Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:56:12.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classification of potassium and chlorine ionic currents in retinal ganglion cell line (RGC-5) by whole-cell patch clamp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2012

SHU-JIE WANG
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Developmental Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
LAI-HUA XIE
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
BIN HENG
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Developmental Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
YAN-QIANG LIU*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Developmental Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. Yanqiang Liu, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: liuyanq@nankai.edu.cn, liuyanq2@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cell line (RGC-5) has been widely used as a valuable model for studying pathophysiology and physiology of retinal ganglion cells in vitro. However, the electrophysiological characteristics, especially a thorough classification of ionic currents in the cell line, remain to be elucidated in details. In the present study, we determined the resting membrane potential (RMP) in RGC-5 cell line and then identified different types of ionic currents by using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. The RMP recorded in the cell line was between −30 and −6 mV (−17.6 ± 2.6 mV, n = 10). We observed the following voltage-gated ion channel currents: (1) inwardly rectifying Cl− current (ICl,ir), which could be blocked by Zn2+; (2) Ca2+-activated Cl− current (ICl,Ca), which was sensitive to extracellular Ca2+ and could be inhibited by disodium 4,4’-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2’-disulfonate; (3) inwardly rectifying K+ currents (IK1), which could be blocked by Ba2+; (4) a small amount of delayed rectifier K+ current (IK). On the other hand, the voltage-gated sodium channels current (INa) and transient outward potassium channels current (IA) were not observed in this cell line. These results further characterize the ionic currents in the RGC-5 cell line and are beneficial for future studies especially on ion channel (patho)physiology and pharmacology in the RGC-5 cell line.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The micrograph of RGC-5 cells seeded on a dish for whole-cell patch-clamp recording, scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Typical current traces and the I-V relationship of whole-cell currents recorded in RGC-5 cell line by a series of increasing voltages from −140 to +90 mV with a 10-mV step for 200 ms from a holding potential of −80 mV. (A) The voltage-clamp protocol. (B) The whole-cell current traces including inward and outward current recorded in RGC-5 cell line. The zero current level is indicated by the dashed line. (C) The current–voltage (I-V) relationships showed a reversal potential at about −10 mV (n = 6).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Whole-cell inwardly rectifying current was inhibited by Ba2+ and Zn2+ in RGC-5 cell line. (A) Current traces recorded in the absence of any blockers. (B) Current traces recorded in the presence of 50 μM Ba2+. (C) Current traces recorded in the presence of 50 μM Ba2+ and 50 μM Zn2+. (D) The I-V relationships obtained from the above three recording statuses (n = 5). (E) The voltage-clamp protocol: a series of increasing voltages from −140 to +20 mV with 10-mV step for 200 ms from a holding potential of −20 mV (n = 5).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Typical inwardly rectifying Cl− current traces and the I-V relationship recorded in RGC-5 cell line by a series of increasing voltages from −140 to 10 mV with 10-mV step for 200 ms from a holding potential of −20 mV in presence of different concentration of Zn2+. (A) showed inwardly rectifying Cl− current traces in no presence of Zn2+. (B) showed the different I-V relationships of inwardly rectifying Cl− current recorded in presence of 0, 5, 50, and 500 μM of Zn2+, respectively (n = 9, 9, 5, and 4); * and ** respectively indicated P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 significant difference compared with 0 μM of Zn2+ treatment. (C) showed the typical inwardly rectifying Cl− amplitude current traces in presence of 0, 5, 50, and 500 μM of Zn2+. (D) showed the different inwardly rectifying Cl− current amplitude in presence of 0, 5, 50, and 500 μM of Zn2+, respectively (n = 9, 9, 5, and 4); * and ** respectively indicated P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 significant difference compared with 0 μM of Zn2+ treatment. (E) showed the voltage-clamp protocol applied for (A) and (B).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The Ca2+-activated Cl− current elicited in RGC-5 cell line. (A) The typical ICl,Ca traces elicited by a series of increasing voltages from −140 to +90 mV in a 10-mV increment for 200 ms from a holding potential of −20 mV. (B) The voltage-clamp protocol for (A) and (C). (C) The I-V relationship of ICl,Ca in RGC-5 cell line (n = 6). (D, F) Comparison of the amplitudes of ICl,Ca elicited in 2 mM Ca2+ and 0.2 mM Ca2+ of extracellular solution (n = 4, *P < 0.05). (E, G) showed ICl,Ca inhibited by 600 μM DIDS (n = 5, **P < 0.01).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Delay rectifier K+ current in RGC-5 cells. (A) The typical outward current traces showing a delay rectifier K+ current. (B) The current traces were blocked by 50 mM TEA. (C) The I-V relationships recorded in presence of 0 and 50 mM of TEA, respectively (n = 5; P = 0.001). (D) IK tail currents are shown clearly in a recording from another RGC-5 cell. (E) The voltage-clamp protocol: a series of increasing voltages from −60 to +80 mV in 10 mV increments for 200 ms from a holding potential of −70 mV.