Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T13:30:20.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meltwater circulation and permeability of Arctic summer sea ice derived from hydrological field experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Johannes Freitag
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, P.O. Box 120161, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany E-mail: jfreitag@awi-bremerhaven.de
Hajo Eicken
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757320, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7320, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Permeability and meltwater flow have been studied in sea ice in the Siberian and central Arctic during the summers of 1995 and 1996. A bail-test technique has been adapted to allow for measurements of in situ permeability, found to range between 10−11 and 10−8 m2. Permeability varied by about a factor of 2 between 1995 (above-normal melt rates) and 1996 (below-normal melt rates). Release of fluorescent tracers (fluorescein, rhodamine) furthermore allowed the derivation of flow velocities and assessment of the relevant driving forces. Hydraulic gradients in rough ice and wind stress in ponded ice were found to be particularly important, driving meltwater over distances of several meters per day. The mid- to late-summer ice was found to be permeable enough to completely divert meltwater from the surface into the ice interior. It is shown, however, that lower permeabilities of the upper ice layers as well as refreezing of meltwater, particularly during the early melt season, foster the development of surface melt ponds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2003
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the site locations during the expeditions in 1995 and 1996. The position of a buoy deployed in 1995 and resampled in 1996 is also indicated.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Experimental set-up of an in situ bail test. (b) A time series of the hydraulic head recorded within the borehole. The measurements are represented by open circles; the dashed line is an exponential fit to the data in the laminar branch of the curve.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Model calculations of the pressure field during a bail test for three different ratios between lateral permeability kl and vertical permeability kv. In a vertical cross-section the initial isobars are plotted for constant intervals. (a) The simulation with laterally impermeable ice; (b) the case for a ratio of kl/kv = 0.1; and (c) the isotropic case with kl = kv .

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Relationship between discharge and ice thickness L underneath the borehole in a simulated bail-test geometry. The model runs are performed in ice with kl/kv = 1(isotropic), 0.1, 0.01 and 0 (laterally impermeable). The hydraulic head is kept constant. The total ice thickness is 1, 2 and 4 m.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Relationship between the derived correction factor γ and ice thickness L underneath the borehole. γ depends linearly on L with rising slopes for increasing kl/kv ratio which reflects the enhanced inflow due to lateral permeability.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Time series of the hydraulic head measured repeatedly at the same blind hole.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Frequency distributions of in situ permeabilities measured during the expedition in summer 1995 (solid line), 1996 (dotted line) and for artificial sea ice measured by Saeki and others (1986) in the laboratory (dashed line). (b) The fate of meltwater illustrated in a cross-section through an ice floe. Depending on permeability, the meltwater either percolates downwards and disappears from the ice surface (k>kcrit) or is partially retained at the ice surface (k<kcrit).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Pore-channel radii derived from flow-regime transitions in the measured time series vs permeability. Data of the 1995 expedition are shown as open circles, data for 1996 as open squares. For comparison, the maximum accessible tube radius is plotted as a dotted line based on Equation (2).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Tracer site R11219/220 in deformed ice with concentration profiles along four transects (T1, T2, T3, T4). The graphs show the profiles 3 hours (solid circles) and 16 hours (open circles) after dye injection. Gray areas are melt ponds.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Tracer site R11220/221 in deformed ice with concentration profiles along three transects (T1, T2, T3). The graphs show the profiles 9.5 hours (solid circles), 16 hours (open circles) and 22 hours (crosses) after dye injection. Gray areas are melt ponds.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Concentration profiles along wind direction at tracer site R11216 in level ice. The graph shows the initial concentration (solid circles) and the profile 9 hours (open circles) after dye injection.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Concentration profiles at tracer site R11247 in level ice. The graph shows profiles along two transects intersecting at right angles for the initial concentration (dotted line), and the profiles 4 hours (solid circles) and 14 hours (open circles) after dye injection.