Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:09:45.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mesenchymal stem cells combined with albendazole as a novel therapeutic approach for experimental neurotoxocariasis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

E. V. N. Beshay*
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
S. A. El-Refai
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
G. S. Sadek
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
A. A. Elbadry
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
F. H. Shalan
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
A. F. Afifi
Affiliation:
Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: E. V. N. Beshay, E-mail: engyvictor@med.menofia.edu.eg

Abstract

Neurotoxocariasis (NT) is a serious condition that has been linked to reduced cognitive function, behavioural alterations and neurodegenerative diseases. Unfortunately, the available drugs to treat toxocariasis are limited with unsatisfactory results, because of the initiation of treatment at late chronic stages after the occurrence of tissue damage and scars. Therefore, searching for a new therapy for this important disease is an urgent necessity. In this context, cytotherapy is a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of many diseases and tissue damages through the introduction of new cells into the damaged sites. They exert therapeutic effects by their capability of renewal, differentiation into specialized cells, and being powerful immunomodulators. The most popular cell type utilized in cytotherapy is the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) type. In the current study, the efficacy of MSCs alone or combined with albendazole was evaluated against chronic brain insults induced by Toxocara canis infection in an experimental mouse model. Interestingly, MSCs combined with albendazole demonstrated a healing effect on brain inflammation, gliosis, apoptosis and significantly reduced brain damage biomarkers (S100B and GFAP) and T. canis DNA. Thus, MSCs would be protective against the development of subsequent neurodegenerative diseases with chronic NT.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Detection of iron oxide-labelled MSCs in mice brain tissues by Prussian blue stain: (A) brain tissue of a normal mouse received MSCs at a dose of 3 × 106 MSCs in 0.1 mL of PBS via the tail vein (MSC-control group) showing few blue spots which indicate the presence of iron oxide-labelled MSC cells. (B) Brain tissue of a mouse from GV (MSCs/ALB-treated) showing numerous blue spots indicating homing of stem cells into the infected tissue with T. canis larvae. (C) Brain tissue of a mouse from GV (SC/ALB-treated) showing clusters of blue spots (MSCs).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. H&E-stained brain sections from different studied mice groups: (A) normal control group (GI) showing normal brain tissue with normal pyramidal cells (yellow circle), neuroglia (black circle) and granule cells (red circle). (B) The infected control group (GII) showing T. canis larvae (red circles) surrounded with mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate. (C) The infected control group (GII) showing thick-walled blood vessels (red circles) together with long-standing severe fibrillary gliosis (red arrows). (D) The infected control group (GII) showing diffuse activation of microglial cells (red arrows) and moderate gliosis. (E, F) Brain tissues from GIII (MSC-treated) showing long-standing fibrillary gliosis (red arrows) together with moderate thickening of an arteriole (red circle). (G, H) Brain tissues from GIV (ALB-treated) showing mild to moderate fibrillary gliosis, moderate thickening of an arteriole (yellow circle) and areas of astrocytosis (H). (I, J) Brain tissues from GV (MSCs/ALB-treated) group showing restoration of the normal architecture of brain tissues.

Figure 2

Table 1. Histopathological changes among the studied groups

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Immunohistochemical caspase-3 expression in mice brain tissues: (A) GII (+ve control) showing strong diffuse nucleo-cytoplasmic expression of caspase-3 in the pyramidal cells (blue circle), glial cells (blue arrow) and the neuropil (red asterisk). (B) GIII (MSC-treated) showing less improvement in caspase-3 expression. (C) GIV (ALB-treated) showing moderate nucleo-cytoplasmic expression of caspase-3. (D) GV (MSCs/ALB-treated) showing patchy mild nucleo-cytoplasmic expression of caspase-3 in the neuronal cells and the neuropil (caspase-3 immunoperoxidase stain). (E) The number of positive caspase-3 cells per mm2. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). ‡ indicates significance (P < 0.05) of the value vs GI (normal control), * indicates significance vs GII (infected control), # indicates significance vs GIII (stem cell-treated) and † indicates significance vs GIV (ALB-treated) by Kruskal–Wallis (k = 33.4; P = 0.00) followed by a post-hoc test.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Immunohistochemical TGF-β expression in mice brain tissues (red arrows): (A) GII (+ve control) showing strong cytoplasmic expression of TGF-β in the pyramidal cells (blue circle), glial cells (blue arrow) and the neuropil (red asterisk). (B) GIII (MSC-treated) showing no improvement in TGF-β expression. (C) GIV (ALB-treated) showing moderate cytoplasmic expression of TGF-β. (D) GV (MSCs/ALB-treated) showing patchy mild cytoplasmic expression of TGF-β in the neuronal cells (TGF-β immunoperoxidase stain). (E) The number of positive TGF-β cells per mm2. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). ‡ indicates significance (P < 0.05) of the value vs GI (normal control), * indicates significance vs GII (infected control), # indicates significance vs GIII (stem cell-treated) and † indicates significance vs GIV (ALB-treated) by one way ANOVA (F = 6584.6; P = 0.00) followed by a post-hoc test.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. S100B and GFAP gene expression in mice brain tissues from different studied groups: data are expressed as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). ‡ indicates significance (P < 0.05) of the value vs GI (normal control), * indicates significance vs GII (infected control), # indicates significance vs GIII (stem cell-treated) and † indicates significance vs GIV (albendazole-treated) by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post-hoc test.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Toxocara canis larva DNA concentrations in mice brain tissues from different studied groups: data are expressed as mean ± s.d. (n = 10). * indicates significance (P < 0.05) of the value vs GII (infected control), # indicates significance vs GIII (SC-treated) and † indicates significance vs GIV (ALB-treated) by one way ANOVA (F = 878.1; P = 0.000) followed by a post-hoc test.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Pearson's correlation coefficient between T. canis DNA concentrations and the studied cytokines and brain injury biomarkers in mice brain tissues.