Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:18:48.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genesis of meta-gabbroic crustal xenoliths found in Neogene/Quaternary alkali olivine basalt, northeastern Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Saeed Saadat*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Charles R. Stern
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Saeed Saadat, Email: saeed.saadat@colorado.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rounded to angular granoblastic textured mafic xenoliths, ranging from ∼1 to 6 cm in dimension, occur together with mantle peridotite xenoliths in a small Neogene/Quaternary alkali basalt cone in northeastern Iran. These crustal xenoliths consist of plagioclase feldspar, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene and minor olivine, spinel, titanomagnetite and apatite. Their bulk compositions are similar to tholeiitic basalts and they are interpreted as meta-gabbroic rocks derived from mid- to lower crustal depths of 18 to 30 km. Rb–Sr dating suggests an age of c. 457 ± 95 Ma for these crustal xenoliths, and their geochemistry shows some similarities to Ordovician gabbros that crop out ∼20 km to the west. The data suggest that the gabbroic proto-lithologies of the xenoliths formed by intrusion of mafic magmas into the mid- to lower crust, possibly during extension and magmatism related to the opening of the Hercynian Palaeotethys ocean that separated central and eastern Iran from the Eurasian plate during the Late Palaeozoic.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Simplified geological map of the study area in NE Iran showing the location of the outcrop of alkali olivine basalt containing both ultramafic mantle and mafic crustal xenoliths (Saadat & Stern, 2012), as well as the location of Ordovician gabbroic rocks near Chahak ∼20 km to the west (Partovifar, 2012; Shojaee kaveh, 2014; Homam, 2015). The base map is taken from Geological Survey of Iran (1984). (b) Satellite image showing the location of the study area. (c) Photo of the outcrop of xenolites bearing alkali basalt. (d) Location of the study area in NE Iran.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photos of both crustal and mantle xenoliths in the alkali basalts of NE Iran (Saadat & Stern, 2012) and photomicrographs of a CPX (NXG3) and CPX + OPX (NXG1) gabbroic crustal xenoliths.

Figure 2

Table 1. Major oxides (wt %) and trace element (ppm) composition of two crustal xenoliths and Ordovician gabbros from the adjacent Chahak area

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Petrologic classification, based on Na2O + K2O (wt %) against SiO2 (wt %; Middlemost, 1994), for two xenolith samples (triangles) and their host alkali basalt (squares), as well as other mafic rocks from the adjacent Chahak area.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Plots of various element ratios for crustal xenoliths (triangles) and their host basalt (squares), and other gabbros from NE Iran. In the molecular Al2O3/Na2O + K2O vs molecular Al2O3/CaO + Na2O + K2O diagram (Maniar & Piccoli, 1989) the xenoliths and other samples classify as metaluminous. In the FeOt/MgO vs SiO2 diagram (Shand, 1943) they show tholeiitic affinity.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Trace-element compositions of two xenolith samples normalized to (a) primitive mantle and (b, c) a chondritic meteorite and compared to the host basalt (Saadat & Stern, 2012), average lower continental crust (Taylor & McLennan, 1985) and gabbros from adjacent areas in NE Iran (Partovifar, 2012; Shojaee kaveh, 2014; Homam, 2015).

Figure 6

Table 2. Electron probe micro-analysis of plagioclase

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Compositions of olivines, orthopyroxenes, clinopyroxenes and plagioclases in different crustal xenolith samples compared to their host basalt.

Figure 8

Table 3. Electron probe micro-analysis of clinopyroxenes

Figure 9

Fig. 7. MgO vs Na2O, FeO and TiO2 vs Mg#; and Al2O3 vs TiO2 in clinopyroxenes from CPX and CPX + OPX gabbroic xenoliths.

Figure 10

Table 4. Electron probe micro-analysis of orthopyroxenes

Figure 11

Table 5. Electron probe micro-analysis of olivine

Figure 12

Table 6. Electron probe micro-analysis of spinels

Figure 13

Table 7. Rb and Sr concentrations and Sr isotopic ratios of bulk and hand-picked mafic (M; cpx-rich) and felsic (F; feldspar-rich) portions of two xenoliths

Figure 14

Fig. 8. Rb–Sr concentrations and Sr-isotopic data for xenolith samples based on clinopyroxene-rich and plagioclase-rich mafic and felsic separates from two xenolith and one bulk xenolith samples. The 87Sr/86Sr and 87Rb/86Sr ratio of the host basalts (Saadat & Stern, 2012) is also plotted.

Figure 15

Fig. 9. (a) Plot of Y vs Zr (ppm) for crustal xenoliths, their host basalt and gabbros from NE Iran. The xenoliths and gabbros plot in the MORB field. N-MORB (normal), E-MORB (enriched) and OIB are from Sun & McDonough (1989) and Haase et al. (1997). (b) TiO2/Yb vs Nb/Yb (Pearce, 2008) showing the trends for MORB and OIB magmas. The crustal xenoliths are comparable to MORB.

Figure 16

Fig. 10. (a) Yb vs La/Yb, and (b) Dy/Yb vs La/Yb, for the xenolith and nearby gabbros, compared to fractional melting curves for spinel (0.578 Ol, 0.270 Opx, 0.119 Cpx and 0.033 Sp that melts in the proportions 0.10 Ol, 0.27 Opx, 0.50 Cpx and 0.13 Sp) and garnet (0.598 Ol, 0.211 Opx, 0.076 Cpx and 0.115 Gt that melts in the proportions 0.05 Ol, 0.20 Opx, 0.30 Cpx and 0.45 Gt) lherzolites.

Figure 17

Fig. 11. AlIV vs AlVI diagram for clinopyroxenes. Pressure domains are from Aoki & Shiba (1973).

Figure 18

Fig. 12. The crustal and upper mantle structure below NE Iran, modified from Su et al. (2014) based on the pressure and temperature conditions of equilibrium of the mafic crustal and ultramafic mantle xenoliths.