Evidence for large intestinal amino acid and peptide carriers in the large intestine of various species

It has been shown that larger, more complex molecules such as thiamine, folate, biotin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid are actively absorbed across the large intestine wall and make a significant contribution to vitamin homeostasis of humans and animals⁽Reference Said and Mohammed¹³⁾. Molecular techniques have been developed and improved over the last decade and used to determine the existence of amino acid transport systems in the caecum and colon of a number of non-ruminant species. These techniques provide novel insights to the amino acid and peptide uptake capacity of the large intestine. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) which conveys the transport of large branched and neutral aromatic amino acids, is expressed along the whole mouse intestine, including the caecum⁽Reference Hatanaka, Huang and Nakanishi¹⁹⁾. LAT2 expression was not found in the human colon but occurred weakly in mouse colon⁽Reference Prasad, Wang and Huang²⁰⁾. Western blot analysis on freshly isolated rat intestinal cells demonstrated that LAT1 and LAT2 are intensively expressed in both the small and large intestine. Expression of LAT1 in the colon was 2-fold that in the jejunum and 3-fold that in the ileum⁽Reference Fraga, Pinho and Soares-da-Silva²¹⁾. Recently, it has been demonstrated by RT-PCR that the mRNA abundance of LAT3 is almost similar or greater in the caecum and colon respectively of the equine intestinal tract compared with the small intestine, suggesting that the large intestine might contribute to both cationic and neutral amino acid uptake and absorption⁽Reference Woodward, Holcombe and Steibel²²⁾. Immunohistochemistry has demonstrated that in the human colon glycine transporter 1 (GLYT1; SLC6A9) protein is localised to the membrane of cells lining the crypts with strong staining at both apical and basal surfaces⁽Reference Howard, Tahir and Javed²³⁾. In humans, excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1) has been found to be abundantly expressed in the colon as well as the small intestine. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that solute carrier family 6 (amino acid transporter) member 14 (SLC6A14, ATB0+) is expressed throughout the whole colon in humans, with the highest level in the descending segment⁽Reference Anderson, Howard and Walters²⁴⁾. Northern blot analysis showed a similar distribution of SCL6A14 in the intestinal tract of the black bear, with high levels in the distal region compared to the proximal part of the intestine⁽Reference Gilbert, Wong and Vaughan²⁵⁾. Strikingly, SLC6A14 showed an apparent affinity for several D-amino acids⁽Reference Ugawa, Sunouchi and Ueda²⁶⁾. Its colonic expression may have relevance for the absorption of bacterially derived D-amino acids as D-serine is transported by SLC6A14⁽Reference Hatanaka, Huang and Nakanishi¹⁹⁾. Alternatively, as SLC6A14 is also able to transport carnitine, it is possible that SLC6A14 plays a role in the colonic absorption of carnitine and in this way competes with colonic bacteria for carnitine in the lumen⁽Reference Nakanishi, Hatanaka and Huang²⁷⁾. Two members of the high-affinity glutamate transporter family have been described: ASC transporter 1 (ASCT1) and ASCT2⁽Reference Kanai and Hediger²⁸⁾. In addition, to alanine, serine, and cysteine, ASCT1 and ASCT2 also transport glutamate with low affinity at neutral pH and with increased affinity at reduced pH. ASCT2 appears to be located in the apical membrane, and in the rabbit there is a gradient along the small and large intestine; i.e. ASCT2 expression is lowest in the duodenum and highest in caecum and colon⁽Reference Avissar, Ryan and Ganapathy²⁹⁾. However, because of its antiporter system, it is questionable whether ASCT2 could contribute to net transport of neutral amino acids across the apical membrane⁽Reference Bröer³⁰⁾. Proton-dependent amino acid transporter 1 (PAT1) is a pH-dependent, low-affinity, high-capacity transporter for both taurine and β-alanine⁽Reference Anderson, Howard and Walters²⁴⁾, and PAT1 mRNA has been detected in human small intestine and ascending colon⁽Reference Anderson, Grenade and Boll³¹⁾. Immunostaining demonstrated an apical localization of PAT1 in rat and human small intestine⁽Reference Anderson, Grenade and Boll³¹⁾. Mouse PAT1 shows the highest expression in the small intestine and colon, whereas PAT2 was hardly detectable⁽Reference Boll, Foltz and Rubio-Aliaga³²⁾. In humans, expression of PAT1 mRNA was detected throughout the whole length of the intestine, from duodenum to descending colon⁽Reference Anderson, Howard and Walters²⁴⁾. Besides amino acid transport, PAT1 and PAT2 expression in oocytes revealed that these proton amino acid transporters can transport short-chain fatty acids. PAT1 is most likely the low-affinity transporter of taurine in the luminal membrane of human enterocytes⁽Reference Anderson, Howard and Walters²⁴⁾. Another intestinal carrier that mediates taurine and beta-alanine transport across the apical brush-border of the intestine is the taurine transporter (TauT, SLC6A6). This transporter is expressed along the entire human intestinal tract, including the ascending, transverse, and descending colon as determined by RT-PCR⁽Reference Anderson, Howard and Walters²⁴⁾. The transporter also has weak affinity for neutral amino acids such as phenylalanine. It has been shown by RT-PCR that in the rat proline transporter (SIT1, SLC6A20) expression was significant in the small intestine with lesser expression in the caecum and colon⁽Reference Takanaga, Mackenzie and Suzuki³³⁾. The distribution of peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) expression in the intestinal tract is controversial. In most studies, PEPT1 mRNA was not observed in the colon of rats⁽Reference Shen, Smith and Brosius³⁴⁾, pigs⁽Reference Chen, Wong and Webb³⁵⁾, dairy cows⁽Reference Chen, Wong and Webb³⁵⁾, or healthy humans⁽Reference Adibi³⁶⁾. However, others reported a weaker but still significant mRNA expression of PEPT1 in human colon, compared with the small intestine⁽Reference Ziegler, Fernandez-Estivariz and Gu³⁷⁾. PEPT1 mRNA was detected in human colon at approximately fivefold lower levels than found in the ileum⁽Reference Zhang, Emerick and Pak^38, Reference Ford, Howard and Hirst³⁹⁾. Western blot analysis on various intestinal segments of the rat revealed positive staining for PEPT1 in the small intestine, with the strongest staining in jejunum, whereas no signal was detectable in the colon⁽Reference Zhang, Emerick and Pak³⁸⁾. PEPT2 expression was detected by RT-PCR equally in the small and large intestine of human and rhesus monkey⁽Reference Zhang, Emerick and Pak³⁸⁾.

Although amino acid transport systems are present in the large intestine of humans and a number of animal species, substrate availability may be limited. The caecal and colonic microbiota reside in an anaerobic environment and a significant number are amino acid fermenting species⁽Reference Smith and Macfarlane^40, Reference Cotta, Whitehead and Zeltwanger⁴¹⁾. Undigested and endogenous proteins, peptides, and amino acids can be metabolised by these species in the large intestine by the action of proteases, peptidases, and amino acid deaminases and decarboxylases yielding a large number of luminal metabolites including ammonia) (NH₃), short-chain fatty acids, branched-chain fatty acids, phenols, indols, amines, hydrogen, carbon dioxide_, and methane⁽Reference Smith and Macfarlane^40, Reference Blachier, Mariotti and Huneau⁴²⁾. The proximal and distal colon content in humans can contain free amino acids in millimolar amounts with hydroxyproline, alanine, lysine, and valine being most prominently available. Free amino acid concentrations increase distally for a number of the amino acids including lysine, alanine, valine, and glutamine. Also relatively large quantities of soluble protein and peptides can be present in the luminal content throughout the large intestine⁽Reference Smith and MacFarlane⁴³⁾. In rabbits, the caecum, upper colon and lower colon also contain millimolar amounts of free amino acids with glutamic acid, alanine, aspartic acid, glycine, and lysine being most abundant⁽Reference Hoover and Heitmann⁴⁴⁾. Based on these studies it appears that free amino acids, either of dietary, endogenous, or bacterial origin are present in the digesta of the large intestine and could potentially be absorbed by transported systems present in this part of the gastrointestinal tract. Evidence suggests that the substrate preference of intestinal bacteria are NH₃ and peptides rather than amino acids⁽Reference Smith and MacFarlane⁴³⁾ making peptide transport less likely.

Several in vivo and in vitro studies have been designed to determine the absorption of amino acids from the large intestine in a number of species including humans, pigs, poultry, horses, and dogs. Two of the species where large intestinal amino acid absorption might be expected to contribute significantly to overall amino acid supply due to their copious large intestine are horses and rabbits, although rabbits perform coprophagia enabling utilisation of bacterial synthesised amino acids. Slade et al. ⁽Reference Slade, Bishop and Morris⁴⁵⁾ injected a ¹⁵N labelled cell suspension into the caecum of a horse and found labelled dietary essential and non-essential amino acids in serum from the caecal vein. As most amino acids can be labeled through transamination, the latter however cannot be considered direct evidence for the absorption of intact amino acids from the large intestine. Infusion of 75 g of lysine in the caecum of horses did not result in increases in plasma lysine⁽Reference Wysocki and Baker⁴⁶⁾ indicating that there is no significant absorption of lysine from the large intestine of the horse. Recently, Woodward et al. ⁽Reference Woodward, Holcombe and Steibel²²⁾ reported the presence of cationic and neutral amino acid transporter transcripts in the caecum, left ventral and dorsal colon that could facilitate the transport of amino acids across the large intestine. Furthermore, significant reflux of caecal content into the ileum is possible in horses. Unlike humans and dogs where most of the propagated ileocolonic sphincter contractions originate from the ileum, in horses approximately two-thirds originate from the extended caecum which is followed by a decrease in ileal pH indicative of reflux of caecal content⁽Reference Malbert⁴⁷⁾, thereby providing a potential means of absorbing dietary and microbial peptides and amino acids. The topic of peptide and amino acid absorption from the large intestine of horses however remains controversial⁽Reference Santos, Rodrigues and Bessa⁴⁸⁾. In birds, amino acid absorption from the caeca is possible⁽Reference Obst and Diamond^49, Reference Planas, González and Ferrer⁵⁰⁾ and may potentially contribute to overall amino acid supply. Although the proximal colon of the 3-day-old pig has been reported to be able to absorb amino acids⁽Reference Sepúlveda and Smith⁵¹⁾, this ability appears to be lost with increasing age. Infusing free amino acids into the caecum and colon of horses⁽Reference Wysocki and Baker⁴⁶⁾ and pigs⁽Reference Darragh, Cranwell and Moughan⁵²⁾ has not shown significant amino acid absorption in vivo. However the possibility of reflux of caecal contents might be a means of absorbing microbially synthesised and unabsorbed dietary and endogenous amino acids and peptides. Infusing the caecum of a pig with ¹⁵N labelled amino acids from a bacterial cell suspension⁽Reference Niiyama, Deguchi and Kagota⁵³⁾ has been reported to result in the appearance of labelled free amino acids in the venous blood of the colon.

It is the current consensus that although some absorption of amino acids may occur, the large intestine does not contribute significantly to the amino acid supply of pigs, humans, dogs, and horses⁽Reference Fuller and Tomé^10, Reference Moughan^{54, 55)}. In chickens and other birds however, there may be significant absorption of amino acids, although confirmatory evidence is needed. Recently developed molecular techniques have provided new insights into the amino acid and peptide uptake potential of the large intestine with a greater focus towards specific carrier systems than before, allowing a more targeted evaluation of the importance of the large intestine to overall amino acid supply in non-ruminant animals.

Apparent ileal and faecal N and amino acid digestibility values in various species

As there appears to be no significant absorption of amino acids from the large intestine of non-ruminant species, observed hindgut N disappearance in ileal and faecal N digestibility studies are the predominant result of absorption of NH₃ liberated from amino acid catabolism by microbial deaminases. Few studies have reported the difference between apparent ileal and faecal digestibility of N and amino acids in human subjects by direct comparison. Data from Gibson et al. ⁽Reference Gibson, Sladen and Dawson³⁾ show that differences between faecal and ileal N digestibility as measured in normal subjects or subjects with an ileostomy or ileo-rectal anastomosis consuming a low (40 g/d) and high (100 g/d) crude protein diet were 9·4 and 6·4 %, respectively. The difference in apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility of a meat, vegetable, fruit, bread, and dairy product based diet between ileostomates and subjects with a functioning large intestine was reported to not differ statistically (86·9 vs. 88·9 %)⁽Reference Rowan, Moughan and Wilson⁴⁾. However statistically significantly higher apparent faecal amino acid digestibility values were reported for arginine (2·4 %), aspartic acid (2·4 %), serine (5·4 %), threonine (4·4 %), proline (4·7 %), glycine (15·0 %), phenylalanine (1·7 %), and tryptophan (5·9 %). A significantly lower value (ileal <  faecal) was reported for methionine (9·8 %). Recently, using the naso-intestinal intubation technique, the difference in true ileal and faecal N digestibility of subjects consuming ¹⁵N labelled milk was found to be not statistically significant (95·5 vs. 96·6 %)⁽Reference Bos, Mahe and Gaudichon⁵⁾. These data indicate that although differences in site of sampling have been observed to be significant, differences in humans appear to be small for N and only certain amino acids show statistically significant differences. These studies however have all used relatively highly digestible diets. In general, the lower the ileal protein and amino acid digestibility, the larger the potential error when measuring faecal amino acid or N digestibility.

To determine the magnitude of the inaccuracy in apparent faecal N digestibility (i.e. the faecal-ileal digestibility differences) with decreasing protein digestibility, so as to allow extrapolation to humans, a literature review was conducted. Data were obtained from peer reviewed publications reporting apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility in the same diet for a number of animal species including horses, rabbits, rats, pigs, dogs, blue foxes, and chickens. Besides N digestibility data, information was collected for daily dietary N intake and the body weights of the animals. Table 1 gives an overview of the differences observed in these studies between apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility. The largest number of studies was found for growing pigs followed by adult dogs. No studies were found for cats, guinea pigs or mice. Figure 1 shows the data for pigs and adult dogs (panel A) and horses, rabbits, and rats (panel B) and the linear regression line for each species. In all species apparent faecal N digestibility was generally higher than the corresponding ileal digestibility values and the differences between apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility decreased with increasing apparent ileal digestibility. For sows, horses, and rats, the slope of the linear regression line was the lowest (0·137, 0·318, and 0·342, respectively) followed by the dog (0·491) and growing pig (0·710). A more extensive deviation from a slope of 1·0 indicates a lesser concordance between apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility. Diet composition can be considered one of the major determinants of this lack of concordance. This is shown by the within-study variation in the difference between apparent ileal and faecal N digestibility for different protein sources (e.g. 7·0 and 15·6 % in dogs⁽Reference Murray, Patil and Fahey⁵⁶⁾ and 3 to 19 % in growing pigs⁽Reference Knabe, LaRue and Gregg⁵⁷⁾) or when fermentable fibres are supplied stimulating microbial protein synthesis (e.g. 10·8 to 30·4 % in dogs⁽Reference Propst, Flickinger and Bauer⁵⁸⁾). The relationship for young and growing pigs was less clear, partly due to the absence of accurate information on the body weight of the animals and some of the experimental dietary treatments in the dataset. The average (minimal and maximal) apparent large intestinal N digestibility was 65·8 % for horses (42·0 to 80·5 %), 33·7 % for dogs ( − 19·9 to 70·2 %), 34·6 % for sows (17·1 to 59·3 %), and 30·5 % for growing pigs ( − 24·6 to 89·3 %) (data not shown). Overall, these data show a significant disappearance of N from the large intestine for a number of non-ruminant species. Notable is the small disappearance of N from the large intestine of chickens and blue foxes (Table 1). For the latter species however, the dataset was limited to relatively highly digestible diets (81-86 %) as for humans.

Table 1

Overview of ileal apparent N digestibility data and the difference between ileal and faecal apparent dietary N digestibility according to animal species

* (faecal apparent dietary N digestibility − ileal apparent dietary N digestibility) × 100.

Fig. 1

(a) Ileal vs. faecal apparent N digestibility data for sows, growing pigs, and dogs with trend lines. (b) Ileal vs. faecal apparent N digestibility data for horses, rats, and rabbits with trend lines.

The large quantity of N disappearing from the large intestine is likely a direct result of the deamination of amino acids (dietary or endogenous) or catabolism of other N-containing compounds such as urea to NH₃ by the microbiota, with subsequent diffusion of NH₃ across the intestinal wall and excretion in the urine⁽Reference Fuller and Tomé^10, Reference Moughan^54, Reference Stevens and Hume^59, Reference Williams, Verstegen and Tamminga⁶⁰⁾. Figure 2 presents the daily apparent dietary N uptake per unit metabolic body weight (BW^0·75, MBW) in relation to the daily apparent dietary large intestinal N inflow for horses, dogs, and sows. The extent of N disappearance in the large intestine is represented by the slope(s) of the regression lines, and indicates that the largest amount of protein per unit MBW is fermented in horses, followed by dogs, and then pigs. For the horse, apparent dietary N disappearance from the large intestine was approximately 79 % of the apparent dietary N entering from the ileum. In adult dogs, 46 % disappears in the large intestine while 34 % disappears from sows. The position of the dog in this sequence may be somewhat surprising as dogs are adaptive carnivores. Urea is entering the gut in all gut segments but it is most effectively recycled in the hindgut where a transepethilial concentration is maintained by ureolytic bacteria⁽Reference Stevens and Hume⁵⁹⁾. Urea recycling reduces the magnitude of the dietary N disappearance from the hindgut and underestimates the magnitude of hindgut amino acid catabolism if ileal and faecal digestibility values are used.

Fig. 2

Daily apparent dietary large intestinal N uptake per unit metabolic body weight in relation to the daily apparent dietary large intestinal N inflow for sows, growing pigs, dogs, and horses.

To which animal species can human large intestinal fermentation be best compared?

The growing pig is often supported as a model animal for digestion studies in adult humans^(10,54) although they are fed well above their maintenance requirements unlike adult humans who have an energy intake around maintenance. The digestion/fermentation of amino acids in the large intestine (caecum and colon) of non-ruminants is affected by digesta transit time. The extent of fermentation occurring in the caecum and colon of non-ruminants will also depend on the differentiation that these two structures have undergone throughout evolution. Quantitative morphometric data of the intestinal tract of a number of laboratory animals (mice, rats, and guinea pigs), companion animals (cats, dogs, and horses), production animals (pigs) and humans based on planimetry of the entire digestive tract combined with assessment of surface area enlargement due to microscopically important structural entities such as visible villi, crypts, mounds, plicaecirculares, “opened crypts” in caecum or colon have been reported⁽Reference Snipes and Kriete^61, Reference Snipes and Snipes⁶²⁾. Not included is the surface enlargement due to microvilli which increases gut surface area significantly. Snipes⁽Reference Snipes⁶³⁾ estimated that the surface enlargement factors due to microvilli in the caecum and the colon of the giant pouch rat are 15 and 19-20 fold while in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum factors of 21, 26 and 24 were reported. Although this morphometric information is important to determine total surface area, villous atrophy is known to occur due to changes in nutrient supply, bioactive dietary components, luminal microbiota, toxins, and disease⁽Reference McGowan, Campbell and Jewell^64–Reference Trbojevic-Stankovic, Milicevic and Milosevic⁶⁷⁾. Small intestinal surface area has been reported to scale closely to isometry with respect to MBW in the above-mentioned non-ruminant species. Although colonic surface area scales isometrically to MBW, the goodness of fit is much lower compared to that of the small intestine. Caecum surface area shows a large variation and is allometrically scaled to MBW. With respect to intestinal volume, all three compartments are allometrically scaled to MBW. Morphometrics of the human large intestine are presented in Fig. 3 in terms of surface area and volume where two isometric lines are drawn for comparison of humans to other species. Relative volume of the human large intestine compares closely to dogs, rats, and mice while relative surface area compares favourably to dogs and cats. Pigs have both a higher relative volume and surface area of the large intestine compared to humans. The coefficient of gut differentiation (area large intestine/area small intestine × 100), an indicator of the importance of the functional participation of the large intestine in the absorptive process⁽Reference Chivers and Hladik⁶⁸⁾, shows values for humans of 7, cats 9, dogs 11, rats 30, mice 31, pigs 41, horses 51, guinea pigs 72, and rabbits 103. Similarly, the coefficient of fermentation (large intestinal/small intestinal volume × 10), an indicator of the participation of the large intestine in the fermentation processes, is for humans only 0·7, cats 2·9, dog 4·1, rats 10·2, mice 7·2, pigs 9·9, horses 29·8, guinea pigs 31·7, and rabbits 71·2. These data indicate that the large intestine of the dog would be the closest match to humans when it comes to large intestinal morphology. The rat and pig, often used to study nutritional aspects of humans⁽Reference Deglaire, Bos and Tomé^8, Reference Fuller and Tomé^10, Reference Moughan⁵⁴⁾ compare less favourably but better than other non-ruminants. Such observations, however, do not invalidate the pig as a model for human upper tract digestion.

Fig. 3

Surface area and volume of the large intestine for various non-ruminant species and comparison of the isometric relationship relative to humans (lines).

Besides comparative quantitative morphometric data, transit time of food/digesta affects large intestinal amino acid degradation by the microbiota and NH₃ diffusion across the large intestinal wall. The importance of large intestinal transit time on nutrient fermentation by the microbiota was investigated by feeding a mixed diet to the energy requirements of 7 human subjects and changing the mean transit time by administration of drugs affecting colonic motility⁽Reference Stephen, Wiggins and Cummings⁶⁹⁾. Drug doses were adjusted to halve or double the mean transit time compared to a control group. Decreasing mean colonic transit time by 54 % resulted in an increased stool weight and significant increase in bacterial mass from 16·5 to 20·3 g/day. Increasing mean transit time to 186 %, decreased stool weight, and decreased bacterial mass from a mean of 18·9 to 16·1 g/day. Bacterial mass and transit time were significantly correlated indicating that changes in transit time alter microbial growth which in turn affects the quantity of N fixed as microbial protein and NH₃ generated.

In general, the total gastrointestinal transit time largely reflects the transit time through the large intestine in non-ruminant animal species. Specific data of transit time through the large intestine and its segments (i.e. caecum, colon) are however limited. Data on large intestinal transit time for several non-ruminant animal species are shown in Table 2. In healthy adult humans, large intestinal transit time of digesta varied considerable within studies ranging from 9 to 46 h⁽Reference Madsen⁷⁰⁾, 21 to 76 h⁽Reference Graff, Brinch and Madsen⁷¹⁾, and 14 to 75 h⁽Reference Madsen and Graff⁷²⁾. This inter-individual variation indicates that regulation of the digesta transit by the large intestine is complex and may depend on various factors (e.g. food type, gender, age, physical activity). The average large intestinal transit time in these studies was found to be 28 h⁽Reference Madsen⁷⁰⁾, 43·5 h⁽Reference Graff, Brinch and Madsen⁷¹⁾, and 39·0 h⁽Reference Madsen and Graff⁷²⁾. With a length of the large intestine of approximately 100 to 150 cm⁽Reference Maurer and Parkman⁷³⁾, the rate of transit would be 2·3 to 5·4 cm/h. The transit time through the total large intestine in rats is within the lower range of that observed in humans and is affected by age⁽Reference Varga^74, Reference Warner⁷⁵⁾ and diet⁽Reference Goodlad and Mathers^76, Reference Mathers, Smith and Carter⁷⁷⁾. The large intestinal transit time increased with age in rats from 18·1 h at 19 days of age to 37·4 h at 561 days of age⁽Reference Varga^74, Reference Warner⁷⁵⁾. In rats, the site of digesta retention within the large intestine varies considerably, with caecal digesta retention accounting for 42 %⁽Reference Varga^74, Reference Thompson and Hollis⁷⁸⁾, 12·2 to 29·2 %⁽Reference Varga^74, Reference Warner⁷⁵⁾, 69 to 84 %⁽Reference Goodlad and Mathers⁷⁶⁾, and 41 to 75 %⁽Reference Mathers, Smith and Carter⁷⁷⁾ of the total transit time. Caecal digesta residence time is, at least in part, related to the amount of dietary fermentable substrate. Rats showed longer caecal digesta residence with increasing amounts of dietary raw potato starch⁽Reference Mathers, Smith and Carter⁷⁷⁾. The rate of transit through the colon ranged from 1·3 to 1·6 cm/h⁽Reference Mathers, Smith and Carter⁷⁷⁾. In rabbits, there is a considerable difference in digesta transit time through the large intestine between liquid phase and solid phase with considerably longer retention of the liquid phase⁽Reference Gidenne and Bellier^79, Reference Gidenne and Jehl⁸⁰⁾. This difference is the result of the retrograde transport of fluid from the proximal colon to the caecum when hard faeces are produced⁽Reference Björnhag⁸¹⁾. In pigs, caecal residence time of digesta accounted for 3·6 to 13·1 %⁽Reference Warner^75, Reference Clemens, Stevens and Southworth⁸²⁾, 5·6 to 12·2 %⁽Reference Morales, Perez and Martin-Orue⁸³⁾ and 6·4 to 8·5 %⁽Reference Le Gall, Serena and Jørgensen⁸⁴⁾ of the total large intestinal transit time. In the latter study, colonic transit time was affected by dietary treatment, with pigs fed a wheat flour-based bread showing a longer mean colonic transit time (56·0 h) than pigs fed one of the three other bread types (23·5 to 28·9 h). This suggests that pigs adjust colonic transit rather than caecal residence of digesta, as observed in rats. As in humans, porcine total large intestinal transit time may be considerable with transit times up to 73·1 h⁽Reference van Leeuwen, van Gelder and de Leeuw⁸⁵⁾. The rate of passage through the large intestine may be very fast in pigs as compared to the other animal species and was observed to be 21·3 cm/h in pigs fed a corn starch diet and 17·8 cm/h in pigs fed a raw potato starch diet⁽Reference Martinez-Puig, Pérez and Castillo⁸⁶⁾. This rapid transit may also be due to the high feeding level of the pigs. The pigs fed the raw potato starch diet also showed an increased length of the large intestine (410 cm vs. 340 cm) and prolonged transit time through the colon (23 vs. 16 h)⁽Reference Martinez-Puig, Pérez and Castillo⁸⁶⁾. In dogs, transit time of digesta through the large intestine is also highly variable and generally increases with increasing body size⁽Reference Hernot, Dumon and Biourge⁸⁷⁾, although it may vary considerable making prediction of transit time through the large intestine of dogs varying in body weight difficult⁽Reference Boillat, Gaschen and Hosgood⁸⁸⁾. Dogs with a body weight of 23·9 kg (Giant Schnauzer) showed an average large intestinal transit time of 39·4 h⁽Reference Hernot, Dumon and Biourge⁸⁷⁾ which is close to the average observed in human subjects⁽Reference Graff, Brinch and Madsen^71, Reference Madsen and Graff⁷²⁾. Based on a length of the large intestine of 79·2 cm for a 13·8 kg dog calculated from Snipes and Snipes⁽Reference Snipes and Snipes⁶²⁾ and a large intestinal transit time of 18·5 h for a 12·9 kg dog⁽Reference Hernot, Dumon and Biourge⁸⁷⁾ the estimated rate of transit is approximately 4·3 cm/h. Caecal residence time is short in dogs and was found to be 1·0 % for PEG and Cr-EDTA markers and 4·8 % for radiopaque polyethylene markers⁽Reference Warner^75, Reference Banta, Clemens and Krinsky⁸⁹⁾. Cats showed considerably longer large intestinal transit times of 26·8 h⁽Reference Chandler, Guilford and Lawoko⁹⁰⁾. With a length of 24·3 cm for the feline large intestine⁽Reference Snipes and Snipes⁶²⁾, the estimated rate of passage was 0·9 cm/h. In conclusion, the transit of digesta through the large intestine in terms of duration and rate differs considerably between animal species. Both the transit time and the rate of transit of digesta through the large intestine observed in dogs appears to be comparable to mean values observed in and estimated for human subjects.

Table 2

Mean large intestinal (LI) transit times for several non-ruminant animal species

Abbreviations: BW, body weight; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; PEG, polyethylene glycol; DTPA, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.

* Initial body weight.

† Calculated as the difference between mean gastro-caecal and total tract transit times.

‡ Calculated as the difference between mean oro-caecal and total tract transit times.

§ Calculated as the sum of mean caecal and mean colonic transit times.

Both morphometrically and in terms of transit time, dogs would appear to be closest (of the species studied here) to humans. Limited information is available with regard to similarity in large intestinal microbial activity between both species. Minor differences in total short-chain fatty acid production were found between human and canine faecal inocula when incubated with types of fibre in vitro ⁽Reference Sunvold, Hussein and Fahey⁹¹⁾ but it is unknown if the microbial degradation of amino acids is similar between species. Data on differences between apparent ileal and faecal or true amino acid digestibility in dogs are limited to one study⁽Reference Hendriks and Sritharan⁹²⁾ where significant differences in apparent faecal digestibility values (faeces-ileal) have been reported for aspartic acid (7·2 %), glycine (6·1 %), methionine ( − 3·6 %), proline (5·2 %), serine (5·8 %) and threonine (6·8 %). For growing pigs, much more data are available which indicate that there is no apparent pattern in hindgut amino acid catabolism, although several authors have commented on the net synthesis of methionine and lysine in the large intestine⁽Reference Fuller and Tomé^10, Reference Moughan^54, Reference Hendriks and Sritharan^92, Reference Yin, Chen and Zhong⁹³⁾. The latter makes prediction of the magnitude of the error in apparent faecal digestibility of individual amino acids in humans difficult. Based on the increased N disappearance with decreasing ileal protein digestibility, it can be expected that the magnitude of the error increases with decreasing protein digestibility.

Conclusion

Large intestinal N disappearance due to microbial metabolism of N-containing substrates resulting in NH₃ formation and absorption increases with decreasing apparent ileal digestibility of protein for horses, dogs, rats, and pigs. Nitrogen disappearance from the large intestine of chickens and blue foxes appears to be minimal although for the latter species limited data are available. Based on morphometric and transit time data, it can be expected that the N disappearance from the large intestine of adult humans is similar to that of adult dogs. For every unit of N entering the large intestine, 50 % is absorbed indicating a major metabolism of N-containing compounds. As the majority of amino acids in the hindgut are found in microbial bodies, significant microbial metabolism of dietary and endogenous amino acids occurs and determination of amino acid digestibility at a faecal level in humans consuming low quality proteins would likely be highly inaccurate as a determinant of the amino acids absorbed from the intestine.