Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:33:03.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mesoarchean Amikoq Layered Complex of SW Greenland: Part 1. Constraints on the P–T evolution from igneous, metasomatic and metamorphic amphiboles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

Emil Aarestrup
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1165 København K, Denmark
Taus R. C. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Mineral Exploration Research Centre, Harquail School of Earth Sciences and Goodman School of Mines, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
Paul E.B. Armitage
Affiliation:
Mkango Resources Ltd, 550 Burrard Street, Suite 2900, Vancouver BC, Canada, V6C 0A3
Allen P. Nutman
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2522, NSW, Australia
Ole Christiansen
Affiliation:
Kommune Kujalleq, Anders Olsensvej B 500, 3920 Qaqortoq, Greenland
Kristoffer Szilas*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1165 København K, Denmark
*
*Author for correspondence: Kristoffer Szilas, Email: krsz@ign.ku.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The metamorphic history of the Mesoarchean Amikoq Layered Complex within the Akia terrane of SW Greenland was characterised by electron microprobe mineral data and detailed petrography on 12 representative samples, integrated with zircon U–Pb geochronology and petrology. The complex intruded into a >3004 Ma supracrustal association now consisting of granoblastic metabasites with subordinate quartz-rich gneiss. Supracrustal host rocks contain a relict high-temperature assemblage of orthopyroxene–clinopyroxene (± pigeonite exsolution lamellae, exsolved at ~975–1010°C), which is interpreted to pre-date the Amikoq intrusion. Cumulate to granoblastic-textured rocks of the main Amikoq Layered Complex range modally from leuconorite to melanorite, orthopyroxenite to harzburgite/dunite and rare hornblende melagabbro. Observed mineralogy of main complex noritic lithologies is essentially relict igneous with orthopyroxene–biotite and hornblende–plagioclase thermometers yielding temperatures of ~800–1070°C. An anatectic zircon megacryst from a patchy quartzo–feldspathic leucosome hosted in an orthopyroxene-dominated Amikoq rock reflects local anatexis at peak metamorphic P–T conditions and yields an intrusion minimum age of 3004 ± 9 Ma. Field observations indicate local anatexis of orthopyroxene-dominated lithologies, possibly indicating a post-intrusion peak temperature of >900°C. The last preserved stages of retrogression are recorded in paragneiss plagioclase–garnet, biotite–garnet and host rock ilmenite–magnetite pairs (≤3 kbar and ~380–560°C).

The Amikoq Complex intruded a MORB-like crustal section and the former remained relatively undisturbed in terms of modal mineralogy. Preservation of igneous textures and mineralogy are related to an anhydrous, high-grade metamorphic history that essentially mimics igneous crystallisation conditions, whereas local high-strain zones acted as fluid pathways resulting in hydrous breakdown of igneous minerals. There is no evidence of equilibration of the intrusion at sub-amphibolite-facies conditions.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Simplified regional map of the Nuuk region of SW Greenland showing the main geological units and terranes. The red square demarcates the mafic–ultramafic Amikoq Layered Complex. Red dots and associated labels denote locations of samples obtained for zircon geochronology (AMI, QUA and FOS2). Modified after Szilas et al. (2018) based on mapping by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Detail of the Amikoq Layered Complex (red square in Fig. 1). Note the doubly plunging fold especially well observed at the South and North Margins. Base map modified after Garde (1989) published by the Geological Survey of Greenland. (b) West Margin simplified geological map illustrating lensoid ultramafic bodies contained in layered noritic sequences. Rock and mineral geochemistry suggest that the tectonised norite zones actually are of amphibolitic (host rock) character (this study; Aarestrup, unpublished data). Layering is approximately vertical. The geological map of the South Margin is available in Fig. S1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Field photos of the Amikoq Complex and host rocks. (a) West Margin sequence with norite, orthpyroxenite and an ultramafic lens (see Fig. 2b). Notice near-vertical layering. (b) Noritic sequence with modal layering overlying an orthopyroxenite unit. (c) Melanorite; orthopyroxene-dominated sequence with interstitial plagioclase. (d) Coarse, subhedral–euhedral orthopyroxene floating in a matrix of plagioclase and amphibole. (e) Coarse, unaligned subhedral–euhedral cumulus orthopyroxene with interstitial plagioclase and amphibole. (f) Feldspar–quartz leucosome (anatectic melt) containing green clinopyroxene, brownish orthopyroxene, black amphibole hosted in an orthopyroxene dominated rock. Clinopyroxene is probably formed through incongruent melting of amphibole. (g) Leucosome containing euhedral zircon megacrysts hosted in an orthopyroxene dominated lithology. The radiometric age of a similar zircon megacryst has been determined in this study. (h) Amphibolite raft hosted in TTG orthogneiss, demonstrating that the amphibolite is older than the TTG. Gloves beneath raft for scale. (i) Typical layered amphibolite (roof amphibolites) with a leucosome. Abbreviations follow Whitney and Evans (2010): Cpx = clinopyroxene, Opx = orthopyroxene, Pl = plagioclase, Amp = Amphibole, Qz = quartz.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Petrography of supracrustal host rocks/marginal rocks (a–c) and main ALC lithologies (d–h). (a) Sil–grt–crd aluminous gneiss (marginal floor). Pl + Qz halo around garnet in this part of the thin section. Crd is a major constituent of the rock. Note the Sil+Ilm nematoblastic band. PPL. (b) Mafic granulite (‘amphibolitic’ roof). Pyroxenes and amphiboles tend to be orientated in a stringer-type fabric – note that Qz is generally absent, except in reaction textures (see Fig. S6). Amp has clearly replaced the central formerly euhedral Cpx, which host pigeonite lamellae (Fig. S6). Cpx and Opx tend to be intergrown. PPL. (c) Hornblende melagabbro. Amp-dominated rock with typical granoblastic texture though Pl is typically blebby. The green Amp is replaced locally by retrograde stained-to-colourless Amp of Fe,Mg,Mn-type. Retrograde pale-green high-Al Amp commonly grows at Amp-Pl boundaries. XPL. (d) Dunite/harzburgite (West Margin). Granoblastic ol, with coarse relict grains containing spinel (s.s.) inclusions. Smaller, inclusion-poor/free grains are probably neoblasts. Chl overgrows Opx and Ol, and is typically associated with spl. BSE image. (e) Melanorite (South Margin) with relict magmatic textures. Cumulus-textured rock, with un-orientated, cumulus subhedral–euhedral Opx and intercumulus blebby Pl and Amp. Locally, Amp seems to form replacive textures on Opx while some Pl + Amp inclusions in large Opx might represent incomplete trapped melt pockets. Note the Pl wedge in the top, which cannot be reconciled with a metamorphic texture. PPL. (f) XPL of (e). (g) Norite (West Margin) with typical tectonised stringer fabric. Opx form peak-metamorphic stringer fabric that define lineation. Note the euhedral green Amp inclusions both in Pl and Opx. XPL. (h) Retrogressed norite (West Margin). Opx-stringers are nearly completely replaced by retrograde stained (Fe,Mg,Mn)-Amp. Former Opx boundaries are demarcated by mag, while it appears that green Amp was stable with the retrograde overprinting minerals. Notes: when amphibole type is unspecified, the ‘Amp’ is a green amphibole. Abbreviations: Grt = garnet, Sil = sillimanite, Crd = cordierite, Ilm = ilmenite, Bt = biotite, Chl = chlorite, Ap = apatite, Mag = magnetite, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Opx = orthopyroxene, Pl = plagioclase, Amp = Amphibole, Qz = quartz, Ol = olivine, Cr-mag = chrome-magnetite, Al-spl = spinel (s.s.), Spl = spinel (s.s.), Hc = hercynite, PPL = plane polarised light, XPL = crossed polars light, BSE = back-scattered electron.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Olivine NiO (wt.%) vs. olivine forsterite content (mol.%) in olivine of Amikoq and the Fiskefjord region. The range of various olivines formed through de-serpentinization have been plotted to illustrate their great range (Nozaka, 2010) relative to the narrow range observed in individual Fiskefjord olivine occurrences, and especially Amikoq. The ‘Primary olivine range’ illustrates the narrow range expected from igneous olivine, consistent with Fiskefjord olivine. The field denoted by a red line marks the highest metamorphic grade of Nozaka (2010). ‘Satellite bodies’ refer to minor ultramafic occurrences between the main central Fiskefjord complexes of Amikoq, Seqi and Ulamertoq (Fig. 2a).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Pyroxene quadrilateral with superimposed 5 and 10 kbar temperature contours from Lindsley (1983). Whereas the Pgt lamellae reflect a former high-temperature event, no coherent temperature information can be extracted from the three co-existing pyroxenes from the mafic granulite, and it is clear that all Cpx and Opx have re-equilibrated at lower temperature, in common with the green Amp (see Fig. 14). Cpx/Hbl ‘hybrid’ have major-element characteristics in-between Cpx and Amp (Table S3) – the analysis stems from the reaction zone observed in Fig. S6i. Tie-lines connect co-existing pyroxenes. Compositions calculated according to Lindsley (1983). Pyroxenes from Kristensen (2006) are not plotted as only some pyroxene oxide data are available, hampering critical calculations and assessment of minor components (see Lindsley, 1983). The dashed line marks the boundary of the ‘forbidden zone’. Numbers are temperature in degrees Celsius.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Anorthite content (mol.% Ca/Ca+Na) in plagioclase. Supracrustals tend to have more albitic plagioclase than the main Complex plagioclase, whereas norites tend to be more anorthite-rich than melanorites. Note the significant compositional range of plagioclase in the South Margin melanorite (orange triangles), which exhibit relict magmatic textures (Fig. 4e–f). The dotted arrow indicates that the low-An orthopyroxenite might be of supracrustal affinity. Smaller symbols are from Kristensen (2006). Abbreviations: Pl = plagioclase, Qz = quartz, Fsp = feldspar and Chl = chlorite.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Ca+AlIV+Fe3+ (apfu) vs. Si+Na+K (apfu) in amphibole. The potassic-hastingsites and pale-green high-Al Amphibole are clearly divisible from the majority of the Amikoq green amphiboles. The more evolved norite green amphibole tend to trend towards either a type of ferro-ferri-sadanagaite or -tschermakite end-member. Tie lines connecting selected end-members relevant for Amikoq amphiboles are shown. Black squares are Ca-amphibole end-members, grey squares are (Fe,Mg,Mn)-amphibole end-members (Hawthorne et al., 2012). Modified after Robinson et al. (1982) and Bonin and Tatu (2016).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Oxide compositions. (a) Cr# vs. Mg# in spinels. Spinels in olivine rocks are essentially bi-modal with some trending between two endmembers, Cr-magnetites and spinel (s.s.), whereas the few orthopyroxenite spinels show an oblique trending. Spinel is absent in the investigated norite. (b) Part of the Fe2+–Fe3+–Ti oxide tetrahedron (small inset). Only supracrustals/marginal rocks have co-existing ilmenite–magnetite pairs (connected by tie lines), all of which have extensively re-equilibrated during retrogression (see main text). Lines connecting end-member compositions and consequently solid solutions are shown. Tie line types define the textural relationship; dashed have magnetite exsolution lamellae in ilmenite or vice versa, while full tie lines have large, more or less homogenous magnetite and ilmenite grains physically touching.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Pressure-temperature diagram with conventional geothermobarometric results of apparent peak metamorphic conditions and retrogression for this specific rock. The same garnetcore–cordieritecore pair was used for all the calculations concerning peak P–T, with the maximum and minimum P–T results from various geothermobarometric calibrations indicated; preferred P–T estimate is circled, corresponding well with expected CrdMg# and garnet pyrope content of Aranovich and Podlesskii (1983), with the purple rosette corresponding to values approximately observed in the sil–grt–crd gneiss relative to the purple and green dashed lines. Retrogression temperature estimates use biotite–garnetrim pairs where the two closely spaced lines for each calibration indicate results from a biotite forming symplectite with plagioclase and a biotite from a large garnet margin (Fig. S16). Retrogression pressure estimates use plagioclase–garnetrim mineral pairs. See text for details. Dashed green and purple lines, and the Al2SiO5-phase projections are from Aranovich and Podlesskii (1983). The Chl = Fo + En + Spl + H2O equilibrium in ultramafic harzburgitic lithologies are from Evans (1977) and Zen (1972). Abbreviations: Crd = cordierite, Py = pyrope content in garnet, Chl = chlorite, Fo = forsterite, En = enstatite, Spl = spinel, B.etal88 = Bhattacharya et al. (1988), HandL77 = Holdaway and Lee (1977), HandS88 = Hodges and Spear (1982), IandM85 = Indares and Martignole (1985), K89 = Koziol (1989), KandN88 = Koziol and Newton (1988), P.etal85 = Perchuk et al. (1985), PandL83 = Perchuk and Lavrent'eva (1983), T76 = Thompson (1976) and WandR79 = Wells and Richardson (1979).

Figure 10

Table 1. Major-element compositions of Amikoq supracrustals compared to various lithologies from the literature.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Temperature vs. B(Na+Ca) in amphibole with (Fe,Mg,Mn)-amphibole – Ca-amphibole solvus limbs, after Schumacher (2007). Bars labelled ‘Ath’ and ‘Ca-amp’ denote the anthophyllite and Ca-amphibole range, respectively. The compositional range is considerably smaller for B(Na+Ca) than TAl–ANa–AK (Fig. S18), which could indicate that the former is the more reliable parameter; especially for the norites, which form tight clusters indicating a temperature range of ~500–650°C. Symbols with black rims are cummingtonites, otherwise as in Fig. 11 – note that the plotted norites are retrogressed varieties.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Edenite component, Mg#, AlIV and Ti in amphiboles. (a) Edenite component vs. Mg#. (b) Ti (apfu) vs. AlIV (apfu). (c) Edenite-component vs. AlIV (apfu). See text for details. ‘Alaskan Complexes’ amphiboles are from Himmelberg and Loney (1995), ‘Arc xenolith’ amphiboles are from Arculus and Wills (1980), DeBari and Coleman (1989) and Tollan et al. (2012), ‘Stillwater ultramafic’ amphiboles are from Page and Zientek (1987); average metamorphic amphibole composition from Schumacher (2007); experimental amphiboles are from Helz (1973, 1979) – indicated 925°C Amp is likely to be an experimental outlier; small symbols are Amikoq amphiboles from Kristensen (2006) and Szilas et al. (2015). All amphiboles have been recalculated using the spreadsheet of Locock (2014). Mg# = Mg / (Mg+Fe2+). Edenite component is the A-site occupancy (Schumacher, 2007), i.e. AK + ANa + ACa; Ca is usually not found in the A site in Amikoq amphiboles.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. AlIVvs. AlVI (apfu) in amphibole. The plot has been subdivided into qualitative fields where ‘Unaltered igneous’ amphiboles have AlIV / AlVI >3.3, ‘Low-pressure’ metamorphic 2.0–3.3 and ‘High-pressure’ metamorphic have <2.0. The division of low and high pressure correspond roughly to 5 kbar (Fleet and Barnett, 1978), consistent with the 5 kbar experimental data of Helz (1973). The roughly negative trend in Amikoq amphiboles, especially the host rocks, is probably related to a mixed igneous and high-pressure overprint. Note the distinct pale-green high-Al Ca-amphiboles. All other plotted data as in Fig. 12. After Fleet and Barnett (1978).

Figure 14

Fig. 14. (a) Pseudosection results of melanorite 191234 (Fig. 4e–f) from the South Margin in P–T space. Small insets from top to bottom. (b) Plagioclase anorthite content contours. (c) Quartz content (in vol.%). (d) Degree of partial melt in vol.%. Inferred P–T conditions experienced by the rock correspond to the Opx + Amp + Qz field, below the solidus temperature. This phase assemblage is inconsistent with that observed in the thin section, suggesting that the observed texture is most likely to be relict igneous rather than anatectic. An alternative plausible assemblage is indicated in bold red in (a), (b) and (c) – see text for details. Transparent fields correspond to recorded peak metamorphic estimates of the sil–grt–crd gneiss (Fig. 12). Orange full lines are plagioclase–hornblende thermometry (Holland and Blundy, 1994) results of melanorite 191234 and 191146, thick dashed lines are the minimum and maximum temperature results of retrogressed norites and the thin dashed line is the minimum temperature result of norite (maximum temperature is at >1000°C).

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Schematic summary integrating obtained non-igneous P–T estimates of Amikoq (see Table S13). The Cl-bearing K-hastingsite temperature is excluded. The high-temperature blue fields are assemblages where liquid + Cpx is present in orthopyroxene-dominated ALC lithologies relevant for some putative leucosomes observed in the field (Figs 3f, 14). The question mark at cordierite–spinel equilibria refer to the reliability of this pressure estimate (See Discussion section ‘Evidence for granulite-facies conditions and beginning retrogression’). The red ‘Cpx-in’ line is from sample 725 of Yakymchuk et al. (2020). Blue lines are selected mineral reactions in a MORB-like bulk composition (Palin et al., 2016) with the transparent dark blue field denoting the assemblage Opx + Cpx + Amp + Pl + Qz + Ilm + liq, relevant for the Amikoq host mafic granulite. The same assemblage is indicated by the transparent olive-green field but with a metabasite bulk composition (Green et al., 2016) – the Qz-out is according to the experiments of Beard and Lofgren (1991). Note the difference in Grt-in. Reddish fields: Fig. 10. Green field: P–T field assuming that retrogression recorded in green Ca-Amp of the host ‘amphibolites’ and mafic granulites and the formation of pale-green high-Al Ca-Amp is coeval, supported by both overgrowing high-temperature phases. Yellow field: Suggested temperature of Opx–Cpx (Fig. 6) – pressure is unconstrained and arbitrarily chosen. Light green field: temperature of anthophyllite – green Ca-Amp solvus where the pressure is suggested not to exceed around 3.8 kbar based on the 2-Amp field in Schumacher (2007).

Supplementary material: File

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material 1

Download Aarestrup et al. supplementary material(File)
File 720.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material 2

Download Aarestrup et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 402.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material

Aarestrup et al. supplementary material 3

Download Aarestrup et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 13.2 MB