Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:05:35.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using indirect computed tomography lymphography with iopamidol in a tongue VX2 carcinoma model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

Y Shu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
X Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Z Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
W Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Y Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Y Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Y Sha
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
H Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Haitao Wu, 83 FenYang Road, Shanghai 200031, PR China Fax: +086 21 64377151 E-mail: Haitaowu1103@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the performance of indirect computed tomography lymphography with iopamidol for detecting cervical lymph node metastases in a tongue VX2 carcinoma model.

Materials and methods:

A metastatic cervical lymph node model was created by implanting VX2 carcinoma suspension into the tongue submucosa of 21 rabbits. Computed tomography images were obtained 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after iopamidol injection, on days 11, 14, 21 (six rabbits each) and 28 (three rabbits) after carcinoma transplantation. Computed tomography lymphography was performed, and lymph node filling defects and enhancement characteristics evaluated.

Results:

Indirect computed tomography lymphography revealed bilateral enhancement of cervical lymph nodes in all animals, except for one animal imaged on day 28. There was significantly slower evacuation of contrast in metastatic than non-metastatic nodes. A total of 41 enhanced lymph nodes displayed an oval or round shape, or local filling defects. One lymph node with an oval shape was metastatic (one of 11, 9.1 per cent), while 21 nodes with filling defects were metastatic (21/30, 70 per cent). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values when using a filling defect diameter of 1.5 mm as a diagnostic criterion were 86.4, 78.9, 82.9, 82.6 and 83.3 per cent, respectively.

Conclusion:

When using indirect computed tomography lymphography to detect metastatic lymph nodes, filling defects and slow evacuation of contrast agent are important diagnostic features.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Investigation results for a rabbit imaged and sacrificed 21 days after carcinoma implantation. (a) Axial computed tomography (CT) scan taken before administration of contrast agent, showing no noticeable lymph node enhancement. (b) Axial CT scan taken after administration of contrast agent, showing lymph node enhancement indicating an ipsilateral (right) filling defect (arrow to left of figure part) and a contralateral (left) rounded lymph node shape (arrow to right of figure part). Histopathological analysis (H&E staining) indicated that the right-sided enhanced lymph node was metastatic (1c (×25) and 1d (×200); arrows), while the left-sided enhanced lymph node was non-metastatic. (Note that the CT lymphography image and histopathological specimens do not exactly align, as the section orientation was not identical.) R = right; L = left

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Investigation results for a rabbit imaged and sacrificed 28 days after carcinoma implantation. Prior to contrast administration, axial computed tomography (CT) showed no clear enhancement of lymphatic vessels (a) or lymph nodes (b); however, an obscured boundary suggested an enlarged right lymph node (b, arrow). After contrast administration, axial CT showed bilateral enhancement of afferent lymphatic vessels (c, arrows) and a filling defect in a contralateral (left) lymph node (d, arrow); the ipsilateral (right) lymph node did not enhance (d). Histopathological analysis (H&E staining) indicated metastasis in the left lymph node (e, arrow; ×25), while the right lymph node was confirmed to be over 80 per cent replaced by metastasis (f, black arrow; ×25) and necrosis (blue arrow). (Note that CT images and histopathological specimens do not exactly align, as the section orientation was not identical. Note also that part (f) is generated using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (version 2.0) software, as the full image was too large to reproduce.) R = right; L = left

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Mean computed tomography (CT) attenuation of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes over time, before and after contrast injection. Outliers represent standard deviations. Mean CT attenuation was maximal 1 min after contrast injection and decreased over subsequent CT lymphography images; total enhancement time was approximately 20 min. HU = Hounsfield Unit

Figure 3

Table I Mean filling defect diameter and intranodal filling defect ratio for non-metastatic and metastatic lymph nodes

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves for filling defect diameter and intranodal filling defect ratio, for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes. Az values, representing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 0.8804 for filling defect diameter (95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.77391, 0.98686) and 0.8900 for intranodal filling defect ratio (95 per cent CIs = 0.79097, 0.98893), as determined from computed tomography lymphography images. There was no statistically significant difference between these Az values (p = 0.8408).

Figure 5

Table II Utility of filling defect diameter and intranodal filling defect ratio as diagnostic criteria for non-metastatic vs metastatic lymph nodes: effect of different thresholds