Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T15:04:29.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritional, trace element and heavy metal stability in human milk during standard milk bank processing.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2026

Ana Rubio-Granda
Affiliation:
Neonatal Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Marta Suárez-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Neonatal Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Leire Cardo González
Affiliation:
Clinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Clara González-López
Affiliation:
Neonatal Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
María Teresa Peláez-Nava
Affiliation:
Clinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Nodelina Arias-García
Affiliation:
Clinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Belén Prieto-García
Affiliation:
Clinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain
Gonzalo Solis-Sanchez*
Affiliation:
Neonatal Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Gonzalo Solis-Sanchez; Email: solisgonzalo@uniovi.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human milk (HM) is the optimal source of nutrition for neonates; however, mothers of preterm infants may experience insufficient milk production. Donor HM from human milk banks (HMB) undergoes freezing and Holder pasteurisation (HoP) to ensure safety, but these processes can alter nutrient and mineral composition. Heavy metals in HM also require monitoring due to neonatal vulnerability. We analysed eighty-eight HM samples from twenty-two donors at four processing stages: fresh, frozen at –20°C, post-HoP and frozen at –80°C. Macronutrients were measured using a MIRIS® HM analyser. Cu, Zn, Se, iodine, As, Cd, Hg and Pb were quantified via ICP-MS. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t tests. Macronutrient concentrations remained largely stable across processing stages. Cu and iodine exhibited significant stage-specific reductions, particularly following HoP and –20°C freezing (p < 0·05). Se and Zn were minimally affected. Hg and As were detectable in some samples but remained below safety thresholds, while Cd and Pb were undetectable at all stages. Notably, carbohydrate levels increased after –80°C freezing, likely due to sample homogenisation variability. Routine HMB processing effectively preserves the nutritional profile of HM while ensuring microbiological safety. Stage-dependent reductions in Cu and iodine suggest that careful monitoring is warranted, especially for preterm infants. Importantly, heavy metal contamination was negligible, confirming the safety of donor HM for neonatal feeding.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Processing flow chart. HM, human milk.

Figure 1

Table 1. Concentration of different macronutrients and energy in the different stages of processingTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Effect of the three procedures performed on an HMB on the concentration of macronutrients and mineralsTable 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Scatter plot. Correlation between freezing duration at −20 °C and carbohydrate concentration in HM frozen at −20 °C. HM, human milk.

Figure 4

Table 3. Concentration of different minerals in the different stages of processingTable 3 long description.

Figure 5

Table 4. Detectability of mercury and arsenic at the different points of processingTable 4 long description.

Figure 6

Table 5. Concentration of heavy metals at the different stages of processingTable 5 long description.