Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T16:15:51.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nucleic acid transfection and transgenesis in parasitic nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2011

JAMES B. LOK*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Tel: +1215-898-7892. Fax: +1 215-573-7023. E-mail: jlok@vet.upenn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Transgenesis is an essential tool for assessing gene function in any organism, and it is especially crucial for parasitic nematodes given the dwindling armamentarium of effective anthelmintics and the consequent need to validate essential molecular targets for new drugs and vaccines. Two of the major routes of gene delivery evaluated to date in parasitic nematodes, bombardment with DNA-coated microparticles and intragonadal microinjection of DNA constructs, draw upon experience with the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Bombardment has been used to transiently transfect Ascaris suum, Brugia malayi and Litomosoides sigmodontis with both RNA and DNA. Microinjection has been used to achieve heritable transgenesis in Strongyloides stercoralis, S. ratti and Parastrongyloides trichosuri and for additional transient expression studies in B. malayi. A third route of gene delivery revisits a classic method involving DNA transfer facilitated by calcium-mediated permeabilization of recipient cells in developing B. malayi larvae and results in transgene inheritance through host and vector passage. Assembly of microinjected transgenes into multi-copy episomal arrays likely results in their transcriptional silencing in some parasitic nematodes. Methods such as transposon-mediated transgenesis that favour low-copy number chromosomal integration may remedy this impediment to establishing stable transgenic lines. In the future, stable transgenesis in parasitic nematodes could enable loss-of-function approaches by insertional mutagenesis, in situ expression of inhibitory double-stranded RNA or boosting RNAi susceptibility through heterologous expression of dsRNA processing and transport proteins.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of gene delivery methods used to date in parasitic nematodes with notes on resulting transgene fates and technical advantages and disadvantages of each

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Transgenesis in Strongyloides stercoralis and S. ratti mediated by the piggyBac transposon. A. Donor plasmid containing the coding sequence of gfp linked to the Ss-era-1 3′ UTR and expressed under the promoter for the S. stercoralis cellular actin Ss-act-2. Coding sequences are flanked by the gypsy retroviral insulator sequences from Drosophila and by the piggyBac inverted tandem repeats (ITR). B. Construct for in vitro transcription of mRNA encoding the piggyBac transposase. C. DIC (left) and fluorescence images (right) of an F2 transgenic S. stercoralis L3i expressing GFP. These and similar S. ratti larvae represent the first transgene-expressing individuals of the F2 generation observed to date for these parasites.

Figure 2

Table 2. Preliminary findings on heritable transposon-mediated transformation and the first sustained transgene expression in the F2 generations of Strongyloides stercoralis and S. ratti

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Cell ablation by expression of reconstituted caspases: a potential application of transgenesis in Strongyloides sp. A. Schematics of the C. elegans CED-3 and caspase-3 procaspases showing prodomains (pink), large subunits (blue) and small subunits (orange). B. Expression constructs encoding the large and small subunits of a caspase fused to one of two antiparallel leucine zipper domains (CZ, green; NZ, yellow) and an intervening linker sequence (gray). These would be expressed under separate promoters with multi-cell specificities that overlapped in a single cell or cell type. C. In the single cells where the subunit constructs were co-expressed, the complementary leucine-zippers would bind, bringing the large and small subunits into proximity, reconstituting the active caspase and destroying the cell. D – F depict expression of neuron-specific reporter constructs in apparently overlapping subsets of amphidial neurons in transgenic S. stercoralis. D. DIC (left) and fluorescence images (right) of an F1 transgenic first-stage larva expressing GFP under the promoter of the Gα protein-encoding gene Ss-gpa-2. Note that a single amphidial neuron, which we hypothesize is ASK, expresses the reporter. The cell body of this neuron, labeled ‘Amph’, and its dendritic process track along the lower margin of the worm, posterior to the nerve ring (NR) in this image. E. DIC (left) and fluorescence images (right) of an F1 transgenic first-stage larva expressing GFP under the promoter of the Gα protein-encoding gene Ss-gpa-3 (Amph – amphidial cell bodies; NR – nerve ring). F. High-magnification fluorescence image of amphidial cell bodies (arrow heads) expressing GFP under the Ss-gpa-3 promoter. Note that up to eight amphidial neurons express the construct and that based on comparison to C. elegans we hypothesize that these include ASK. Promoters with these cell specificities would theoretically allow ablation of ASK-class neurons by transgene-based expression of reconstituted caspases. Panels A–C are redrawn from Chelur, D. S. and Chalfie, M. (2007). Targeted cell killing by reconstituted caspases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 2283–2288, Copyright (2007) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., with permission.

Figure 4

Table 3. Specificity of Ce-gpa-2 and Ce-gpa-3 promoter activation in ampidial neurons. Note that expression overlaps only in ASK class neurons (gray shading), providing a potential unicellular target of genetic cell ablation by expression of reconstituted caspases