Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T17:09:16.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of trematode and nematode lungworm infections in northern leopard frogs and wood frogs from Ontario, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2009

O.K. Dare*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaK1S 5B6
M.R. Forbes
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaK1S 5B6
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we examined trematode and nematode lung helminths commonly found in two species of host ranid frogs for competitive interactions. We examined 147 adult (breeding and non-breeding) and juvenile northern leopard frogs, and 84 breeding male wood frogs in Bishops Mills, Ontario for Haematoloechus spp. (Trematoda) and Rhabdias sp. (Nematoda) infections. A strong negative association between phyla of helminth was observed in breeding and juvenile northern leopard frogs, and also in breeding wood frogs, but not in non-breeding adult northern leopard frogs. Few hosts carried both types of worm concurrently. Thirteen northern leopard frogs carried dual infections, while 77 carried only one phylum of helminth. Twenty-seven wood frogs carried dual infections, while 54 carried only one phylum of helminth. We also observed spatial segregation of the two phyla in host lungs. Our study informs future research on the dynamics of interactions among lung helminths in these two host species.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Table 1Numbers of host frogs carrying lungworm infections (Haematoloechus spp., Rhabdias sp. or both). Data presented are single and dual infections in breeding male wood frogs, and adult northern leopard frogs in breeding and non-breeding condition, and juvenile frogs. Plus (+) and minus (−) signs indicate, respectively, the presence or absence of Haematoloechus (H) or Rhabdias (R) infection. Tests for association between Haematoloechus spp. and Rhabdias sp. among frog cohorts are reported in the text.

Figure 1

Table 2Haematoloechus spp. and Rhabdias sp. prevalence (%) with Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals on binomial proportions (CI), abundance and intensity of male wood frogs collected at the beginning (n=18) and end of April (n=66) 2007 and breeding male (n=54) and female (n=20) northern leopard frogs. Data reported are mean±SE; however, note that statistical analyses comparing parasitism between groups of male wood frogs were done using non-parametric tests (see text for details). We have therefore also indicated median abundance and intensity in parentheses.