Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:23:09.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental control of swept-wing transition through base-flow modification by plasma actuators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2018

Srikar Yadala*
Affiliation:
AWEP Department, Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands Institut PPRIME, Université de Poitiers (CNRS UPR 3346, ISAE-ENSMA), Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie, BP 30179, 86962 Futuroscope, France
Marc T. Hehner
Affiliation:
AWEP Department, Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands Institut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 21, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany
Jacopo Serpieri
Affiliation:
AWEP Department, Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
Nicolas Benard
Affiliation:
Institut PPRIME, Université de Poitiers (CNRS UPR 3346, ISAE-ENSMA), Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie, BP 30179, 86962 Futuroscope, France
Philipp C. Dörr
Affiliation:
Institut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 21, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany
Markus J. Kloker
Affiliation:
Institut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 21, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany
Marios Kotsonis
Affiliation:
AWEP Department, Section of Aerodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
*
†Email address for correspondence: s.yadalavenkata@tudelft.nl

Abstract

Control of laminar-to-turbulent transition on a swept-wing is achieved by base-flow modification in an experimental framework, up to a chord Reynolds number of 2.5 million. This technique is based on the control strategy used in the numerical simulation by Dörr & Kloker (J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 48, 2015b, 285205). A spanwise uniform body force is introduced using dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators, to either force against or along the local cross-flow component of the boundary layer. The effect of forcing on the stability of the boundary layer is analysed using a simplified model proposed by Serpieri et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 833, 2017, pp. 164–205). A minimal thickness plasma actuator is fabricated using spray-on techniques and positioned near the leading edge of the swept-wing, while infrared thermography is used to detect and quantify transition location. Results from both the simplified model and experiment indicate that forcing along the local cross-flow component promotes transition while forcing against successfully delays transition. This is the first experimental demonstration of swept-wing transition delay via base-flow modification using plasma actuators.

Information

Type
JFM Rapids
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2018
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic of the forcing mechanism (not to scale). Inviscid streamline (thin black line) and local velocity components ($u_{ISL},w_{ISL}$). DRE arrangement (●) and plasma actuator exposed electrode (grey bar). (a) $-F_{x}$ plasma forcing (red arrows); (b) $F_{x}$ plasma forcing (blue arrows).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Time-averaged induced velocity-magnitude field for $V_{pp}=9~\text{kV}$, $f_{ac}=10~\text{kHz}$ (six levels from 0 (white) to $3~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$ (black)). The two grey lines below $y=0$ depict the electrodes of the AC-DBD plasma actuator. (b) Body force computed using the empirical model by Maden et al. (2013) (six levels from 0 (white) to $3~\text{kN}~\text{m}^{-3}$ (black)). (c) Variation of momentum coefficient $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}$ with input peak-to-peak voltage $V_{pp}$ (○: $U_{\infty }=25~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$, ▵: $U_{\infty }=27.5~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$, ▫: $U_{\infty }=30~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Computed boundary layer velocity profiles for $Re_{c}=2.1\times 10^{6}$ ($U_{\infty }=25~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$), parallel ($u_{ISL}$: dashed line) and perpendicular ($w_{ISL}$: solid line, magnified by factor of three) to the local inviscid streamline at three chord locations, namely: (a) $x/c=0.05$, (b) $x/c=0.1$ and (c) $x/c=0.3$. The three cases shown are: baseline (black), $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=-0.71$ (dark grey), $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=0.71$ (light grey). The wall normal axis is non-dimensionalised with the boundary layer thickness based on $0.99\cdot u_{ISL}$ from the local unforced profile.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Streamwise amplification rate ($-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{i}c$) (15 levels from 0 (white) to 65 (black)) (spanwise wavenumber $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{r}=2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{z}$). Black contour lines show the amplification factor ($N$). Dash-dotted black line indicates the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{z,crit}=8~\text{mm}$ mode. The three cases shown are: (a) baseline, (b) $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=-0.71$, (c) $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=0.71$. Vertical arrows in (b) and (c) represent the location of the plasma forcing.

Figure 4

Figure 5. IR thermography mean fields ($Re_{c}=2.1\times 10^{6}$, $U_{\infty }=25~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$). The flow comes from the left. The IR mean fields are dewarped and plotted in the $xz$ plane. (a) Baseline. (b) $-F_{x}$ ($c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=-0.71$). (c) Subtraction of (a) from (b). (d) Baseline. (e) $F_{x}$ ($c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}=0.71$). (f) Subtraction of (d) from (e). The solid white lines represent constant chord positions. Dashed line at $x/c=0.15$ refers to figure 6(a).

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Normalised wavenumber spectra along dashed line in figure 5(a), (b) and (e). Baseline (black line), $-F_{x}$ (dark grey), $F_{x}$ (light grey). $-F_{x}$ and $F_{x}$ cases are shifted by 1 and 2 for better visualisation. (b) $N$ factors of the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{z,crit}=8~\text{mm}$ stationary CFI mode. Location of DRE (dotted line) and location of plasma actuator (dashed line). Experimental transition locations (▫). Baseline $N_{crit}\approx 5.6$ (dash-dotted line).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Experimentally measured transition locations ($x_{tr}/c$) versus momentum coefficient $c_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}$ (○: $Re_{c}=2.1\times 10^{6}$, $U_{\infty }=25~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$, ▵: $Re_{c}=2.3\times 10^{6}$, $U_{\infty }=27.5~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$, ▫: $Re_{c}=2.5\times 10^{6}$, $U_{\infty }=30~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$, ●: transition location predicted by the simplified numerical model for $Re_{c}=2.1\times 10^{6}$, $U_{\infty }=25~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$).