Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:39:55.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Neogene taxa of the tribe Chlamydini Teppner, 1922 (Pectinidae, Bivalvia) of southern South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2019

María B. Santelli
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, División Paleoinvertebrados, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina ;
Claudia J. del Río
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, División Paleoinvertebrados, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina ;

Abstract

The Chilean species traditionally assigned to the genera Chlamys Röding, 1798 or Zygochlamys Ihering, 1907 are now placed in two new endemic South American taxa: Dietotenhosen n. gen. (middle Miocene–early middle Pliocene), to include the southeastern Pacific Ocean species D. hupeanus (Philippi, 1887) n. comb. and D. remondi (Philippi, 1887) n. comb., and Ckaraosippur n. gen. (earliest middle Miocene–Pliocene), for C. calderensis (Möricke, 1896) n. comb. (Chile) and C. camachoi n. sp. (Argentina). Both genera are the youngest survivors of the tribe Chlamydini in southern South America. None of them is related to the circumpolar genus Psychrochlamys Jonkers, 2003, and the previous proposal of the dispersal through the Antarctic Circumpolar Current for the species included herein in Dietotenhosen is rejected.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/61b4bb50-321f-4b78-9069-609178ef0817

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society 
Figure 0

Figure 1.Geographical location of the fossiliferous sites: Squares indicate study areas enlarged in Figure 2: (1) Caldera area, (2) Coquimbo area. Triangles correspond to the sites from which the studied material comes; stars indicate other localities mentioned by Herm (1969) where the studied taxa occur.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Geographical location of the fossiliferous sites in: (1) Caldera area, (2) Coquimbo area. Triangles correspond to the sites from which the studied material comes; stars indicate other localities that were mentioned by Herm (1969) where the studied taxa are found.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Dietotenhosen hupeanus (Philippi, 1887) n. comb.: (1) external view of left valve, syntype of Pecten propinquus Hupé, 1854 MNHN.F.A26549 provided by MNHN online site, from “Coquimbo,” Coquimbo Formation; (2) external view of right valve, holotype of Pecten vidali Phillippi, 1887 SGO.PI 656a, from Mejillones, La Portada Formation; (3) external view of left valve, SGO.PI 5928a, from Quebrada Lagunillas, Coquimbo Formation; (4, 5) left valve, SGO.PI 5928b, from Quebrada Lagunillas, Coquimbo Formation, (4) internal view, (5) external view; (6) external view of left valve, WM 9614 provided by M. Terezow, from Playa Chorillos, Bahía Inglesa Formation; (7) external view of right valve, SGO.PI 5930a, from Quebrada Lagunillas, Coquimbo Formation; (8) right hinge, SNSB-BSPG 1966 IV 163 provided by W. Werner, from Quebrada Honda, Coquimbo Formation; (9) external view of right valve, SGO.PI 5910, from Quebrada Lagunillas, Coquimbo Formation; (10) external view of left valve with grooved plicae, SNSB-BSPG 1966 IV 163 provided by W. Werner, from Quebrada Honda, Coquimbo Formation; (11, 12) left valve, SGO.PI 1244, from Quebrada Honda, Coquimbo Formation, (11) detail of external sculpture with grooved plicae, (12) grooved plicae on ventral margin view. Scale bars are (1–8, 10–12) 10 mm; (9) 20 mm.

Figure 3

Figure 4.(1–3) Dietotenhosen hupeanus (Philippi, 1887) n. comb.: (1, 2) syntype of P. vidali Phillippi, 1887 SGO.PI 656a, from Mejillones, La Portada Formation, (1) detail of shagreen microsculpture on grooved plicae and interspaces on right valve, (2) external view of shagreen microsculpture on right auricle; (3) external view of shagreen microsculpture on left auricle, paratype of Pecten vidali Phillippi, 1887, SGO.PI 656b, from Mejillones, La Portada Formation; (4, 5) Dietotenhosen remondi (Philippi, 1887) n. comb.: (4) detail of shagreen microsculpture and macrosculpture on left valve, SGO.PI 1024b, from Caldera, Bahía Inglesa Formation; (5) detail of right auricles, SGO.PI 1109, from Caldera, Bahía Inglesa Formation. Scale bars are (1) 3 mm; (2–5) 5 mm.

Figure 4

Figure 5.Dietotenhosen remondi (Philippi, 1887) n. comb.: (1, 11) right valve, SGO.PI 222 holotype of Pecten remondi Philippi, 1887, from “Coquimbo,” Coquimbo Formation, (1) external view, (11) plicate ventral margin view; (2) external view of right valve, syntype of P. coquimbensis Möricke, 1896 UNISTRA 52731 provided by K. Janneau, from “Coquimbo,” Coquimbo Formation; (3, 5) right valve, GNS WM 9616 provided by M. Terezow, from Quebrada Herradura, Coquimbo Formation, (3) external view, (5) hinge; (4) external view of left valve, syntype of P. coquimbensis Möricke, 1896 UNISTRA 52732 provided by K. Janneau, from “Coquimbo,” Coquimbo Formation; (6, 10) right valve, SGO.PI 1024a, from Caldera, Bahía Inglesa Formation, (6) external view, (10) detail of antimarginal microsculpture; (7) external view of left valve, SGO.PI 1024b, from Caldera, Bahía Inglesa Formation; (8, 9) left valve, SNSB-BSPG 1966 IV 15 provided by W. Werner, from La Piña, Bahía Inglesa Formation, (8) internal view, (9) external view. Scale bars are (1–10) 10 mm; (11) 5 mm.

Figure 5

Figure 6.(1–11) Ckaraosippur calderensis (Möricke, 1896) n. comb.: (1) external view of right valve, holotype of Pecten calderensis Möricke, 1896 UNISTRA 52730 provided by K. Janneau, from Caldera, Bahía Inglesa Formation; (2) external view of right valve, SGO.PI 5411, from Isla Mocha, “Isla Mocha Beds”; (3, 4) right valve, SGO.PI 4815a, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation, (3) external view, (4) internal view; (5) external view of left valve, SGO.PI 4815b, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation; (6, 10) left valve, SGO.PI 4815c, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation, (6) external view, (10) detail of shagreen microsculpture; (7) external view of right auricle, SGO.PI 4815d, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation; (8, 11) left valve, SGO.PI 4815e, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation, (8) external view, (11) detail of shagreen microsculpture; (9) external view of left valve, SGO.PI 4815f, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation. (12–15) Ckaraosippur camachoi n. gen. n. sp.: (12, 13, 15) left valve, holotype of C. camachoi n. gen. n. sp. CPBA 8604a, from Puesto Salado, Camarones Formation; (12) external view, (13) internal view, (15) plicate ventral margin view; (14) left valve, paratype of C. camachoi n. gen. n. sp. CPBA 8604b, from Puesto Salado, Camarones Formation. Scale bars are (1–9, 12–15) 10 mm; (10) 4 mm; (11) 3 mm.

Figure 6

Table 1.Comparison of South American Chlamydini genera: Ckaraosippur n. gen.; Dietotenhosen n. gen.; Zygochlamys Ihering, 1907; Moirechlamys Santelli and del Río, 2019; Chokekenia Santelli and del Río, 2019; Pixiechlamys Santelli and del Río, 2019; Reticulochlamys del Río, 2004a; Jorgechlamys del Río, 2004a; Swiftopecten, Hertlein, 1936; and Chlamys Röding, 1798. RV: right valve, LV: left valve; PA: posterior auricles; LAA: left anterior auricles.

Figure 7

Table 2.Comparison of species of Dietotenhosen n. gen: D. hupeanus n. comb. (Philippi, 1887) and D. remondi n. comb. (Philippi, 1887). PA: posterior auricles.

Figure 8

Figure 7.(1) Ckaraosippur calderensis (Möricke, 1896) n. comb.: detail of left auricles, SGO.PI 4815, from Lo Abarca, Navidad Formation; (2–5) Ckaraosippur camachoi n. gen. n. sp.: (2–5) left valve, holotype of C. camachoi n. gen. n. sp. CPBA 8604a, from Puesto Salado, Camarones Formation, (2) detail of left auricles, (3–5) detail of macrosculpture and shagreen microsculpture. Scale bars are (1) 10 mm; (2) 2 mm; and (3–5) 3 mm.

Figure 9

Table 3.Comparison of species of Ckaraosippur n. gen.: C. calderensis n. comb. (Möricke, 1896) and C. camachoi n. gen. n. sp.