Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:38:58.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toward anti-fouling capacitive deionization by using visible-light reduced TiO2/graphene nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2015

Wei Zhang*
Affiliation:
Centre for Water Management and Reuse, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
Baoping Jia
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China
*
Address all correspondence to Wei Zhang atWei.Zhang@unisa.edu.au

Abstract

In this work, we showcased a visible-light-assisted reduction of graphene oxide (GO) using N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. Bench scale capacitive deionization (CDI) experiments determine the optimum working voltage for TiO2–reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanocomposites as CDI electrodes at 1.8 V. Furthermore, the coupled TiO2 nanoparticles within the as-prepared composite also exhibited photocatalytic ability by removing the humic acid model pollutant. This property is expected to be beneficial as it could relieve the degree of fouling on the electrosorptive surface caused by dissolved organic compounds. In the end, we have demonstrated their potential as a viable desalination water treatment technology in a pilot scale CDI unit.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) The color change of graphene mixture with N-doped TiO2 sol before (left) and after visible-light irradiation (right); typical (b) and enlarged (c) SEM image of as-prepared TiO2–RGO composite; (d) pore size distribution of TiO2–GO and TiO2–RGO, where the inset is the corresponding N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm; (e) the corresponding EDS spectra to SEM image (c).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Electrochemical performances of TiO2–RGO nanocomposites; (b) solution conductivity variation as a function of time at different applied electrical voltages, where the inset shows salt removal efficiency at different applied electrical voltages.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) HA removal rate with and without visible-light irradiation, where A0 is the initial light absorption at 254 nm and A is that at given time, t; (b) HA removal rate by sole TiO2 photocatalysis, where Ap at 254 nm is the light adsorption at given time, t.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Time-dependent current (a) and ion adsorption variation (b) of Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ions within 90 s electrosorption step.

Figure 4

Table I. Pilot scale electrosorption equation coefficients.