Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:48:36.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability in vitamin D assessment and supplementation for children and adolescents: a survey of paediatricians in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2026

Corinne Jotterand Chaparro*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Geneva, Switzerland
Valeria A. Bertoni Maluf
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Geneva, Switzerland
Fanny Rochat
Affiliation:
HES-SO Master, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Jessica Ezri
Affiliation:
Vidymed, Lausanne, Switzerland
Angeline Chatelan
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Geneva, Switzerland
Laetitia-Marie Petit
Affiliation:
Gastroentérologie pédiatrique, Centre Crohn et Colite, Hôpital de La Tour, Geneva, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author: Corinne Jotterand Chaparro; Email: corinne.jotterand@hesge.ch

Abstract

In Switzerland, as in many other countries, national guidelines recommend individualized rather than systematic vitamin D supplementation in children beyond the age of three, making routine assessment challenging. This study aimed to examine paediatricians’ reported practices and opinions regarding vitamin D management in children aged 3–17 years in Geneva, Switzerland. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to 193 paediatricians, of whom 59 completed the questionnaire (85% women). The questionnaire covered assessment frequency and methods, deficiency management, and views on systematic supplementation. Fewer than half reported assessing vitamin D adequacy at every check-up, with 49% (n = 29) for children aged 3–10 years and 44% (n = 26) for adolescents. Among children with clinical signs of deficiency, 76% (n = 45) reported assessment at every check-up, compared with 63% (n = 37) for children with dark skin or chronic digestive disorders and 58% (n = 34) for those with overweight or obesity. Assessments relied mainly on reported supplementation, followed by diet and sun exposure. Regarding prophylactic supplementation, 61% of paediatricians were in favour for children aged 3–10 years and 76% for those aged 11–17 years. Among those opposed, the main reason cited was the absence of clear national guidelines. Overall, this survey highlights marked variability in paediatricians’ approaches to vitamin D, with routine assessment remaining infrequent, even among children with clinical signs of deficiency. This gap may leave vulnerable children and adolescents with undetected deficiency, underscoring the need for harmonized national guidance and targeted educational initiatives to support preventive paediatric care.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of surveyed paediatriciansTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Frequency of vitamin D adequacy (VDA) assessment by pediatricians in children and adolescents without specific risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Frequency of Vitamin D adequacy (VDA) assessment by paediatricians in children and adolescents with specific risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Interventions used by paediatricians in children with serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations <50 nmol/L.

Figure 4

Table 2. Paediatricians’ opinions on key aspects of vitamin D managementTable 2 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Paediatricians’ opinions on systematic vitamin D supplementation in all children and adolescents.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Reasons for not using systematic vitamin D supplementation in all children and adolescents.