Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:38:41.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SiGe heterojunction bipolar phototransistor for optics–microwaves interfacing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2011

Pierre Lecoy
Affiliation:
ETIS (Equipe Traitement de l'information et des systèmes), ENSEA, Université de Cergy Pontoise, CNRS UMR8051, 6 avenue du Ponceau, F-95014 Cergy Pontoise Cedex, France.
Bruno Delacressonniere*
Affiliation:
ENSEA, 6 avenue du Ponceau, F-95014 Cergy Pontoise Cedex, France. LaMIPS (Laboratoire de Microélectronique et de Physique des Semiconducteurs), CRISMAT-NXP Semiconductors-PRESTO engineering, CNRS UMR 6508, 6 boulevard Maréchal Juin, F-14000Caen, France. Phone: + 33130736275.
Daniel Pasquet
Affiliation:
LaMIPS (Laboratoire de Microélectronique et de Physique des Semiconducteurs), CRISMAT-NXP Semiconductors-PRESTO engineering, CNRS UMR 6508, 6 boulevard Maréchal Juin, F-14000Caen, France. Phone: + 33130736275.
*
Corresponding author: B. Delacressonniere Email: delacressonniere@ensea.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new SiGe heterojunction bipolar phototransistor (HPT) based on a commercially available process was designed, realized, and experimentally characterized. Its internal characteristics, mainly the collector-to-base capacitance, vary significantly with the received light power, making it suitable as an active element of a light-controlled photo-oscillator. It can also be a key component of optical network-on-chip (ONoC). Its responsivity was improved and its transition frequency remains in the range of 30 GHz.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Layout of the phototransistor.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photocurrent IPH versus received power P.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Base to emitter junction characteristics.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Equivalent model of the phototransistor.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Variation of capacitance Cc with the received power P.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Variation of time constant τ1 with the received power P.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Variation of parallel capacitance Cb′e with received power P.