Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:41:13.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tokoro Belt (NE Hokkaido): an exhumed, Jurassic – Early Cretaceous seamount in the Late Cretaceous accretionary prism of northern Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2019

Shunta Sakai*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aramaki-aoba 6-3, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
Naoto Hirano
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aramaki-aoba 6-3, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan Center for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University, Kawauchi 41, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8576, Japan
Yildirim Dilek
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
Shiki Machida
Affiliation:
Ocean Resources Research Center for Next Generation, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Kazutaka Yasukawa
Affiliation:
Ocean Resources Research Center for Next Generation, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Yasuhiro Kato
Affiliation:
Ocean Resources Research Center for Next Generation, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Shunta Sakai, Email: shunta.sakai.q6@dc.tohoku.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Tokoro Belt exposed in NE Hokkaido (Japan) represents part of a Late Cretaceous accretionary complex, which includes variously metamorphosed volcanic rocks that are interbedded with chert, lenticular limestone and some fore-arc sedimentary rocks. The Tokoro Belt is notably different from other Late Cretaceous accretionary complexes around the Pacific Rim because of widespread occurrence of basalts and volcaniclastic rocks in it. The Nikoro Group, characterized by widespread occurrence of volcanic rocks, is divided into western, eastern and southern sections based on the internal structure, geochemical affinities and metamorphic grades of their volcanic lithologies. OIB (ocean island basalt)-type volcanic rocks with low-grade metamorphic overprint predominate in the western and southern sections, whereas MORB (mid-ocean ridge basalt)- and OIA (ocean island alkaline basalt)-type rocks in the eastern section with partly high-pressure metamorphism make up the northern part of the eastern section. Trace element patterns display transitional trends from MORB to OIA geochemical affinities. OIB-type rocks display trace element characteristics similar to those of shield volcano lavas on Hawaii, rather than small and mainly alkaline, Polynesian hotspot lavas; furthermore, they show significant HREE (heavy rare earth element) enrichment probably caused by plume–ridge interaction. Widespread OIBs in the Tokoro Belt represents tectonic slices of a large (>80 km wide) Hawaiian-style, seamount shield volcano on the Izanagi oceanic plate that was accreted into the continental margin of Far East Asia in the Late Cretaceous.

Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geological map of the Tokoro Belt and sample localities (after Sakakibara, 1991). (b) Interpretive cross-section of the Tokoro Belt (after Ueda, 2016). (c) Inferred tectonic reconstruction of the palaeo-Kuril island arc with the Tokoro Belt as its accretionary complex during the Late Cretaceous (Zharov, 2005; Yang, 2013; Domeier et al.2017). Palaeo-latitudes of the original position of this Kuril island arc are still poorly constrained (Nanayama et al.1993; Bazhenov & Burtman, 1994).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Representative petrography and outcrop exposures of Tokoro greenstones. (a) Outcrop at the Kokuriki Mine in the eastern section of the Nikoro Group. Sample 20170908-03 9 (basalt) occurs between manganiferous hematite ore (Bamba, 1984) and a metamorphic rock. (b) Pillow lavas under manganese deposits. (c) Outcrop at the Kunneppu limestone mine in the southern section of the Nikoro Group (Kunneppu Lime Industry Co., Ltd), where sample 20170906-01 was collected. (d–i) Photo-micrographs of samples (open nicol). Scale bar is 0.1 mm across. Abbreviations for key minerals: Pl – plagioclase; Sme – smectite; Cpx – clinopyroxene; Pmp – pumpellyite; Ep – epidote; Qz – quartz. (d) Basalt samples (20150801-04) showing an interserstial to intergranular texture. (e) Basalt sample (20170905-01). (f) Aphyric basalt (20150801-03 from Hiyoshi) showing a dendritic texture with micro-clinopyroxene and opaque minerals. (g) Basalt sample (20170908-03) showing an ophitic texture. (h) Basalt sample (20170906-01) showing an interserstial to intergranular texture. (i) Trachyte sample (20170909-02) showing a trachytic texture.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of sample information

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Geochemical discrimination diagrams. (a) Zr/TiO2 vs Nb/Y plot after Winchester & Floyd (1977). (b) Primitive mantle-normalized spidergram for the samples from the western and southern sections of the Nikoro Group (values of OIA, N-MORB and E-MORB are referenced from Sun & McDonough, 1989 and OIT from Verma et al.2017). (c) Primitive mantle-normalized spidergram for the samples from the eastern section of the Nikoro Group. (d) Hf/3–Th–Ta diagram (Wood, 1980). Small open and filled circles show previous data of gabbros and basalts at Hiyoshi located in the eastern section, respectively (Yamasaki & Nanayama, 2017).

Figure 4

Table 2. Geochemical composition of greenstones

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Comparative geochemistry of representative basaltic rocks from hotspot volcanic centres on the modern Pacific plate. (a) TiO2/Yb vs Nb/Yb diagram (Pearce, 2008). Two arrows show plume–ridge interaction. (b) Th/Nb vs Nb/Yb diagram (Pearce, 2008). Oceanic basalts of MORB and OIB plot within MORB–OIB array. (c) Nb/Zr vs Nb/Y diagram (after Tatsumi et al.1998).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Tectonic interpretations of greenstones estimated by the geochemical composition and the mode of occurrence on the sample localities. Small circle and squares show data from previous studies (Bamba, 1984; Yamasaki & Nanayama, 2017). Cross symbol shows a fossil locality (Hashimoto, 1960).