Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:15:53.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular and morphometric identification of pistachio psyllids with niche modeling of Agonoscena pistaciae (Hemiptera: Aphalaridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Mohammadreza Lashkari*
Affiliation:
Department of Biodiversity, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
Daniel Burckhardt
Affiliation:
Naturhistorisches Museum, Augustinergasse 2, 4001Basel, Switzerland
Roghayeh Shamsi Gushki
Affiliation:
Department of Biodiversity, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Mohammadreza Lashkari, Email: m.lashkari@kgut.ac.ir; mr.lashkari@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species of Agonoscena (Hemiptera: Aphalaridae) are key pests of pistachio in all of the most important pistachio producing countries in the Old World. The efficiency and accuracy of DNA barcoding for the identification of Agonoscena species were tested using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (mtCO1) and cytochrome b (cytb) gene sequences. Moreover, morphometric sexual dimorphism was studied. Finally, the potential geographical distribution of Agonoscena pistaciae, the most important pistachio pest, was calculated using the MaxEnt model. Similar relationships of clustering were found in the morphometric analysis and the molecular analyses with mtCO1 and cytb genes, with A. bimaculata and A. pistaciae being closely related, and A. pegani constituting their sister group. Although the results showed that the cytb gene is a better marker for barcoding in this group, the mtCO1 gene clearly separates the three psyllid species making mtCO1 suitable for diagnostic purposes. A geometric morphometric analysis showed that the distance between landmark number 7 (bifurcation of vein M) to the fore margin of the forewing, and the distance between landmarks number 6 (apex of vein Cu1b) and 11 (wing base), are the most important geometric characters for diagnosing the studied species. Moreover, the forewing shape of males vs females is similar in A. pistaciae and A. bimaculata but differs significantly in A. pegani. In the ecological niche modeling of the distribution of A. pistaciae, the most important contribution was made by the variable ‘minimum temperature of coldest period’. The most suitable areas for A. pistaciae are restricted to Eastern, Southern and some parts of Central Iran.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Figure 1. Collection sites of three Agonoscena species: A. pistaciae, A. pegani, and A. bimaculata. See table 1 for details.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of specimens used for molecular and morphometric analyses (No.), geographic information of samples (locality name, geographical coordinates and altitude in m above sea level) and host name for three Agonoscena species, A. pistaciae, A. pegani, and A. bimaculata

Figure 2

Table 2. The primers used in PCR amplifications of mtCO1 and cytb genes

Figure 3

Figure 2. Position of landmarks (circles) on the right forewing of A. pistaciae. Positions of landmarks follow Lashkari et al. (2013).

Figure 4

Table 3. Collection sites of A. pistaciae in Iran with geographic coordinates and data source (reference) used in ecological niche modeling.

Figure 5

Table 4. Environmental variables used in ecological niche modeling of A. pistaciae in Iran

Figure 6

Figure 3. Bayesian gene tree of Agonoscena species based on mtCO1 and cytb genes sequences. Bayesian posterior probabilities (in %) are shown next to the node points. The scale bar represents the number of substitution per sites.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Superimposed landmarks on forewing of the three Agonoscena species: A. bimaculata, A. pegani, and A. pistaciae.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Plots of the partial warp score matrix for the three Agonoscena species: A. bimaculata, A. pegani, and A. pistaciae.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Superimposed forewings of the three Agonoscena species: A. pegani, A. bimaculata, and A. pistaciae.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Phenogram plotted by the UPGMA method based on the generalized distance matrix in the three Agonoscena species: A. pegani, A. bimaculata, and A. pistaciae.

Figure 11

Table 5. The forewing shape and size with allometric growth test between sexes and species

Figure 12

Figure 8. Centroid size comparison of three Agonoscena species: A. pegani, A. bimaculata, and A. pistaciae.

Figure 13

Figure 9. Superimposed forewings of male and female of A. pegani.

Figure 14

Figure 10. Predicted potential distribution of A. pistaciae for the present. Probabilities 1 = high, 0 = low.

Figure 15

Figure 11. Predicted potential distribution of A. pistaciae for the future. Probabilities 1 = high, 0 = low.