No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Intermittency in the relative separations of tracers and of heavy particles in turbulent flows
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2014
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Results from direct numerical simulations (DNS) of particle relative dispersion in three-dimensional homogeneous and isotropic turbulence at Reynolds number 
$\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}{\mathit{Re}}_{\lambda } \sim 300$ are presented. We study point-like passive tracers and heavy particles, at Stokes number 
$\mathit{St}=0.6,1$ and 5. Particles are emitted from localised sources, in bunches of thousands, periodically in time, allowing an unprecedented statistical accuracy to be reached, with a total number of events for two-point observables of the order of 
${10^{11}}$ . The right tail of the probability density function (PDF) for tracers develops a clear deviation from Richardson’s self-similar prediction, pointing to the intermittent nature of the dispersion process. In our numerical experiment, such deviations are manifest once the probability to measure an event becomes of the order of – or rarer than – one part over one million, hence the crucial importance of a large dataset. The role of finite-Reynolds-number effects and the related fluctuations when pair separations cross the boundary between viscous and inertial range scales are discussed. An asymptotic prediction based on the multifractal theory for inertial range intermittency and valid for large Reynolds numbers is found to agree with the data better than the Richardson theory. The agreement is improved when considering heavy particles, whose inertia filters out viscous scale fluctuations. By using the exit-time statistics we also show that events associated with pairs experiencing unusually slow inertial range separations have a non-self-similar PDF.
Information
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2014 Cambridge University Press
References
Abrahamson, J.
1975
Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid. Chem. Engng Sci.
30, 1371–1379.Google Scholar
Arneodo, A., Castaing, B., Cencini, M., Chevillard, L., Fisher, R. T., Grauer, R., Homann, H., Lamb, D., Lanotte, A. S., Lévèque, E., Lüthi, B., Mann, J., Mordant, N., Müller, W.-C., Ott, S., Ouellette, N. T., Pinton, J.-F., Pope, S. B., Roux, S. G., Toschi, F., Xu, H. & Yeung, P. K.
2008
Universal intermittent properties of particle trajectories in highly turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett.
100, 254504.Google Scholar
Artale, V., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Cencini, M. & Vulpiani, A.
1997
Dispersion of passive tracers in closed basins: beyond the diffusion coefficient. Phys. Fluids
9, 3162–3171.Google Scholar
Balkovsky, E., Falkovich, G. & Fouxon, A.
2001
Intermittent distribution of inertial particles in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett.
86, 2790–2793.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K.
1950
The application of the similarity theory of turbulence to atmospheric diffusion. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
76, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J.
2005
Multifractal concentrations of inertial particles in smooth random flows. J. Fluid Mech.
528, 255–277.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A. S., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F.
2006a
Acceleration statistics of heavy particles in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech.
550, 349–358.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Cencini, M., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F.
2006b
Lyapunov exponents of heavy particles in turbulence. Phys. Fluids
18, 091702.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A. S., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F.
2007
Heavy particle concentration in turbulence at dissipative and inertial scales. Phys. Rev. Lett.
98, 084502.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A. S. & Toschi, F.
2010b
Intermittency in the velocity distribution of heavy particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
646, 527–536.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A. S. & Toschi, F.
2011
Spatial and velocity statistics of inertial particles in turbulent flows. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
333, 012003.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Lanotte, A. S., Scagliarini, A. & Toschi, F.
2010a
Turbulent pair dispersion of inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech.
645, 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. F.
1984
Relative dispersion: local and non-local dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.
41 (11), 1881–1886.Google Scholar
Bennett, A.
2006
Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benzi, R.
2011
A Voyage through Turbulence (ed. Davidson, P., Kaneda, Y., Moffatt, K. & Sreenivasan, K.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Biferale, L., Fisher, R., Lamb, D. Q. & Toschi, F.
2010
Inertial range Eulerian and Lagrangian statistics from numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
653, 221.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Ciliberto, S., Tripiccione, R., Baudet, C., Massaioli, F. & Succi, S.
1993
Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. E
48, R29.Google Scholar
Biferale, L.
2008
A note on the fluctuation of dissipative scale in turbulence. Phys. Fluids
20, 031703.Google Scholar
Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Devenish, B. J., Lanotte, A. & Toschi, F.
2004
Multifractal statistics of Lagrangian velocity and acceleration in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
93, 064502-1–064502-4.Google Scholar
Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Devenish, B. J., Lanotte, A. & Toschi, F.
2005a
Lagrangian statistics of particle pairs in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids
17, 115101.Google Scholar
Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Devenish, B. J., Lanotte, A. & Toschi, F.
2005b
Multi-particle dispersion in fully developed turbulence. Phys. Fluids
17, 111701.Google Scholar
Biferale, L., Calzavarini, E. & Toschi, F.
2011
Multi-time multi-scale correlation functions in hydrodynamic turbulence. Phys. Fluids
23, 085107.Google Scholar
Biferale, L., Lanotte, A. S. & Toschi, F.
2008
Statistical behaviour of isotropic and anisotropic fluctuations in homogeneous turbulence. Physica D
237, 1969–1975.Google Scholar
Bitane, R., Homann, H. & Bec, J.
2012a
Time scales of turbulent relative dispersion. Phys. Rev. E
86, 045302(R).Google Scholar
Bitane, R., Homann, H. & Bec, J.
2012b
Geometry and violent events in turbulent pair dispersion. J. Turbul.
14, 23–45.Google Scholar
Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Crisanti, A. & Vulpiani, A.
1999
Pair dispersion in synthetic fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. E
60, 6734–6741.Google Scholar
Boffetta, G., De Lillo, F. & Gamba, A.
2004
Large scale inhomogeneity of inertial particles in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids
16, L20–L24.Google Scholar
Boffetta, G. & Sokolov, I. M.
2002a
Statistics of two-particle dispersion in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids
14, 3224.Google Scholar
Boffetta, G. & Sokolov, I. M.
2002b
Relative dispersion in fully developed turbulence: the Richardson’s law and intermittency corrections. Phys. Rev. Lett.
88, 094501.Google Scholar
Borgas, M. S.
1993
The multifractal Lagrangian nature of turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A
342, 379–411.Google Scholar
Borgas, M. S. & Sawford, B. L.
1994
A family of stochastic models for two-particle dispersion in isotropic homogeneous stationary turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
279, 69–99.Google Scholar
Borgas, M. S. & Yeung, P. K.
2004
Relative dispersion in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. A new stochastic model with Reynolds-number dependence. J. Fluid Mech.
503, 125–160.Google Scholar
Bourgoin, M., Ouellette, N. T., Xu, H., Berg, J. & Bodenschatz, E.
2006
The role of pair dispersion in turbulent flow. Science
311, 835.Google Scholar
Chaves, M., Gawȩdzki, K., Horvai, P., Kupiainen, A. & Vergassola, M.
2003
Lagrangian dispersion in Gaussian self-similar velocity ensembles. J. Stat. Phys.
113, 643–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., Doolen, G. D., Kraichnan, R. H. & She, Z.-S.
1993
On statistical correlations between velocity increments and locally averaged dissipation in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids A
5, 458.Google Scholar
Chertkov, M., Pumir, A. & Shraiman, B. I.
1999
Lagrangian tetrad dynamics and the phenomenology of turbulence. Phys. Fluids
11, 2394.Google Scholar
Chun, J., Koch, D. L., Rani, S., Ahluwalia, A. & Collins, L. R.
2005
Clustering of aerosol particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
536, 219–251.Google Scholar
Csanady, G. T.
1973
Turbulent Diffusion in the Environment. Ed. D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Eyink, G.
2013
Diffusion approximation in turbulent two-particle dispersion. Phys. Rev. E
88, 041001(R).Google Scholar
Falkovich, G., Fouxon, A. & Stepanov, G.
2002
Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence. Nature
419, 151.Google Scholar
Falkovich, G. & Frishman, A.
2013
Single flow snapshot reveals the future and the past of pairs of particles in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
110, 214502.Google Scholar
Falkovich, G., Gawȩdzki, K. & Vergassola, M.
2001
Particles and fields in fluid turbulence. Rev. Mod. Phys.
73, 913–975.Google Scholar
Fouxon, I. & Horvai, P.
2008
Separation of heavy particles in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
100, 04061.Google Scholar
Frisch, U.
1995
Turbulence. The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, J. C. H. & Vassilicos, J. C.
1998
Two-particle dispersion in turbulent-like flows. Phys. Rev. E
57, 1677.Google Scholar
Ilyin, V., Procaccia, I. & Zagorodny, A.
2013
Fokker–Planck equation with memory: the crossover from ballistic to diffusive processes in many-particle systems and incompressible media. Cond. Matter Phys.
16 (1), 13004: 1–18.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.-H.
1999
Multiscaling and structure functions in turbulence: an alternative approach. Phys. Rev. Lett.
83, 76.Google Scholar
Jullien, M.-C.
2003
Dispersion of passive tracers in the direct enstrophy cascade: experimental observations. Phys. Fluids
15, 2228–2237.Google Scholar
Jullien, M.-C., Paret, J. & Tabeling, P.
1999
Richardson pair dispersion in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
82, 2872.Google Scholar
Kanatani, K., Ogasawara, T. & Toh, S.
2009
Telegraph-type versus diffusion-type models of turbulent relative dispersion. J. Phys. Soc. Japan
78, 024401.Google Scholar
Klafter, J., Blumen, A. & Shlesinger, M. F.
1987
Stochastic pathway to anomalous diffusion. Phys. Rev. A
35, 3081–3085.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H.
1966
Dispersion of particle pairs in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids
9, 1937–1943.Google Scholar
Kurbanmuradov, O. A.
1997
Stochastic Lagrangian models for two-particle relative dispersion in high-Reynolds number turbulence. Monte Carlo Meth. Applic.
3, 37–52.Google Scholar
LaCasce, J. H.
2010
Relative displacement probability distribution functions from balloons and drifters. J. Mar. Res.
68, 433–457.Google Scholar
Lacorata, G., Mazzino, A. & Rizza, U.
2008
3D chaotic model for subgrid turbulent dispersion in large eddy simulations. J. Atmos. Sci.
65, 2389–2401.Google Scholar
Lepreti, F., Carbone, V., Abramenko, V. I., Yurchyshyn, V., Goode, P. R., Capparelli, V. & Vecchio, A.
2012
Turbulent pair dispersion of photospheric bright points. Astrophys. J. Lett.
759, L17.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S.
1981
Turbulent pair dispersion and scalar diffusion. J. Fluid Mech.
111, 27–57.Google Scholar
Malik, N. A. & Vassilicos, J. C.
1999
A Lagrangian model for turbulent dispersion with turbulent-like flow structure: comparison with direct numerical simulation for two-particle statistics. Phys. Fluids
11, 1572.Google Scholar
Masoliver, J. & Weiss, G. H.
1996
Finite-velocity diffusion. Eur. J. Phys.
17, 190–196.Google Scholar
Mazzitelli, I. M., Fornarelli, F., Lanotte, A. S. & Oresta, P.
2014
Pair and multi-particle dispersion in numerical simulations of convective boundary layer turbulence. Phys. Fluids
26, 055110.Google Scholar
Mordant, N., Metz, P., Michel, O. & Pinton, J.-F.
2001
Measurement of Lagrangian velocity in fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
87, 214501.Google Scholar
Ni, R. & Xia, K.-Q.
2013
Experimental investigation of pair dispersion with small initial separation in convective turbulence. Phys. Rev. E
87, 063006.Google Scholar
Nicolleau, F. C. G. A. & Nowakowski, A. F.
2011
Presence of a Richardson’s regime in kinematic simulations. Phys. Rev. E
83, 056317.Google Scholar
Novikov, E. A.
1989
Two-particle description of turbulence, Markov property and intermittency. Phys. Fluids A
1 (2), 326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollitraut, M., Gabillet, C. & Colin De Verdiére, A.
2005
Open ocean regimes of relative dispersion. J. Fluid Mech.
533, 381–407.Google Scholar
Ott, S. & Mann, J.
2000
An experimental investigation of the relative diffusion of particle pairs in three-dimensional turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech.
422, 207–223.Google Scholar
Pagnini, G.
2008
Lagrangian stochastic models for turbulent relative dispersion based on particle pair rotation. J. Fluid Mech.
616, 357–395.Google Scholar
Pan, L. & Padoan, P.
2010
Relative velocity of inertial particles in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech.
661, 73–107.Google Scholar
Poulain, P. M. & Zambianchi, E.
2007
Surface circulation in the central Mediterranean Sea as deduced from Lagrangian drifters in the 1990s. Cont. Shelf Res.
27, 981–1001.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F.
1926
Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A
110, 709.Google Scholar
Salazar, J. P. L. C. & Collins, L. R.
2009
Two-particle dispersion in isotropic turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
41, 405–432.Google Scholar
Salazar, J. P. L. C. & Collins, L. R.
2012
Inertial particle relative velocity statistics in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.
696, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B. L., Yeung, P. K. & Borgas, M. S.
2005
Comparison of backwards and forwards relative dispersion in turbulence. Phys. Fluids
17, 095109.Google Scholar
Scatamacchia, R., Biferale, L. & Toschi, F.
2012
Extreme events in the dispersions of two neighboring particles under the influence of fluid turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
109, 144501.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J.
2007
Sub-Kolmogorov-scale fluctuations in fluid turbulence. Europhys. Lett.
80, 54001.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J.
2008
Lagrangian dispersion and heat transport in convective turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
100, 134502.Google Scholar
Sokolov, I. M.
1999
Two-particle dispersion by correlated random velocity fields. Phys. Rev. E
60, 5528.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Antonia, R. A.
1997
The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
29, 435–472.Google Scholar
Thalabard, S., Krstulovic, G. & Bec, J.2014 Turbulent pair dispersion as a continuous-time random walk, http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7315.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J.
1990
A stochastic model for the motion of particle pairs in isotropic high-Reynolds-number turbulence, and its application to the problem of concentration variance. J. Fluid Mech.
210, 113–153.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. & Devenish, B. J.
2005
Particle pair separation in kinematic simulations. J. Fluid Mech.
526, 277.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. & Mehlig, B.
2005
Caustics in turbulent aerosols. Europhys. Lett.
71, 186–192.Google Scholar
Xu, H., Bourgoin, M., Ouellette, N. T. & Bodenschatz, E.
2006
High order Lagrangian velocity statistics in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett.
96, 024503.Google Scholar
Xu, H., Pumir, A. & Bodenschatz, E.
2011
The pirouette effect in turbulence. Nat. Phys.
7, 709–712.Google Scholar