Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:16:58.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnesium–sulfur battery: its beginning and recent progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2017

Zhirong Zhao-Karger
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU), Helmholtzstr. 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
Maximilian Fichtner*
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU), Helmholtzstr. 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
*
Address all correspondence to M. Fichtner at m.fichtner@kit.edu

Abstract

Rechargeable magnesium (Mg) battery has been considered as a promising candidate for future battery generations because of its potential high-energy density, its safety features and low cost. The challenges lying ahead for the realization of Mg battery in general are to develop proper electrolytes fulfilling a multitude of requirements and to discover cathode materials enabling high-energy Mg batteries. The combination of Mg anode with a sulfur cathode is one of the promising electrochemical couples due to its advantages of safety, low costs, and a high theoretical energy density of over 3200 Wh/L. However, the research on magnesium–sulfur (Mg–S) battery is just at its beginning and the development of suitable electrolytes has been the key challenge for further improvement, and, thus, in the focus of recent research. In this review, we highlight the recent progress achieved in Mg electrolytes and Mg–S batteries and discuss the major technical issues, which must be resolved for the improvement of Mg–S batteries.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Comparative cyclic voltammograms of APC and DCC electrolyte solutions on Pt electrodes. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 22. Copyright (2007) WILEY–VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (b) Raman spectrum of a 0.25 M APC solution. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 24. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a.) Cyclic voltammograms of the Mg deposition/dissolution of (HMDS)2Mg–2AlCl3 in different solvents on Pt electrode at a scan rate of 25 mV/s. (b) ORTEP plot (50% thermal probability ellipsoids) of [Mg2(μ-Cl)3·6THF][HMDSAlCl3]·THF. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Reprinted from Ref. 29 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) ORTEP plot (50% thermal probability ellipsoids) of [Mg2(μ-Cl)3·6THF][Et2AlCl2]. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Cyclic voltammograms: (b) MgCl2–EtnAlCl3−n (n  =  1–3) electrolytes; (c) MgCl2–PhOAlCl2 electrolytes under argon (blue) and after being stirred in dry air overnight (red); inset shows the charge balance of Mg deposition/dissolution, on Pt electrode at a scan rate of 25 mV/s. Reprinted from Ref. 57 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) X-ray crystal structure of Mg salt in DPSO/THF (Mg, gray; Cl, green; O, red; S, yellow; C, blue). (b) The 1st, 20th, and 200th cyclic voltammograms in DPSO/THF, Mo as the working electrode at 25 °C and a scan rate of 20 mV/s. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 63. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Ball-and-stick representation of the Mg[B(hfip)4]2·3DME crystal. Electrochemical properties of Mg[B(hfip)4]2 in DME. (b) Cyclic voltammograms on Pt electrode at a scan rate of 25 mV/s. (c) Linear sweep voltammograms on various electrodes at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. Reprinted from Ref. 81 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Discharge/charge behavior of the Mg–S cell in HMDSMgCl–AlCl3 electrolytes in THF. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 28. Copyright (2011) Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Results with (HMDS)2Mg + AlCl3 electrolyte: (a) Initial discharge–charge curves of sulfur cathodes with PVDF binder. (b) Cycling performance of sulfur cathode in the electrolyte in diglyme/IL (blue), in tetraglyme/IL (green), in tetraglyme (red). (c) The proposed discharge mechanism of Mg–S cell. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 32. Copyright (2015) WILEY–VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 7

Figure 8. The proposed discharge mechanism of Mg/S Battery with LiTFSI Additive. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 33. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) Schematic representation of a Mg–S cell with activated-CNF-coated separator(left), preparation of the CNF-coated separator (middle), scanning electron microscopy image of the CNF(right). (b) Discharge/charge profiles of the Mg–S cells at various C-rates. (c) Discharge capacities. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 35. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

Figure 9

Figure 10. The electrochemical performance of S/C cathodes: (a) Discharge/charge profiles, (b) Cycling behavior. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 79. Copyright 2017 WILEY–VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Battery performance of the Mg–S cell using Mg[B(hfip)4]2 in diglyme/tetraglyme as electrolytes: (a) Discharge/charge profiles, (b) Cycling behavior. Reproduced from Ref. 81 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 11

Table I. A comparison of some electrolytes and their utilities in Mg–S batteries.