Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:00:48.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular detection and characterization of piroplasms infecting cervids and chamois in Northern Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2006

J. GARCÍA-SANMARTÍN
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, NEIKER – Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Berreaga 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
O. AURTENETXE
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, NEIKER – Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Berreaga 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
M. BARRAL
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, NEIKER – Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Berreaga 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
I. MARCO
Affiliation:
Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge, Facultat de Veterinária, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
S. LAVIN
Affiliation:
Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge, Facultat de Veterinária, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
A. L. GARCÍA-PÉREZ
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, NEIKER – Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Berreaga 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
A. HURTADO
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health, NEIKER – Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Berreaga 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wildlife can act as reservoir of different tick-borne pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic importance. To investigate the role of wild ruminants as reservoir of piroplasm infection, 28 red deer, 69 roe deer and 38 chamois from Northern Spain were examined by reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization. The survey detected a prevalence of 85·7% in red deer, 62·3% in roe deer and 28·9% in chamois. Four different piroplasms were identified: Theileria sp. OT3 (previously described in sheep) as the most prevalent (85·7% in red deer, 46·4% in roe deer and 26·3% in chamois); Theileria sp. 3185/02 (previously described in a red deer in Central Spain) more abundant in red deer (53·6%) than in roe deer (10·1%) but absent from chamois; Babesia divergens detected in 6 roe deer; Theileria ovis present in 1 chamois. Mixed infections (Theileria sp. OT3 and Theileria sp. 3185/02) were only found in red and roe deer. Sequencing analysis of the 18S rRNA gene confirmed the RLB results and showed 99·7% identity between Theileria sp. 3185/02 and T. capreoli, suggesting that they are the same species. Tick distribution and contact of wild ruminants with domestic animals are discussed in terms of piroplasm infection. The results suggest that a considerable number of wildlife ruminants are asymptomatic carriers that may serve as reservoirs of the infection posing a serious concern in terms of piroplasmosis control.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Reverse line blot macroarray of the PCR products generated by amplification of genomic DNA from wildlife samples and from pure plasmid DNA used as control. Oligonucleotide probes are indicated in rows, and samples are applied in columns as follows: lanes 1–8, field samples; lane 9, genomic DNA from uninfected roe deer; lane 10, Babesia sp. EU1 from an infected deer used as control; lane 11, mixture of bovine piroplasms 18S rRNA gene clones (note that cross-reaction occurs between the T. lestoquardi probe and the amplicon generated from T. annulata (Nagore et al. 2004b)); lane 12, mixture of ovine piroplasms 18S rRNA gene clones; lane 13, Theileria sp. 3185/02 18S rRNA gene clone; lane 14, mixture of equine piroplasms 18S rRNA gene clones.

Figure 1

Table 1. Pairwise sequence similarities between the complete 18S rRNA genes of Theileria species

Figure 2

Table 2. Distribution and frequency (%) of piroplasm species