Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T22:44:14.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charge transport in solution-processed zinc tin oxide thin film transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2012

Wenbing Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122
Rebecca L. Peterson*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: blpeters@umich.edu

Abstract

Zinc oxide-based transparent amorphous oxide semiconductors (TAOS) are strong contenders to replace amorphous and polycrystalline silicon for large area display backplanes due to their high electron mobility. To enable future roll-to-roll printed electronics, solution-processed fabrication methods are needed. Here, we use low-temperature measurements from 77 to 300 K to quantitatively compare charge transport mechanisms and band-tail density of states of solution-processed zinc tin oxide (ZTO) thin film transistors fabricated with different film composition and annealing temperature. The devices exhibit percolation conduction with Fermi level pinning at high charge carrier concentrations. The shape and energy levels of band-tail states can be engineered by process and stoichiometry. For optimal amorphous ZTO film with Zn:Sn ink ratio of 7:3 and annealing temperature of 480 °C, the band structure exhibits Arrhenius and percolation energy values of 7 and 3 meV, respectively, better than those measured by others for vacuum-processed TAOS films, showing the potential of solution processing.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1.Cross-sectional structure of ZTO TFT.

Figure 1

FIG. 2.(a) Transfer curves of ZTO TFT with different solution precursor [Zn]:[Sn] ratios, annealed at 480 °C. Inset, an output curve of a ZTO TFT with precursor ratio [Zn]:[Sn] = 7:3, annealed at 480 °C, with VGS = 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, and 0 V. (b) Transfer curves of ZTO TFT with precursor [Zn]:[Sn] = 7:3, annealed at different temperatures. All transfer curves were taken at VDS = 5 V.

Figure 2

TABLE I.Electrical parameters of ZTO TFTs fabricated at different annealing temperatures or from different zinc to tin ink ratio.

Figure 3

FIG. 3.(a) Cross-sectional TEM views of a three-layer ZTO film. The lower right image shows the amorphous and nonporous ZTO film at its interface with SiO2. (b) SAED of the ZTO layer, indicating amorphous structure.

Figure 4

FIG. 4.(a) Measured transfer curves at various temperatures for a transistor with W/L = 3000 μm/200 μm on a sample with zinc to tin ink ratio of 7:3 and annealed at 480 °C. (b) Effective mobility at various temperatures. For both (a) and (b), curves are shown for 77, 100, 140, 180, 220, 240, 260, 280, and 300 K.

Figure 5

FIG. 5.(a) Thermal activation energy of mobility versus zinc to tin ratio, for TFTs annealed at 480 °C. (b) Thermal activation energy of mobility versus anneal temperatures, for TFTs with a Zn:Sn precursor metal ratio of 7:3.

Figure 6

TABLE II.Arrhenius energy and percolation energy of ZTO TFTs fabricated at different annealing temperatures or from different zinc to tin ink ratio.

Figure 7

FIG. 6.(a) Band-tail states extracted from measured data (solid lines) and percolation energy fits (dotted lines) for various TFTs: A, B, and C have ink ratio of [Zn]:[Sn] = 7:3, annealed at 480, 450, and 400 °C, respectively. D, E were annealed at 480 °C with [Zn]:[Sn] = 8:2 and [Zn]:[Sn] = 6:4, respectively. (b) Comparison of exp(T−1) (dotted) and exp(T−1/4) (dashed) fit lines to measured drain current versus temperature for various VGS−VON values, for a ZTO TFT fabricated with 7:3 Zn:Sn metal ink ratio and annealed at 480 °C.

Figure 8

FIG. 7.Schematic of the band diagram of solution-processed ZTO.

Supplementary material: File

Hu and Peterson supplementary material

Supplementary figures

Download Hu and Peterson supplementary material(File)
File 560.6 KB