Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T17:31:32.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular detection and characterisation of sapoviruses and noroviruses in outpatient children with diarrhoea in Northwest Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

A. GelawOpen the ORCID record for A. Gelaw[Opens in a new window],
C. PietschOpen the ORCID record for C. Pietsch[Opens in a new window],
P. Mann and
U.G. Liebert
A. Gelaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, EthiopiaInstitute of Virology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
C. Pietsch
Affiliation:
Institute of Virology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
P. Mann
Affiliation:
Institute of Virology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
U.G. Liebert
Affiliation:
Institute of Virology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Aschalew Gelaw, E-mail: aschalew3@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Childhood morbidity and mortality of diarrhoeal diseases are high, particularly in low-income countries and noroviruses and sapoviruses are among the most frequent causes worldwide. Their epidemiology and diversity remain not well studied in many African countries. To assess the positivity rate and the diversity of sapoviruses and noroviruses in Northwest Ethiopia, during November 2015 and April 2016, a total of 450 faecal samples were collected from outpatient children aged <5 years who presented with diarrhoea. Samples were screened for noroviruses and sapoviruses by real-time RT-PCR. Partial VP1 genes were sequenced, genotyped and phylogenetically analysed. Norovirus and sapovirus stool positivity rate was 13.3% and 10.0%, respectively. Noroviruses included GII.4 (35%), GII.6 (20%), GII.17 (13.3%), GII.10 (10%), GII.2 (6.7%), GII.16 (5%), GII.7 (3.3%), GII.9, GII.13, GII.20 and GI.3 (1.7% each) strains. For sapoviruses, GI.1, GII.1 (20.0% each), GII.6 (13.3%), GI.2 (8.9%), GII.2 (11.1%), GV.1 (8.9%), GIV.1 (6.7%), GI.3 and GII.4 (2.2% each) genotypes were detected. This study demonstrates a high genetic diversity of noroviruses and sapoviruses in Northwest Ethiopia. The positivity rate in stool samples from young children with diarrhoea was high for both caliciviruses. Continued monitoring is recommended to identify trends in genetic diversity and seasonal variations.

Keywords

Childhood diarrhoeagenotypinglow-income countrymolecular epidemiologynorthwest Ethiopia

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 147 , 2019, e218
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Introduction

Gastroenteritis causes the second greatest burden of all infectious diseases worldwide. The brunt of severe outcomes of diarrhoeal disease falls in low-income countries [Reference Lozano1]. Globally, almost one-fifth of all cases of acute gastroenteritis are norovirus-induced and an estimated 212 000 annual deaths are norovirus-related [Reference Pires2]. Similarly to noroviruses, sapoviruses are detected worldwide and are ranked second to fourth as the major viral pathogens among patients with sporadic gastroenteritis [Reference Oka3].

Sapoviruses and noroviruses belong to the family of Caliciviridae, naked viruses with positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome. The genome of sapoviruses is organised into two open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2). The large ORF1 encodes the non-structural proteins and the major virus capsid protein of the virus (VP1). The small ORF2 encodes the minor capsid protein (VP2) [Reference Oka3]. The genome of noroviruses is organised into three ORFs (ORF1–ORF3). The large ORF1 encodes the non-structural proteins. The smaller ORF2 and ORF3 encode the VP1 and the VP2, respectively [Reference Robilotti, Deresinski and Pinsky4].

Both caliciviruses affect humans and animals and show extensive genetic diversity. Based on the VP1 gene, sapoviruses and noroviruses are phylogenetically classified into 15 (GI–GXV) and nine (GI–GIX) genogroups, respectively. Each of which can be subdivided into genotypes [Reference Oka3, Reference Oka5, Reference Vinje6]. Human pathogenic sapovirus strains are assigned to four genogroups and belong to at least 18 genotypes (GI.1–GI.7, GII.1–GII.8, GIV.1, GV.1 and GV.2) [Reference Oka5]. Norovirus genogroup GI, GII, GIV, GVIII and GIX (formerly GII.15) infect humans. Within the most frequent human pathogenic norovirus genogroups, GII and GI, at least 22 and 9 genotypes have been detected, respectively [Reference Vinje6–Reference Pietsch8].

Several norovirus vaccines are currently in development [Reference Lucero, Vidal and O'Ryan9]. As acquired norovirus immunity is mainly genotype-specific [Reference Malm10], the success of vaccine formulations will substantially depend on the accurate selection of included norovirus genotypes. Thus, solid knowledge of norovirus diversity in the different areas of the world is indispensable. Infants and young children in low- and middle-income countries should be among the primary targets for anti-norovirus vaccination [Reference Lopman11]. However, information regarding the impact and epidemiology of noroviruses in African countries remains limited [Reference Mans12, Reference Magwalivha13]. As the clinical symptoms of norovirus and sapovirus gastroenteritis are indistinguishable [Reference Oka3], estimates of the impact of sapovirus infections are important to precisely define the role of norovirus in severe paediatric gastroenteritis.

To further our knowledge on the epidemiology of both caliciviruses in Sub-Saharan Africa, the present study aimed to exploit the stool positivity rate and genetic diversity of sapoviruses and noroviruses among outpatient infants and young children with diarrhoea in Northwest Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

During rotavirus surveillance, a total of 450 faecal specimens were collected from outpatient children of <5 years of age with diarrhoea at two sampling sites, Gondar and Bahir Dar, in Northwest Ethiopia from November 2015 to April 2016 (Fig. 1) [Reference Gelaw, Pietsch and Liebert14].

Fig. 1.

Map of sampling sites. Stools were sampled in the cities Gondar and Bahir Dar, which are both situated in the Amhara National Regional State (grey) in Northwest Ethiopia. Previous data on sapoviruses and/or noroviruses are available from the nearby rural Goncha Siso Enese region, the capital Addis Ababa and the city of Awassa.

Viral detection and molecular characterisation

Nucleic acids were extracted from 10% stool suspensions in phosphate buffered saline (MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit, Roche, Germany) and screened for the presence of GI, GII, GIV and GV sapovirus and GI and GII norovirus RNA by real-time RT-PCR [Reference Pietsch8, Reference Hoehne and Schreier15–Reference Pietsch and Liebert18].

For sapovirus and norovirus capsid genotyping, partial VP1 genes were amplified (One-Step RT-PCR Kit, Hilden, Germany), purified (Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System, Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and sequenced (BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit and ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer, PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using different primer sets. A detailed overview of the primers and probes used in this study can be found in the online Supplementary Table S1. Sapovirus capsid genotypes were identified by phylogenetic analysis of 675–712 nucleotides of the N-terminal VP1 gene region following the recommended classification and nomenclature [Reference Oka19]. Norovirus capsid genotypes were identified based on 273–285 nucleotides of VP1 gene region C using Norovirus Typing Tool Version 2.0 [Reference Kroneman20]. Phylogenetic trees for sapoviruses and noroviruses were constructed based on nucleic acid sequence alignments with available reference GenBank accessions using Maximum Likelihood method in MEGA5 software. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. The obtained sequences of the present sapovirus and norovirus strains have been deposited in GenBank database (GenBank accessions MK246651-MK246752).

Statistical analysis

Data were entred and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 16. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. P values of <0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Ethical clearance

The Ethical Review Board of the University of Gondar approved the research protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of the children.

Results

Sapovirus and norovirus RNA stool positivity

Real-time RT-PCR showed sapovirus RNA in 45 (10.0%, 95% CI 7.6–13.1%) and norovirus RNA in 60 (13.3%, 95% CI 10.5–16.8%) stool samples, respectively. In three stool samples, co-presence of both caliciviruses was shown. Mixed infections with wildtype rotavirus A were identified in 13 (27.2%) sapovirus and 11 (18.3%) norovirus positive stool samples. Whereas sapovirus RNA was more frequently detected in samples from Gondar (15.5%) than from Bahir Dar (5.6%) (P = 0.001), the norovirus stool positivity rate was not significantly different between the two sampling sites. Regarding the age of children, norovirus stool positivity rate was higher in children aged <2 years (17.4%, P = 0.007) than in children within the third to the fifth year of age (8.9%). In contrast, sapovirus stool positivity rate did not vary across age. There was neither association between sapovirus or norovirus RNA stool positivity and children's sex, nor residence, nor co-infection with wildtype rotaviruses (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sapovirus and norovirus positivity of stool samples

Genotypic distribution and phylogenetic analysis of sapoviruses

Amplification of VP1 and subsequent genotyping was successful in 42 (93.3%) sapovirus positive stool samples. Overall, sapovirus RNA was detected throughout the 6 months of the sampling period (Fig. 2A). Sapovirus strains of all four known human pathogenic genogroups, GI, GII, GIV and GV, were present in Bahir Dar. In contrast, only GI and GII sapoviruses were detected in Gondar. At genotype level, diversity was high at both sampling sites and included nine different genotypes (Table 2). In GI.1, GII.1 and GII.2 genotypes, an additional intra-genotypic diversity was shown by phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3A and B). In contrast, only a single strain or very closely related strains were detected for GI.2, GI.3, GII.4, GII.6, GIV.1 and GV.1 sapoviruses (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Monthly positivity rate of stool samples (PR) and distribution of sapovirus (A) and norovirus (B) genotypes in Gondar and Bahir Dar.

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic analysis of sapoviruses (A, B and C) and noroviruses (D) based on Maximum Likelihood estimations of partial VP1 gene nucleic acid sequences. Numbers at each node represents bootstrap values obtained with 1000 replicates (>80 are shown). Strains from the present study are labelled with a black circle (Gondar) and black diamond (Bahir Dar). Grey triangles indicate previously reported strains from Ethiopia.

Table 2.

Sapovirus and norovirus genotypes per sampling site

The intra-genotypic analysis of the different GII.2 strains revealed phylogenetic clustering of one of the present Ethiopian GII.2 strains, Hu/ET/2016/GII.2/Gondar074, with strain Hu/MX/1990/GII.2/MexicoCity-Mex340 and 93.2% nucleic acid identity between the two strains (Fig. 3B). The cluster of the present Ethiopian and the Mexican strain was clearly separated from all other available GII.2 sequences with sufficient lengths and showed low nucleic acid identity with all of them (82.6–84.2%). In comparison to shorter GII.2 sequences, the highest nucleotide identity reached a similar level (85.1%) and was shown for sapovirus strain Hu/RU/2002/GII.2/Moscow-2240-RF.

Only four sufficiently long VP1 sequences of African sapovirus strains with the same genotypes as detected in the present study were available. Three of the strains clustered very closely with present Ethiopian strains. First, strain Chimp/CD/2011/GI.1/Tchimpounga from a chimp living in close contact to humans in Republic of Congo clustered with two present GI.1 sequences from Gondar. Second, strain Hu/KE/2006/GI.3/Siaya1927 from Kenya was phylogenetically related to the present GI.3 strain from Bahir Dar (Fig. 3A). Third, strain Hu/KE/2008/GII.6/Siaya0494 from Kenya was related to all present GII.6 strains. The fourth strain from the African region, Hu/KE/2006/GII.2/Siaya2158 from Kenya, fell into the same cluster as most GII.2 strains of the present study, but was not very closely related (Fig. 3B). The two available VP1 sequence fragments of GII.1 sapovirus strains from Ethiopia, Hu/ET/2016/GII.1/GonchaSisoEnese-P5 and -P19, were too short to be included into phylogenetic analyses and were most similar (97.5% and 98.2%) to the present strain Hu/ET/2016/GII.1/BahirDar461.

Genotypic distribution and phylogenetic analysis of noroviruses

Genotyping was successful in all norovirus positive stool samples. Within noroviruses, GII genogroup strains prevailed (98.3%). In total, eleven distinct norovirus genotypes were identified, including rare GII.9, GII.10 and GII.20 strains. At both sampling sites, norovirus genotypes were diverse. Different noroviruses, but no GII.4 strains, were detected in Bahir Dar. In Gondar, norovirus detections were only detected from January to April 2016 and were predominantly GII.4 genotypes (Fig. 2B, Table 2).

All present GII.4 sequences were identified as GII.4 Sydney 2012 variants by Norovirus Typing Tool and formed a phylogenetic cluster distinct from GII.4 strains detected in 2009 and 2013 in the Ethiopian cities Addis Ababa and Awassa (Fig. 3D). Comparison to a more recent GII.4 norovirus, Hu/ET/GII.4/2016/GonchaSisoEnese-P11, was not possible, as the available sequencing data of the VP1 gene region C was too short. The same applied for GII.9. Similarly to GII.4, the present GII.2 and GII.17 strains showed no relatedness to noroviruses detected in 2009 and 2013 in Ethiopia. Neither did the present GI.3 norovirus strain cluster with GI.3 sequences reported from Awassa in 2009 or Northwest Ethiopia in 2016. However, GII.6 and GII.10 sequences obtained during a recent study in Northwest Ethiopia were closely related to GII.6 and GII.10 strains of the present stool samples (Fig. 3D).

Discussion

The present study underlines the role of norovirus and sapovirus infections in acute gastroenteritis in Eastern Africa and shows calicivirus RNA positivity in about one-quarter of stool samples from Ethiopian infants and young children with diarrhoea. This value is similar to the lately assessed positivity rate of wildtype rotaviruses in the same sample set [Reference Gelaw, Pietsch and Liebert14]. Due to the recent introduction of anti-rotavirus vaccines in Ethiopia, the relative role of norovirus and sapovirus-related diarrhoea cases is likely to increase in the future [Reference Pitkanen, Vesikari and Hemming-Harlo21, Reference Santos22]. The high number of calicivirus and rotavirus co-infections indicates frequent exposure to viral enteric pathogens, which may be shed for weeks after acute infection [Reference Atmar23–Reference Mukhopadhya25].

The present study provides the first comprehensive human sapovirus genotyping data from Ethiopia. Consistent with previous reports from Sub-Saharan Africa [Reference Shioda26–Reference Page28], sapovirus RNA was detected in one out of ten present stool samples. Interestingly, sapovirus stool positivity rate significantly differed between Gondar and Bahir Dar. The detected sapovirus strains belonged to a variety of genotypes at both sampling sites and showed a fluctuating monthly distribution. These results point to local co-circulation of different sapovirus strains and frequent sporadic infections in the area. Notably, the observed genetic diversity may well remain underestimated as (i) three detected sapoviruses could not be typed and (ii) the used real-time RT-PCR approach has very recently been shown to fail to detect some sapovirus genotypes [Reference Oka29].

In line with the present results, diversity of sapoviruses in Sub-Saharan Africa was shown to be high in previous studies [Reference Matussek30, Reference Murray31]. But sapovirus sequencing data from the African region remains limited. Accordingly, previously reported human sapovirus sequences from Ethiopia are restricted to one partial polymerase gene [Reference Sisay32] and GII.1 and GII.2 sapovirus genome fragments obtained from three stool sample pools [Reference Altan33]. As many published VP1 sequences from the African region are short or scattered within the VP1 gene, the present phylogenetic analysis was mainly based on VP1 sequencing data from other continents and additionally included strains from Kenya and Republic of Congo. Notably, wherever data of the present genotypes from the African region was available, at least one of the present sapoviruses from Ethiopia clustered very closely or nearby. Whereas most of the present sapovirus variants were similar to recent strains, sapovirus Hu/ET/2016/GII.2/Gondar074 was phylogentically distant and related to an orphan GII.2 strain detected in Mexico in 1990 [Reference Farkas34]. Apparently, this GII.2 sapovirus variant is rare, or may alternatively be rarely identified by commonly used detection and/or genotyping approaches.

Noroviruses were detected at a similar frequency as sapoviruses in the present stool samples. Their stool positivity rate was highest in infants and children aged <2 years, which is consistent to recently reviewed data from other low-income countries [Reference Mans12, Reference Shioda35, Reference O'Ryan, Riera-Montes and Lopman36]. In agreement with previous reports from Ethiopia [Reference Sisay32, Reference Yassin37] and reviewed data from Sub-Saharan Africa [Reference Munjita38], genotype diversity was high and GII noroviruses prevailed. High norovirus diversity and recurrent norovirus infections early in life have also been shown in a recent seroepidemiological study from an Eastern African country Uganda, which identified almost 95% positivity and responses to multiple human norovirus genotypes by age 2 years [Reference Thorne39].

For Ethiopia, nucleic acid sequences of six genogroup GI (GI.1, GI.3, GI.4, GI.5, GI.6 and GI.7) and nine genogroup GII genotypes (GII.2, GII.3, GII.4, GII.6, GII.9, GII.10, GII.12, GII.14 and GII.17) have been reported in human stool samples [Reference Sisay32, Reference Altan33, Reference Yassin37]. The present study confirmed seven of those genotypes (GI.3, GII.2, GII.4, GII.6, GII.9, GII.10 and GII.17) and furthermore adds GII.7, GII.13, GII.16 and GII.20 noroviruses. Notably, GII.3 strains considered epidemiologically important in Ethiopia previously [Reference Yassin37], were not detected in the present stool samples. Strain diversity might be even higher, as polymerase genotypes and therefore norovirus recombinant strains were not assessed in the present study. Intragenotypic phylogenetic relatedness of the present strains with noroviruses published earlier from the country was low, except for GII.6 and GII.10 genotypes reported from Goncha Siso Enese region in 2016 [Reference Altan33], i.e. reported during the same time at a nearby sampling site.

These results point to a dynamic and diverse norovirus population within Ethiopia, which possibly reflects an ongoing global circulation of human noroviruses resulting in a frequent import of pandemic strains. Such a rapid global spread was recently described for a novel GII.17 strain [Reference de Graaf40], which was also detected in stools from both present sampling sites. It is important to be aware, that studies with a limited number of sampling sites, short sampling periods and small sample sets may only capture fragmentary snapshots of the true genetic diversity in a country. Local circulation patterns may not reflect the nation-wide circulation of the strains. The possible bias by selection of sampling sites can be well illustrated by the results from the present two proximate sampling sites Gondar and Bahir Dar. Whereas noroviruses in stool samples from Gondar were predominated by the globally most prevalent genotype GII.4, this genotype was not detected at all in samples from Bahir Dar.

Similarly to the geographical location, the sampling period influences the results. Norovirus seasonality is less obvious in the African regions as in the Northern hemisphere and not well understood in East Africa [Reference Mans12]. The present study was restricted to 6 months sampling during the dry and warm season. Norovirus positivity rate and genotypes changed during that period and may well be different again during the cooler wet season. Due to inconsistent sampling sites, sampling periods and sample numbers, comparative analysis of the data of different studies from one country may fail to estimate the true genetic diversity and dynamics of norovirus epidemiology in time. Standardised continuous monitoring of circulating norovirus strains in an increased number of samples at multiple sampling sites would be necessary to reduce the bias.

In conclusion, sapovirus and norovirus stool positivity in young children with diarrhoeal disease is high in Northwest Ethiopia. Genetically diverse caliciviruses are co-circulating and may vary in time and between proximate sites. Continuous monitoring will be important to provide profound data on the dynamic calicivirus epidemiology and diversity in Ethiopia.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819001031.

Author ORCIDs

A. Gelaw, 0000-0001-9239-1616; C. Pietsch, 0000-0001-6029-3368

Acknowledgements

Our special thanks go to the study participants and the data collectors involved in this study, especially for Mr. Eyuel Kassa and Mr. Derese Hailu. We are also grateful to Sandra Bergs for excellent technical assistance. This research was partially supported by the Association of Sponsors and Friends of Leipzig University (Vereinigung von Förderern und Freunden der Universität Leipzig) and received funding from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author contributions

The manuscript contains data that have not previously been published or submitted elsewhere; it has not been submitted for publication elsewhere. AG and UGL designed the study. CP, AG and PM carried out the laboratory experiments. AG and CP performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. UGL revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

*

AG and CP contributed equally

References

1.Lozano, R et al. (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380, 2095–2128.Google Scholar
2.Pires, SM et al. (2015) Aetiology-specific estimates of the global and regional incidence and mortality of diarrhoeal diseases commonly transmitted through food. PLoS ONE 10, e0142927.Google Scholar
3.Oka, T et al. (2015) Comprehensive review of human sapoviruses. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 28, 32–53.Google Scholar
4.Robilotti, E, Deresinski, S and Pinsky, BA (2015) Norovirus. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 28, 134–164.Google Scholar
5.Oka, T et al. (2016) Genetic characterization and classification of human and animal sapoviruses. PLoS ONE 11, e0156373.Google Scholar
6.Vinje, J (2015) Advances in laboratory methods for detection and typing of norovirus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 53, 373–381.Google Scholar
7.de Graaf, M, van Beek, J and Koopmans, MP (2016) Human norovirus transmission and evolution in a changing world. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14, 421–433.Google Scholar
8.Pietsch, C et al. (2018) Within-host evolution of virus variants during chronic infection with novel GII.P26-GII.26 norovirus. Journal of Clinical Virology 108, 96–102.Google Scholar
9.Lucero, Y, Vidal, R and O'Ryan, GM (2018) Norovirus vaccines under development. Vaccine 36, 5435–5441.Google Scholar
10.Malm, M et al. (2014) High serum levels of norovirus genotype-specific blocking antibodies correlate with protection from infection in children. Journal of Infectious Diseases 210, 1755–1762.Google Scholar
11.Lopman, BA et al. (2016) The vast and varied global burden of norovirus: prospects for prevention and control. PLoS Medicine 13, e1001999.Google Scholar
12.Mans, J et al. (2016) Norovirus epidemiology in Africa: a review. PLoS ONE 11, e0146280.Google Scholar
13.Magwalivha, M et al. (2017) Prevalence of human sapovirus in low and middle income countries. Advances in Virology 2018, 5986549.Google Scholar
14.Gelaw, A, Pietsch, C and Liebert, UG (2018) Molecular epidemiology of rotaviruses in Northwest Ethiopia after national vaccine introduction. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 65, 300–307.Google Scholar
15.Hoehne, M and Schreier, E (2006) Detection of Norovirus genogroup I and II by multiplex real-time RT- PCR using a 3′-minor groove binder-DNA probe. BMC Infectious Diseases 6, 69.Google Scholar
16.Kageyama, T et al. (2003) Broadly reactive and highly sensitive assay for Norwalk-like viruses based on real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 1548–1557.Google Scholar
17.Oka, T et al. (2006) Identification of the cleavage sites of sapovirus open reading frame 1 polyprotein. Journal of General Virology 87, 3329–3338.Google Scholar
18.Pietsch, C and Liebert, UG (2019) Intrahost viral evolution during chronic sapovirus infections. Journal of Clinical Virology 113, 1–7.Google Scholar
19.Oka, T et al. (2012) Human sapovirus classification based on complete capsid nucleotide sequences. Archives of Virology 157, 349–352.Google Scholar
20.Kroneman, A et al. (2011) An automated genotyping tool for enteroviruses and noroviruses. Journal of Clinical Virology 51, 121–125.Google Scholar
21.Pitkanen, O, Vesikari, T and Hemming-Harlo, M (2018) The role of the sapovirus infection increased in gastroenteritis after national immunisation was introduced. Acta Paediatrica 1 – 7.Google Scholar
22.Santos, VS et al. (2017) Acute norovirus gastroenteritis in children in a highly rotavirus-vaccinated population in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Clinical Virology 88, 33–38.Google Scholar
23.Atmar, RL et al. (2008) Norwalk virus shedding after experimental human infection. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14, 1553–1557.Google Scholar
24.Iwakiri, A et al. (2009) Quantitative analysis of fecal sapovirus shedding: identification of nucleotide substitutions in the capsid protein during prolonged excretion. Archives of Virology 154, 689–693.Google Scholar
25.Mukhopadhya, I et al. (2013) Rotavirus shedding in symptomatic and asymptomatic children using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Journal of Medical Virology 85, 1771–1668.Google Scholar
26.Shioda, K et al. (2016) Population-based incidence rates of diarrheal disease associated with norovirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus in Kenya. PloS one 11, e0145943.Google Scholar
27.Pelkonen, T et al. (2017) Potential diarrheal pathogens common also in healthy children in Angola. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 37, 424–428.Google Scholar
28.Page, N et al. (2016) Sapovirus prevalence in children less than five years of age hospitalised for diarrhoeal disease in South Africa, 2009–2013. Journal of Clinical Virology 78, 82–88.Google Scholar
29.Oka, T et al. (2018) Broadly reactive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of human sapovirus genotypes. Journal of Medical Virology 91, 370–377.Google Scholar
30.Matussek, A et al. (2015) Molecular characterization and genetic susceptibility of sapovirus in children with diarrhea in Burkina Faso. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 32, 396–400.Google Scholar
31.Murray, TY et al. (2016) Diverse sapovirus genotypes identified in children hospitalised with gastroenteritis in selected regions of South Africa. Journal of Clinical Virology 76, 24–29.Google Scholar
32.Sisay, Z et al. (2016) Prevalence and molecular characterization of human noroviruses and sapoviruses in Ethiopia. Archives of Virology 161, 2169–2182.Google Scholar
33.Altan, E et al. (2018) Enteric virome of Ethiopian children participating in a clean water intervention trial. PloS One 13, e0202054.Google Scholar
34.Farkas, T et al. (2004) Genetic diversity among sapoviruses. Archives of Virology 149, 1309–1323.Google Scholar
35.Shioda, K et al. (2015) Global age distribution of pediatric norovirus cases. Vaccine 33, 4065–4068.Google Scholar
36.O'Ryan, M, Riera-Montes, M and Lopman, B (2017) Norovirus in latin america: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 36, 127–134.Google Scholar
37.Yassin, MA et al. (2012) Unusual norovirus and rotavirus genotypes in Ethiopia. Paediatrics and International Child Health 32, 51–55.Google Scholar
38.Munjita, SM (2015) Current status of norovirus infections in children in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Tropical Medicine 2015, 309648.Google Scholar
39.Thorne, L et al. (2018) The first norovirus longitudinal seroepidemiological study from Sub-Saharan Africa reveals high seroprevalence of diverse genotypes associated With host susceptibility factors. Journal of Infectious Diseases 218, 716–725.Google Scholar
40.de Graaf, M et al. (2015) Emergence of a novel GII.17 norovirus-End of the GII.4 era? Eurosurveillance 20, 1–12.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of sampling sites. Stools were sampled in the cities Gondar and Bahir Dar, which are both situated in the Amhara National Regional State (grey) in Northwest Ethiopia. Previous data on sapoviruses and/or noroviruses are available from the nearby rural Goncha Siso Enese region, the capital Addis Ababa and the city of Awassa.

Figure 1

Table 1.Sapovirus and norovirus positivity of stool samples

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Monthly positivity rate of stool samples (PR) and distribution of sapovirus (A) and norovirus (B) genotypes in Gondar and Bahir Dar.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Phylogenetic analysis of sapoviruses (A, B and C) and noroviruses (D) based on Maximum Likelihood estimations of partial VP1 gene nucleic acid sequences. Numbers at each node represents bootstrap values obtained with 1000 replicates (>80 are shown). Strains from the present study are labelled with a black circle (Gondar) and black diamond (Bahir Dar). Grey triangles indicate previously reported strains from Ethiopia.

Figure 4

Table 2.Sapovirus and norovirus genotypes per sampling site

Supplementary material: File

Gelaw et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Gelaw et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.9 KB