Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T15:28:32.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of manual crimping on stapedotomy outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2022

F Couvreur*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium
C Schlegel-Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
T Linder
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author: Floor Couvreur; Email: floorcouvreur@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The impact of tight stapes crimping on hearing is a matter of debate. Several studies postulate that tight crimping is essential for lifelong success, whereas others have debated whether firm attachment leads to incus necrosis. Several types of prostheses with different coupling mechanisms have been developed, and manual crimping remains the most frequently used technique. This study investigates whether tightness really does affect hearing outcome.

Methods

The hearing results of patients who underwent primary stapedotomies using three different titanium pistons were analysed. The surgeons categorised the firmness of the piston attachment into ‘tight’ and ‘loose’ crimping groups. Hearing outcome and reasons for revision surgical procedures were investigated.

Results

The mean post-operative air–bone gap for frequencies of 0.5–4 kHz was 8.80 dB for the tight crimping group (n = 308) and 9.55 dB for the loose crimping group (n = 39). No significant difference was found (p = 0.4650). Findings at revision procedures were comparable (1.6 per cent vs 5 per cent).

Conclusion

Although firm crimping is strongly advised, a movable loop upon palpation does not lead to unsatisfactory hearing results, and does not mandate piston replacement or bone cement use.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic data for tight and loose crimping groups

Figure 1

Figure 1. Product specifications of the Fisch, MatriX, and MatriX SlimLine titanium stapes protheses.

Figure 2

Table 2. Prosthesis specifications

Figure 3

Figure 2. Pre- and post-operative mean air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) pure tone thresholds of the tight and loose stapes crimping groups.

Figure 4

Table 3. ABG closure in tight and loose crimping groups

Figure 5

Figure 3. Post-operative air–bone gaps (ABGs) for the tight and loose stapes crimping groups. PTA = pure tone average

Figure 6

Figure 4. Post-operative air–bone gaps (ABGs) for patients with tight and loose stapes crimping of the Fisch titanium prosthesis. PTA = pure tone average

Figure 7

Table 4. Surgical revisions in tight and loose crimping groups