The Palliative & Supportive Care journal challenges us to recognize and to fight racism in research (Goldzweig et al., Reference Goldzweig, Applebaum and Borasio2021). We suggest broadening the perspective of racism to include prejudice. Prejudice is recognized in many dimensions of difference including class, culture, language, gender, religion, sexual orientation, disability, and intellectual.

Prejudice against a given intellectual stance may be more difficult to identify and overcome. Herein are examples of intellectual prejudice:

1. 1. Academics from a different race who might have different ways of analyzing and thinking may find it more difficult to be published in higher impact factor journals.

2. 2. Researchers from countries which are the target of international discrimination may be collectively labeled and have their papers discriminated against.

3. 3. Strictly quantitative data are also subject to interpretation (Coryn, Reference Coryn2007; Lakew, Reference Lakew, Tosoni, Carpentier and Murru2017), hence different understanding and methodologies can produce divergent and even opposing results. This disparity will grow as big data, artificial intelligence, and computerized algorithms are increasingly used in risk factor identification and clinical decision-making.

4. 4. Where research shows that race is a risk factor for unhealthy or unacceptable behavior, should this finding be ignored since it might promote race-based disparities, or should these findings be used to improve care?

Social psychology research identifies several approaches to reducing prejudice and discrimination. They include:

• • Increasing intergroup contact and dialogue to dispel stereotypes (Wells et al., Reference Wells, Fox and Cordova-Cob2016).

• • Fostering greater empathy and perspective.

• • Minimizing boundaries by emphasizing commonalities (Pettigrew and Tropp, Reference Pettigrew and Tropp2006, Reference Pettigrew and Tropp2008; Beelmann and Heinemann, Reference Beelmann and Heinemann2014; American Psychological Association, 2017).

• • Creating specific anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies.

• • Transforming academic publishing norms to express the value of a plurality of identities and modes of identity expression.

These broad guidelines should find their place in medical and nursing schools, healthcare institutions, and national and international healthcare infrastructures.

The purpose of addressing discrimination and prejudice is to enlighten and to remedy — and where better than in science?

“That is what science is: that it is worthwhile rechecking, by new direct experience, and not necessarily trusting … experience from the past … Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts … It teaches the value of rational thought as well as the importance of freedom of thought. There is the beauty and the wonder of the world that is discovered through the results of these new experiences” (Feynman, Reference Feynman1968).

As scientist and palliative care physician, William Breitbart wrote: “I am …  in awe of the material world but I am also a human being who will continue to wonder and explore what lies within, without and beyond” (Breitbart, Reference Breitbart2005).