Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:06:15.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A perspective on triplet fusion upconversion: triplet sensitizers beyond quantum dots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2019

Zachary A. VanOrman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, 95 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
Alexander S. Bieber
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, 95 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
Sarah Wieghold
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, 95 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
Lea Nienhaus*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, 95 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Lea Nienhaus at lnienhaus@fsu.edu

Abstract

The processes of singlet fission and triplet fusion could allow state-of-the-art photovoltaic devices to surpass the Shockley–Queisser limit by optimizing the utilized solar spectrum by reducing thermal relaxation and inaccessible sub-bandgap photons, respectively. Triplet fusion demands precise control of the spin-triplet state population, and requires a sensitizer to efficiently populate the triplet state of an acceptor molecule. In this perspective, we highlight the established field of sensitized upconversion and further examine alternative triplet sensitization routes, including the possibility of bulk solid-state semiconductors as triplet sensitizers, which provide a new avenue for charge transfer-based triplet sensitization rather than excitonic triplet energy transfer.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) The PL power dependency of different sensitizer concentrations of a solution-based palladium(II)tetrakisquinoxalinoporphyrin (PQ4Pd)/rubrene upconversion system where both maximized performance is observed above the intensity threshold (linear dependence, slope = 1), as well as a quadratic dependency (slope = 2) below the threshold intensity Ith. Adapted from Ref. [36] with permission from the PCCP Owner Societies. (b) PL power dependence of a palladium(II)octaethylporphyrin (PdOEP)/DPA mixture. Adapted from Ref. [37] with permission. Copyright 2012 The American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz300012u. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS. (c) PL power dependency of a platinum(II)octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP)/DPA mixture. The upconverted emission is shown as blue circles where the phosphorescent emission from PtOEP is shown as red circles. Adapted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2008 American Physical Society.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Metal–organic-sensitized TTA-UC: intersystem crossing (ISC) from the singlet to the triplet state, followed by triplet–triplet energy transfer (TTET). Subsequent TTA of two triplets T1 yields the higher-energy emissive singlet state. (b) Quantum dot-sensitized TTA-UC: energy transfer (ET) from the conduction band (CB) to the triplet state T1. The collision of two triplet states leads to TTA and emission from a higher energy singlet state. Adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (c) In a PbS core QD with a CdS shell, the UC QY when coupled with rubrene initially increases when the thickness of the CdS shell is increased. However, after reaching a maximum, the upconversion QY diminishes with increasing shell thickness, as the shell imposes an additional tunneling barrier. (d) Upconversion QY of four different PbS–CdS core–shell QD systems as a function of the CdS shell thickness and the PbS core dimension. Adapted with permission from Ref. [68]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03503. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic detailing two approaches toward QD sensitization. Strategy A is the direct sensitization of the acceptor triplet state (T*), whereas strategy B uses sensitization of a transmitter ligand (9-ACA) that consequently performs triplet energy transfer to the acceptor. Reproduced from Ref. [33] with permission. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02130. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS.

Figure 3

Figure 4. The effect of AlQ3 thickness on the absorption of the NC layer and the UCPL. The NC layer absorption enhancement (green) decreases upon the increase of the thickness AlQ3 layer, while the UCPL is enhanced from the up to a thickness of the AlQ3 layer of 30 nm after which it then decreases. Adapted from Ref. [70] with the permission of AIP Publishing.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) UC PL monitored at 532 nm different excitation intensities. (b) Power dependence of the UC emission intensity at 430 nm. The Ith, 25 mW/cm2, is found at the intersection between the lines of slope = 2 and slope = 1. Reproduced from Ref. [67] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Transient absorption (TA) spectra of a CsPbBr3–PCA complex with an edge length of L = 4.9 nm at different delay times, λex = 470 nm. (b) TA kinetics at 423 nm (top, open symbols, PCA triplet absorption) and 474 nm (bottom, solid symbols, CsPbBr3 exciton bleach) for CsPbBr3 and the CsPbBr3–PCA complex with L = 4.9 nm. The solid lines correspond to stretched exponential fits for each decay trace. (c) TA spectra of the CsPbBr3 NC-PCA system with an edge length of L = 9.4 nm, λex = 470 nm. (d) TA kinetics at 430 nm (top, open symbols) and 502 nm for CsPbBr3 and CsPbBr3–PCA complex with L = 9.4 nm. Reproduced from Ref. [71] with permission. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b13180. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (a) Steady-state PL of 2D (MA)2Pb(SCN)2I2 with chlorobenzene (solid line) and with rubrene solution-cast from chlorobenzene (dotted line) added. (b) Time-resolved PL of (MA)2Pb(SCN)2I2 with chlorobenzene (dark squares for 101 nm film, open triangle for 213 nm film) and with rubrene (filled triangle for 101 nm film and upside-down open triangle for 213 nm film). (c) Absorption spectrum (gray) and steady-state PL (black) of rubrene under 485 nm excitation. (d) Schematic of triplet exciton diffusion across the perovskite film, leading to TTET at the interface of the perovskite/rubrene layers. Reproduced from Ref. [73] with permission. Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons.

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Normalized absorption spectrum of the perovskite thin film (black) and the bilayer upconversion device (gray), consisting of the perovskite layer and a rubrene layer doped with 1% DBP, as well as steady-state PL of perovskite film emission (brown dotted line) and upconverted emission from the DBP (red dotted line). UC emission can be seen as an orange line when the device is exposed to a 785 nm laser, displayed in the figure inset. (b) UC device schematic, where, when under 785 nm excitation, emission at 610 nm from the DBP excited state occurs. Band energy diagram showing charge transfer from the perovskite to rubrene. The triplet state of rubrene is populated via hole extraction from the valence band (VB) of the perovskite, while the electron is extracted from the conduction band (CB) of the perovskite to the triplet state T1 of rubrene. The mismatch in energy blocks direct injection of the electron to the LUMO of rubrene. (c) Magnetic field effect (MFE) on perovskite emission (black) and upconverted emission (red). (d) Power dependence of the perovskite emission (black) and the upconverted emission (red). The slope intersection denotes the Ith of 500 mW/cm2. Adapted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00283. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS.

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) Processes occurring in the UC bilayer device upon excitation at 780 nm. (1) An electron is excited from the valence band to the conduction band in the perovskite film. This electron can be quenched by multiple possible pathways: (2) bimolecular free carrier recombination, (3) shallow trap filling, (4) monomolecular trap-assisted recombination, or (5) charge transfer to rubrene. Adapted from Ref. [20] Copyright 2019 with permission from Elsevier. (b) The Ith of the MAFA/rub. devices as a function of their thicknesses. The device from Ref. [19] is denoted by the red triangle, as it was measured with a pulsed excitation source. All others measured using continuous wave (CW) excitation.

Figure 9

Figure 10. (a) MAFA PL lifetimes (>800 nm) as a result of incident power (4 µW in black, 2 µW in purple) as well as the addition of a chopper wheel (gray). (b) UC PL lifetimes (560–640 nm) monitored in the same manner as the MAFA PL lifetimes. (c) A zoomed-in view of (b), detailing the different rise times shown under the three measurement conditions. (d) A schematic showing the effect of a chopper with a 25 ms “off time” (time in between pulse) on the triplet population. (e) A schematic showing the triplet population increasing without decay with no “off time” from the laser. (f) Schematic detailing TTA as a result of slow triplet diffusion, where the triplet states have longer diffusion lengths due to relatively low triplet concentrations in the annihilator. (g) Schematic detailing TTA as a result of smaller triplet diffusion lengths and a larger concentration of triplet states. Back transfer of singlet states is more prevalent due to TTA occurring close to the sensitizer. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01526. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS.