Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:00:52.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasite burden and the insect immune response: interpopulation comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

KARI M. KAUNISTO*
Affiliation:
Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, FI-20014University of Turku, Finland
JUKKA SUHONEN
Affiliation:
Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, FI-20014University of Turku, Finland
*
*Corresponding author: Tel: +358 40 7401653. E-mail: kkauni@utu.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The immune response affects host's survival and reproductive success. Insurmountable immune function has not evolved because it is costly and there is a trade-off between other life-history traits. In previous studies several factors such as diet and temperature have been proposed to cause interpopulation differences in immune response. Moreover, the insect immune system may be functionally more protective upon secondary exposure, thus infection history may associate with the immune response. Here we measured how geographical location and parasite burden is related to variation in immune response between populations. We included 13 populations of the Northern Damselfly Coenagrion hastulatum (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in Finland over a latitudinal range of 880 km to this study. We found that water mites associated strongly with the immune response at interpopulation level: the more the mites, the higher the immune response. Also, in an alternative model based on AIC, latitude and individual size associated with the immune response. In turn, endoparasitic gregarines did not affect the immune response. To conclude, a positive interpopulation association between the immune response and the rate of water mite infection may indicate (i) local adaptation to chronic parasite stress, (ii) effective ‘induced’ immune response against parasites, or (iii) a combined effect of both of these.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Locations of the study populations of Coenagrion hastulatum in Finland are indicated with filled dots (n=13).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of water mites (%) in relation to the encapsulation response. A dot represents the mean values of sample populations (n = 13).

Figure 2

Table 1. Result from multiple regression analysis

(The mean immune response of population was used as an independent variable and the prevalence of water mites, prevalence of gregarines, the mean size of individual measured by length of hind wing (mm) and the latitude (km), to the nearest 50 m of the sampling site's centre by using GPS, were used as explanatory variables for Coenagrion hastulatum. The model was performed with stepwise selection. No other variable except water mite prevalence met the significance level of 0·15 for entry into the model.)
Figure 3

Table 2. Individual model results of top models (with a Δ AICc <4) explaining the immune response in Coenagrion hastulatum populations in Finland

(Adjusted r2 gives the percentage of variance explained by the model (from multiple regression analysis), estimated regression coefficient for the variable. t-statistics and P values indicate statistical significance of each variable in the model. The immune response was used as an independent variable and the prevalence of water mites (M), prevalence of gregarines (G), size of individual (S) and the latitude (L), were used as explanatory variables.)