Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:25:56.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BSO algorithm and artificial neural network aided emission optimisation for gas turbine engine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

M. Konar*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
O. Cam
Affiliation:
Ali Cavit Celebioglu Civil Aviation College, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Türkiye
M. O. Aktaş
Affiliation:
Air NCO Vocational Higher School, National Defense University, Izmir, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: M. Konar; Email: mkonar@erciyes.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aircraft play a major role in meeting the fast and efficient transportation needs of modern society, thanks to their advanced features. However, gas turbine engines used in aircraft have many negative effects on human health. One of the negative effects is the exhaust gases released by these engines to nature. In this study, it is discussed to present alternative models based on heuristic methods to reduce the emission values of the synthetic fuel mixture used in the combustion chamber of gas turbine engines. For this purpose, a model based on artificial neural networks (ANN) based on the back-tracking search optimisation (BSO) algorithm is proposed by using experimentally obtained emission values found in the literature. In the proposed model, the parameters of the optimum ANN structure are first determined by the BSO algorithm. Then, by using the optimum ANN structure, the most appropriate input values were found with the BSO algorithm, and the emission values were reduced. The simulation results have shown that the proposed method will be a fast and safe alternative method for reducing emission values.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic view and photograph of the experimental layout.

Figure 1

Figure 2. 3D solid model drawing of the swirl burner.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Interior of the combustor.

Figure 3

Figure 4. A basic artificial neuron.

Figure 4

Figure 5. The created model structure.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Block diagram showing the stages of the proposed model.

Figure 6

Table 1. The best MSE values obtained during the training and optimisation phases

Figure 7

Figure 7. Comparison of the ANN models that have the best performance for the output of the NOx.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Comparison of the ANN models that have the best performance for the output of the CO.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Comparison of the ANN models that have the best performance for the output of the CO2.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Comparison of the ANN models that have the best performance for the output of the O2.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Comparison of the ANN models that have the best performance for the output of the temperature value.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Iteration number-MSE change graph for the optimum ANN structure obtained during the training phase.

Figure 13

Table 2. Input and output parameter values calculated during the optimisation process using the best ANN models