Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:43:58.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pore-water controlled grain fracturing as an indicator for subglacial shearing in tills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John F. Hiemstra
Affiliation:
Fysisch Geografisch en Bodemkundig Laboratorium, The Netherlands Centre for Geo-Ecological Research (ICG), University of Amsterdam, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jaap J. M. Van Der Meer
Affiliation:
Fysisch Geografisch en Bodemkundig Laboratorium, The Netherlands Centre for Geo-Ecological Research (ICG), University of Amsterdam, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic classification of glacial deposits still proves to be highly controversial. In many cases, it remains unclear whether a particular sediment has been sub-glacially deformed. In the present paper it is suggested that micromorphological research is helpful where current techniques fail to lead to unambiguous interpretations. It is argued that the occurrence of fractured grains in glacial sediments is indicative of subglacial shearing and that such grains may be used as diagnostic evidence of glaciotectonism. Deformational mechanisms associated with the fracturing process are outlined and explained, using a series of thin sections from Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Fig. 1.(a) Gruin-supported zone in subglacial till, showing both angular, fractured grains and rounded, intact grains. Note in-situ fracturing, indicated by arrow. Detail of Mi.512; Kronsberg, Germany; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm; (b) Matrix-supported till, showing narrow, (sub)-horizontal planes (indicated by arrows) in which angular, fractured grains are lined up. Away from the planes, grains lend to be “intact”. Detail of Mi.511; Kronsberg, Germany; cross-polarized light; field of view: 7.0 mm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Applied fracturing criteria, (a) Artificially induced grain fracturing by grinding, witnessed by removed or completely crushed grains along the edges of the thin sections. Detail of R.974; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 5.6 mm. (b) Artificial type of cracking due to incomplete resin-impregnation, causing part of the sample to be distorted during thin-section preparation. Detail of Mi.511; Kronsberg, Germany; cross-polarized light; field of view: 5.6 mm. (c) The grain indicated displays slip of the fracture products along the meridional fracture plane. Displacement indicates that cracking evolved prior to “fixation” by impregnation. Detail of Mi.512; Kronsberg, Germany; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm. (d) Edges of the fracture products of the grain indicated can be matched, although the components have completely lost their coherence. Detail of R.972; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm. (e) Components of indicated grain show displacement along fracture. Supporting evidence for “primary” fracturing is obtained from intrusion of plasma into fracture plane. Detail of R.973; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Tracings of thin sections R.971-R.974 from Wijnje-woude, The Netherlands, showing the high correlation between void pattern and the position of fractured grains, as well as the decrease in fractured grain density with depth. Continuous and discontinuous lines represent voids delineating structural units (till aggregates). Dots represent fractured grains. The scale represents 4 cm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Correlation between grain fracturing and structural voids, (a) Photograph showing the angular structural elements in the lower part of the Wijnjewoude profile. Detail of R.973; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; plane light; field of view: 18.0 mm. (b) Photograph from the higher part of the Wijnjewoude profile, showing well-rounded till aggregates. Detail of R.971; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; plane light; field of view: 18.0 mm. (c) Significantly higher concentration of angular grains in the proximity of a planar void. Detail of R.972; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 9.0 mm. (d) Evidence of in-situ fracturing of the grain indicated, situated close to plane. Detail of R.973; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light: field of view: 3.5 mm. (e) Higher proportion of rounded, intact grains away from voids. Detail of R.973; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 5.6 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Type of fracture. (a) Most commonly encountered transgranular fracture. Diametrically colliding grains give rise to propagation of meridional cracks from the contact area (arrow). Detail of R.971; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm. (b) “Ring cracks” at the edge of contact area developed into divergent cone fractures (arrow). Also resulting from diametrical stress. Detail of R.971; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm. (c) Rare “crushing” of part of the grain ascribed to tangential loading. Detail of R.971; Wijnjewoude, The Netherlands; cross-polarized light; field of view: 3.5 mm. (d) Flake has been “chipped” off the grain surface (arrow) under tangential loading. Detail of Mi.511; Kronsberg, Germany; cross-polarized light; field of view; 4.5 mm.

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Cartoon depicting the rheological response to exerted stresses of a texturally homogeneous, fine-grained till. (a) Shear-zone development in response to application of shear stresses after dissipation of water. The displacement has occured along discrete planes. Strain hardening has permitted some grain fracturing to occur, predominantly along the sub-horizontal planes. (b) Brecciation of the dry till accounts for aggregation and progressive shear initiales “marble bed” movement. Rotation of till aggregates in combination with limited pore space results in high effective pressures and optimum conditions for the fracturing process to occur. (c) Additional strain causes the till to dilate; the sediment is forced to expand, subglacial meltwater enters the voids, thus reducing contact stresses. Hardly any grain fracturiug has taken place. (d) Collapse of the dilated configuration when strain in the material is not sufficiently rapid. Expulsion of pore water “stiffens” the material and the aggregates become blocked in a metastable configuration. The shear stress exerted may trigger another stage of shear displacement and a situation as in (b) may be generated.

Figure 6

Fig. 7.Cartoon, after Brzesowsky (1995), theoretically outlining the respective types of grain fracturing. Dashed lines conned “centres” of grains in contact. Arrows represent contact forces; shaded areas represent deformed contact regions. (a) Diametrical loading at low-compression rates. Ring cracks situated at the edge of the contact region pass into divergent cone cracks. (b) Diametrical loading at high compression rates. Radial fractures propagate as meridional cracks. (c) Tangential loading at high angles of incidence. Frictional sliding gives rise to occasional “chipping-off” of flakes from a grain surface. (d) Tangential loading at low angles of incidence. The process of attrition is exemplified by crushing of all or part of the grain.