Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:03:34.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paeoniflorin attenuates schistosomiasis japonica-associated liver fibrosis through inhibiting alternative activation of macrophages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2011

DEYONG CHU
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Key Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China Anhui Key Laboratory of Zoonose, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
MINGZHAN DU
Affiliation:
Department of Pathological Anatomy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
XIANGYANG HU
Affiliation:
Department of Pathological Anatomy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
QIANG WU
Affiliation:
Department of Pathological Anatomy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
JILONG SHEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Key Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China Anhui Key Laboratory of Zoonose, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Microbiology and Parasitology; Anhui Key Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, AMU; Anhui Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, AMU, No. 81, Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, China. Tel/Fax: +86 551 5113863. E-mail: jlshen@ahmu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Interleukin (IL)-13 and alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) play an important role in liver granuloma and fibrosis of schistosomiasis. Paeoniflorin (PAE, C23H28O11) has been reported to have an anti-hepatic fibrosis effect in schistosomiasis; however, the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we measured serum hyaluronic acid (HA) concentrations, liver granuloma diameter and volume density, fibrosis degree and expressions of IL-13, arginase-1 (ARG-1), nitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS-2), and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (p-STAT6) in mice liver of schistosomiasis. Then we detected expressions of specific biomarkers of AAMs and activity of Arg-1 in Kupffer cells (KCs) from infected and PAE-treated mice, or in KCs from uninfected mice, but exposed to rIL-13 in vitro. Finally, we observed expression of IL-13 signalling molecules in KCs and secretion of IL-13 from lymphocytes of infected and PAE-treated mice. Our results showed that during schistosomiasis, IL-13 expression and secretion increased with liver macrophages activated alternatively. PAE not only directly inhibited alternative activation of macrophages via reducing the phosphorylations of janus-activated kinase 2 (JAK2) and/or STAT6, leading to reduction of AAMs-related markers and Arg-1 activity, but also indirectly suppressed alternative activation of macrophages through decreasing secretion of IL-13. PAE might be a promising prophylactic agent for hepatic granuloma and fibrosis of schistosomiasis japonica.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. Effect of PAE on serum HA, worm burden, egg load, fibrosis, Arg-1, NOS-2, IL-13 and p-STAT6

(HA, hyaluronic acid; Hyp, hydroxyproline; Arg-1, arginase-1; NOS-2, nitric oxide synthase-2; MOD, mean optical density; p-STAT6, phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 6. Mean±S.D., n=12.)
Figure 1

Fig. 1. Effect of PAE on liver histopathogy of schistosomiasis japonica mice. Liver tissue microarray sections from model group and PAE group mice were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (A1, A2, the arrow identifies the granuloma), Masson's trichrome (B1, B2, the arrow identifies the deposition of collagen), anti-ARG-1 Ab (C1, C2, the arrow shows the positive staining), anti-IL-13 Ab (D1, D2, the arrow shows the positive staining) and anti-p-STAT6 Ab (E1, E2, the arrow shows the positive staining).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Effect of PAE on diameter and volume density of hepatic granuloma in mice. (A) Mean hepatic granuloma diameter (in mm); (B) mean hepatic granuloma volume density. 1, Control group; 2, model group; 3, PAE group. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the control group; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the model group. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Effect of PAE on expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR and YM1 at gene and protein level in KCs from mice. (A) Gene expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR and YM1 was analysed by semiquantitative RT-PCR; (B) protein expression of ARG-1, NOS-2 was analysed by Western blotting; (C) gene expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR and YM1 was measured by real-time PCR, and the result expressed as the ratio of macrophage marker mRNA to β-actin mRNA has been shown by a histogram. 1, KCs from the control group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 2, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 3, KCs from the PAE group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 4, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with PAE for 24 h; 5, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with ABH for 24 h. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice; ☆, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice; △, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Effects of PAE on ARG-1 activity and nitrite production in KCs from mice. 1, KCs from the control group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 2, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 3, KCs from the PAE group mice, then stimulated with medium for 24 h; 4, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with PAE for 24 h; 5, KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with ABH for 24 h. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice; ☆, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice; ▼, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice, then stimulated with PAE. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Effect of PAE on production of cytokines from SEA-stimulated lymph node cells isolated from mesenteric lymph nodes of mice. 1, Control group; 2, model group; 3, PAE group. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the control group; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the model group; △, P>0·05, as compared with the model group. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Effects of PAE on expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR, YM1 and activity of ARG-1 in KCs exposed to rIL-13. (A) Gene expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR and YM1 was analysed by semiquantitative RT-PCR; (B) gene expression of ARG-1, NOS-2, MMR and YM1 was measured by real-time PCR, and the result expressed as the ratio of macrophage marker mRNA to β-actin mRNA has been shown by a histogram; (C) activity of ARG-1 in KCs. 1, KCs from the control group mice, then stimulated with medium for 48 h; 2, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h; 3, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with PAE for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h; 4, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with AG490 for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, then stimulated with medium; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium, then exposed to rIL-13; ☆, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, then stimulated with medium; △, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium, then exposed to rIL-13. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Effect of PAE on protein expression of JAK2, p-JAK2, STAT6 and p-STAT6 in KCs from mice. (A) The levels of JAK2, p-JAK2, STAT6 and p-STAT6 proteins were determined by Western blotting; (B) The ratio of signal density of JAK2, p-JAK2, STAT6 and p-STAT6 proteins to that of β-actin protein. 1, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium for 48 h; 2, KCs from the model group mice, stimulated with medium for 48 h; 3, KCs from the PAE group mice, stimulated with medium for 48 h; 4, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h; 5, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with PAE for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h; 6, KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with AG490 for 24 h, then exposed to rIL-13 for another 24 h. ★, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium; ▲, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice, stimulated with medium; ▪, P<0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium, then exposed to rIL-13; ☆, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium; △, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the model group mice, stimulated with medium; □, P>0·05, as compared with the KCs from the control group mice, stimulated with medium, then exposed to rIL-13. Each bar represents the mean and standard deviation.