Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:09:22.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of spinel-cordierite-plagioclase symplectites replacing andalusite in metapelitic migmatites of the Alvand aureole, Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

A. SAKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, 65355-141, Iran
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spinel–cordierite–plagioclase symplectites partially replacing andalusite occur in the metapelitic migmatite rocks of the Alvand aureole within the Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic belt, Hamadan, Iran. The presence of melt shows that corona development occurred under partial melting conditions. Spinel is predicted to grow with cordierite at around 700°C. Exhaustion of the available SiO2 and/or separation of sillimanite/andalusite from SiO2-rich matrix domains by cordierite resulted in the formation of localized low-silica activity domains and thus triggered the growth of spinel in the rim of andalusite, the reaction Sil/And + Bt = Crd + Spl + Kfs + melt, as the most common reaction for the development of coronas in the metapelitic of Alvand aureole. The breakdown of garnet to plagioclase + sillimanite, dehydration melting and the formation of spinel–plagioclase symplectite could occur during heating or decompression; these textures are limited to the contact aureole in the studied area, so heating is perhaps the more likely explanation for formation of the symplectites in the metapelitic rocks of the Alvand aureole. The P–T diagram, inferred paths and zoning profiles of garnet do not account for the decompression history of the terrane.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Location of the Sanandaj–Sirjan belt in Iran. (b) Geological map of the area (modified from Baharifar et al. 2004), with sample locations and stratigraphic column of the area. (c) Generalized geological map of the study area near Hamadan. Isograds (dashed lines) and metamorphic zones are shown (modified from Sepahi, Whitney & Baharifar, 2004). Some faults are shown (heavy lines within unit 4); contacts between zones 4a–4b, 4a–5, 2–5, and possibly 4–7 are faults. Zones: 1 – biotite zone; 2 – garnet zone; 3 – andalusite zone (±fibrolite); 4 – staurolite zone (a = staurolite + andalusite ± fibrolite; b = staurolite + garnet, no andalusite); 5 – sillimanite–andalusite zone; 6 – sillimanite–Kfs zone; 7 – cordierite zone (a = cordierite with no new growth of Al2SiO5; b = cordierite + neoblastic andalusite + sillimanite); 8 – cordierite Kfs zone; 9 – spotted schist; 10 – spinel + orthopyroxene zone (migmatites).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Field photographs of migmatites. A colour version of this figure is available at http://multimediafluids.uam.elogim.com/journals/geo. (a, b) Migmatite in which smaller leucosomes in (a) and (b) appear to be crystallized from melt derived locally, whereas the larger leucosome likely records evidence of melt moving through the system. (c, d) Plane-polarized light view of a Spl + Crd + And corona in the mesosome. (e) Sil + Crd + Spl in the mesosome. (f) The garnet as inclusion in the cordierite. (g) Feldspar–plagioclase–quartz patches (Lu), with the melt apparently segregated into mesoscopic patches or veins. (h) Euhedral shape of the plagioclase phenocrysts against intersertal quartz in (g).

Figure 2

Table 1. Representative mineral analyses of garnet and cordierite

Figure 3

Figure 3. Zoning profile from core to rim through the garnet in some samples of migmatite (mesosome; contact metamorphism), which shows a flat profile attributed to garnet crystallization in these rocks.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Zoning profile of the garnet in some samples from the regional metapelitic rocks, which shows prograde metamorphism (normal zoning) attributed to garnet crystallization in different regional metamorphic zones.

Figure 5

Table 2. Representative mineral analyses of biotite, spinel and ilmenite

Figure 6

Table 3. Representative mineral analyses of feldspar

Figure 7

Figure 5. Representative results of multiple equilibria calculation by THERMOCALC (3.2) program; a pressure of ~2 kbar and temperature of ~750°C can be considered for peak metamorphism.

Figure 8

Table 4. Activity values used for calculating equilibrium reactions by THERMOCALC

Figure 9

Figure 6. Pressure–temperature diagram (modified after Sepahi, Whitney & Baharifar, 2004) and representative picture of corona evolution in a P–T diagram. Al2SiO5 triple point from Holdaway (1971); other equilibria calculated using database and software of Berman (1991). P–T conditions and paths are shown for selected samples. Dsp – diaspore; Kln – kaolinite; Prl – pyrophyllite. The shaded field labelled ‘And’ (andalusite) shows the conditions at which the andalusite schists and andalusite–quartz veins may have equilibrated. The field labelled ‘St’ (staurolite) was calculated for the staurolite–garnet schist (SschH) using garnet–biotite thermometry, brackets from lower and higher grade rocks, and results of Baharifar (1997). The fields labelled ‘St + Ky’ and ‘St + Sil’ are partially defined by equilibria (e.g. the upper stability of staurolite + quartz), but the maximum pressure for St + Ky is not known.

Supplementary material: Image

Saki supplementary material

Colour figure.tif

Download Saki supplementary material(Image)
Image 10.8 MB