Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:32:25.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Annual flooding, survival and recruitment in a rodent population from the Niger River plain in Mali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Laurent Crespin*
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (UMR 022), IRD, Campus international Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France
Yves Papillon
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (UMR 022), IRD, Campus international Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France
Doukary Abdoulaye
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (UMR 022), IRD, Campus international Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France
Laurent Granjon
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (UMR 022), IRD, Campus international Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France
Bruno Sicard
Affiliation:
Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (UMR 022), IRD, Campus international Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France
*
1Corresponding author. Email: laurent.crespin@ua.ac.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multimammate rats of the genus Mastomys are among the most widespread pest species in Africa. Previous studies of Mastomys population dynamics have generally reported variation in abundance but few have investigated the demographic parameters underlying this variation, and in particular recruitment. Capture-mark-recapture data were collected for Mastomys erythroleucus several times a year from 2000 to 2004 at a site annually flooded by the Niger River in Mali. Closed-population models were used to estimate population abundance. Both seniority (a parameter inversely linked to recruitment) and survival probabilities were estimated by capture-mark-recapture models. The impacts of water level, population abundance and cumulative rainfall were assessed for each demographic parameter. Survival probabilities (local survival) were negatively correlated with water level, suggesting that rodents emigrated out of the study zone during flooding. As for seniority probabilities, 86% of temporal variation was explained by a model with season, abundance, water level and the interaction between abundance and water level. This suggests that density-dependence in recruitment was mediated by intraspecific competition for food or refuge from floodwaters, or by predation. The flood of the Niger River greatly impacts Mastomys erythroleucus population dynamics, affecting both survival and seniority probabilities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
Figure 0

Figure 1. Trapping site. The study site was situated 40 km south-west of Bamako in the alluvial plain of the River Niger (Mali 8°12 W 12°32 N, see (a). The trapping design was formed of several sets of trapping lines, roughly perpendicular to the shore and connected by an extra trapping line set up on the dyke (see (b) and text for further details). There was a gentle slope from the dyke to the river (see (c)).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Variation of monthly water level (1999–2005) at Koulikoro (a) and rainfall at Bamako (2000–2003) (b). Numbers and bars on top of each bar display respectively the mean and the upper confidence limit at 95%.

Figure 2

Table 1. Trapping schedule and estimates of abundance at each primary trapping session. PTS = primary trapping session; # : no recapture at this PTS; p = probability of capture estimated from closed population models; N = population size estimated from closed population models (Mh with the jack-knife estimator) and the associated standard error; MNKA = Minimum Number Known Alive. Column labelled ‘Weight’ gives the average weight and associated standard error in grams of all individuals caught at the PTS. Column labelled ‘≤ 20 g’ gives the number of individuals whose weight was inferior or equal to 20 g at each PTS (− = means no capture of this kind of individual). The trapping session the closest to the maximum of the flooding is indicated in bold for each year.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Estimate of abundance (a), survival (b) and seniority probabilities (c) with their 95% confidence limits (ticks). Abundance was estimated from model Mh. Survival and seniority probability estimates are from the best models and standardized to 7 d. A few points are on the boundary of the parameter space (i.e. equal to 0 and 1) and consequently no confidence intervals are displayed since standard likelihood theory cannot provide sensible estimates of standard errors for parameter estimates lying on a boundary. Vertical dashed bars represent for each year the maximum intensity of the flooding events measured at Koulikoro, a site 70 km downstream from our study site.

Figure 4

Table 2. Models in survival probabilities ranked by AICc. Only the first five models run are displayed; however other models run were essentially not supported by the data (ΔAICc ≥ 10, Burnham & Anderson 1998). Best model is shown in bold. AICc = Akaike's Information Criterion; ΔAICc = difference in AICc with the score of best model; AICc Weight = Akaike's weight; DEV = deviance; np = number of identifiable parameters; m = trap-happiness effect; t = full-time variation; s = seasonal variation; y = annual variation.

Figure 5

Table 3. Models in seniority probabilities ranked by AICc. Only the first five models run are displayed; however other models run were essentially not supported by the data (ΔAICc ≥ 10, see Burnham & Anderson 1998). Best model is shown in bold. AICc = Akaike's Information Criterion; ΔAICc = difference in AICc with the score of best model; AICc Weight = Akaike's weight; DEV = deviance; np = number of identifiable parameters; m = trap-happiness effect; t = full-time variation; s = seasonal variation; y = annual variation.

Figure 6

Appendix 1. Set of models run for the seniority (γ) and the survival (φ) analysis. This appendix displays only the models not presented in Tables 2 and 3. Models are ranked by the Akaike Information Criterion. For both the seniority and the survival analysis, all models had an Akaike's weight equalling zero. Detection probabilities for each analysis were respectively denoted as r and p. AICc = Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes; np = number of identifiable parameters; DEV = deviance; m = trap-happiness effect; t = full-time variation; s = seasonal variation; y = annual variation;. = no variation (intercept-only model).