et l'institutionnalisation de la société. Les Cahiers de l'Ecole d'architecture de Saint-Etienne, Université de Saint-Etienne 1:11–33.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, and Friedberg, Erhard. 1980 [1977]. Actors and Systems: the Politics of Collective Action. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, Sally. 2009. Symbolism and Power in Central Asia. Politics of the Spectacular, ed., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerard, Delanty, and Paul, Jones. 2002. “European Identity and Architecture.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (4): 453–466.Google Scholar
Déloye, Yves. 2013. “National Identity and Every Day Life.” In Oxford Handbook of History of Nationalism, edited by Breuilly, Jean, 615–631. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forest, Benjamin, and Johnson, Juliet. 2002. “Unraveling the Threads of History: Soviet-Era Monuments and Post-Soviet National Identity in Moscow.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (3): 524–547.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité 1. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. “How is power exercised?” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul, 216–226. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. “Centers, Kings, and Charisma. Reflections on the Symbolics of Power.” In Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, edited by Clifford, Geertz, 121–146. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grant, Bruce. 2001. “New Moscow Monuments, or, State of Innocence.” American Ethnologist 28 (2): 332–362.Google Scholar
Hackman, Jörg. 2009. “Mapping Tallinn after Communism: Modernist Architecture as Representation of a Small Nation.” In Cities After the Fall of Communism. Reshaping Cultural Landscapes and European Identity, edited by Czaplicka, John, Gelazis, Nilda, and Ruble, Blair, 105–136. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1979. “Monument and Myth.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (3): 362–381.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: the Transformation in Urban Governance and in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler 71b (1): 3–17.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Rico. 2011. Party system formation in Kazakhstan, between formal and informal politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Rico. 2014. “Nomads, warriors and bureaucrats: nation-building and film in post-Soviet Kazakhstan.” Nationalities Papers 43 (3): 399–416.Google Scholar
Johnson, Nuala. 1995. “Cast in Stone: monuments, geography and nationalism.” Environment and Planning D 13 (1): 51–65.Google Scholar
Koch, Natalie. 2010. “The monumental and the miniature: Imagining ‘modernity’ in Astana.” Social and Cultural Geography 11 (8): 769–787.Google Scholar
Koch, Natalie. 2012. “Urban ‘utopias': the Disney stigma and discourses of ‘false modernity'.” Environment and Planning A 44 (10): 2445–2462.Google Scholar
Laszczkowski, Mateusz. 2011. “Building the Future: Construction, Temporality and Politics in Astana.” Focaal 60 (1): 77–92.Google Scholar
Laszczkowski, Mateusz. 2013. “State Building(s): Built Forms, Materiality and the State in Astana.” In Ethnographies of the State in Central Asia: Performing Politics, edited by Reeves Madeleine, Rasanayagam John, and Judith, Beyer, 149–172. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Low, Setha M. 1999a. “Introduction: Theorizing the City.” In The New Urban Anthropology Reader, edited by Low, Setha M., 1–33. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Low, Setha M. 1999b. “Spatializing Culture: The Social Production and Social Construction of Public Space in Costa Rica.” In The New Urban Anthropology Reader, edited by Low, Setha M., 11–137. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1990. “Everyday Metaphors of Power.” Theory and Society 19 (5): 545–577.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Don and Staeheli, Lynn. 2009. “Turning Social Relations into Space: Property, Law and the Plaza of Sante Fe, New Mexico.” In Justice, Power and the Political Landscape, edited by Olwig, Kenneth R. and Mitchell, Don, 77–89. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Trong Hiep. 1897. Paris, capitale de la France. Hanoi.Google Scholar
Olwig, Kenneth and Mitchell, Don. 2009. “Introduction to part two.” In Justice, Power and the Political Landscape, edited by Olwig, Kenneth and Mitchell, Don, 143–150. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reeves, Madeleine, Rasanayagam, John, Beyer, Judith, eds. 2013. Ethnographies of the State in Central Asia: Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1973. “Cities, States and Nations: a Dimensional Model for the Contrasts in Development.” In Building States and Nations, Vol. 1, edited by Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. and Rokkan, Stein, 73–97. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009a. “The Soft Authoritarian ‘Tool Kit': Agenda-Setting Power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.” Comparative Politics 41 (2): 203–222.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward, ed. 2009b. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1975. Center and Periphery. Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suraganova, S. 2009. Obmen darami v kazahskoj tradicionnoj kul'ture [Gift exchange in Kazakh traditional culture], Astana.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vale, Lawrence. 1992. Architecture, Power and National Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, Michiel. 2000. “Townscapes of Power.” GeoJournal 51 (1–2): 3–13.Google Scholar