Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:28:47.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rake-shaped microstrip sensors with high spatial resolution for analyzing liquid food quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Nitika*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
Jaswinder Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
Rajesh Khanna
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
*
Author for correspondence: Nitika, E-mail: nnitika_phd19@thapar.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, a novel microstrip antenna sensor with defected ground structure is investigated to detect the presence of other substances in liquid food samples. The proposed antenna sensor is rake-shaped which has been designed using time domain solver in three-dimensional simulation software Computer Simulation Technology Microwave Studio. The proposed antenna sensor has been fabricated using an FR4 material, having overall dimensions of 30 × 27 mm2 with dielectric constant 4.4, substrate thickness 1.57 mm, and loss tangent 0.0025. Furthermore, the Q-factor of the proposed antenna sensor is 485 showing a maximum sensitivity of 700 MHz and having accuracy 98%. In the present work, water and juice are considered as liquid samples in which the presence of foreign substances is detected in terms of reflection coefficient and shift in resonant frequency with the help of the suggested microstrip antenna sensor. Through experimentation, it has been observed that with the increase in the percentage of adulterant in the considered samples, the dielectric property of solution changes which results in shift of reflection coefficient and resonant frequency, thus making an allowance for the proposed antenna sensor a valid tool to detect adulteration in liquid samples.

Information

Type
RFID and Sensors
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometrical configuration of the proposed antenna as a liquid sensor: (a) top view in CST and (b) bottom view in CST.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Parametric sweep for (a) slot 7 in radiating patch and (b) reduced ground plane y-axis.

Figure 2

Table 1. Optimized dimensions of proposed antenna as a liquid sensor

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Top view of the fabricated prototype and (b) bottom view of the fabricated prototype with a four-hole SMA connector.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Fabricated prototype: (a) simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna and (b) snapshot of measurement with the VNA.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Simulated and measured gain and (b) simulated and measured radiation efficiency for the proposed antenna.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Simulated surface current distribution at 14.32 GHz for the proposed antenna (a) on the ground plane and (b) on the radiating patch.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Comparison of simulated and measured co and cross polarization at 14.32 GHz: (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane for the proposed antenna.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Photograph of the experimental setup during measurement: (a) water and (b) juice of the proposed antenna as a sensor.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Variation in reflection coefficient (dB) in water and juice with respect to free space.

Figure 10

Table 2. Measured resonant frequency, dielectric permittivity and sensitivity of the MUT

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Variation in reflection coefficient (dB) in water with different percentages of (a) salt, (b) sugar, and (c) glucose.

Figure 12

Table 3. Reproducibility data and LOD for adulteration in water

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Variation in reflection coefficient (dB) in juice with different percentages of (a) sugar, (b) jaggery, and (c) honey.

Figure 14

Table 4. Reproducibility data and LOD for adulteration in juice

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Variation in reflection coefficient at 20, 40, 60, and 80% concentrations for (a) water with salt, sugar, and glucose and (b) juice with sugar, jaggery, and honey.

Figure 16

Table 5. Comparison of the proposed sensor with earlier reported work in terms of analytical performance